Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Koettmannsdorf Unterschlossberg Stausee und Strassenbruecke 03032015 0234.jpg

File:Koettmannsdorf Unterschlossberg Stausee und Strassenbruecke 03032015 0234.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2015 at 23:52:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Koettmannsdorf Unterschlossberg Stausee und Strassenbruecke 03032015 0234.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Koettmannsdorf Unterschlossberg Stausee und Strassenbruecke 03032015 0234.jpg

22

11

273

3258

4928

3280

suggested part to be removed.

• created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Hubertl -- Hubertl (talk) 23:52, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Info Bridge, crossing the river Drava seen from from Köttmannsdorf, South Carinthia. The mountain in front is the Rauth. This bridge was build in the middle of the 1960s, after a big flooding destroyed the old one
•  Support -- Hubertl (talk) 23:52, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Nice quality but the left border, vertically half-cut pillar unfortunately "closes" the composition too much in my taste for the harmony of the scene. Sting (talk) 01:25, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

  This version is better now? Sting, Kadellar, Kreuz? Thanks for a additional review!--Hubertl (talk) 14:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

  Much better now imho. Thank you Hubertl. Sting (talk) 16:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --XRay ^talk 04:28, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support This is the most striking image not of a church interior or Icelandic waterfall I've seen here in a while. I'd be OK with cropping out that half of the pier but, really, it doesn't bother me that much. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Great composition, perfect day and good quality. --Code (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
• still  Neutral per Sting, will support as soon as the crop is done --Kreuzschnabel 05:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Perfectly balanced composition now. --Kreuzschnabel 16:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support No church interior, but again something completely different.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral same as Kreuzschnabel. --Kadellar (talk) 13:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Done Thank you for your assessment. Cropped version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 14:23, 06 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support now, thanks. --Kadellar (talk) 16:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support And 7 --LivioAndronico talk 16:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
• now  Support. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 22:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ximonic (talk) 04:11, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer 07:49, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 08:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Could be sharper at 15 MP, but that's the price you pay for a flexible lens. The composition is really successful for me. --DXR (talk) 10:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. I think the WB is a little too blue. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:40, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:10, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support. — Julian H.^✈ 17:52, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Charles (talk) 14:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I agree, it's a little on the soft side, but the composition makes me not care. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:44, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:24, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /KTC (talk) 00:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges