Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kazan church edit.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Kazan church edit.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2017 at 18:30:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings
Info created by Maarten Dirkse - uploaded by Böhringer - nominated by Godhulii_1985 -- Godhulii 1985 (talk) 18:30, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Comment -- Not sure how those smokes on right side will be perceived. Also, not sure about tight cropping on bottom-left. But I like this picture very much therefore nominating. Godhulii 1985 (talk) 18:30, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Godhulii 1985: You can still add your own support vote if you want – Lucas T 18:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Oppose I can't live with that crop, sorry. BTW, the image is leaning in and there has happened something strange with the lower border. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Support Beautiful! Question, perspective correction, lens or software? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:46, 29 January 2017 (UTC)- Weak Support. Beautiful colors. Quality can be better given the resolution. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:38, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Question per Basotxerri, could you possibly add the rest of the mosque on the left and then do a perspective correction? This motif is really picturesque, but as things stand, I don't think I could honestly say this is one of the best composed photos on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)- Oppose Trying to process this pic year-two ago. No luck. Here neither. --Mile (talk) 06:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose May not be the photographer's fault entirely but light and colors make it look more like CGI than a photograph of an actual structure. Daniel Case (talk) 20:32, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose agree there is something wrong with the image--g. balaxaZe★ 21:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
