Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:JuminadLoojang.jpg

File:JuminadLoojang.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2015 at 20:43:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:JuminadLoojang.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:JuminadLoojang.jpg

1374

1153

4503

328

5890

3931

Strange, unnatural tides -- Pofka

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created and uploaded by Abrget47j - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 20:43, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 20:43, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 20:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very nice in thumb but in full resolution is a few blurred,sorry --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:27, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I think these tides (noted) looks quite unnatural... They are strangely blurred or something. Overprocessing? -- Pofka (talk) 21:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
• @Livioandronico2013: and @Pofka: , it is blurred but on purpose, ans is only a result of long exposure (0.6 sec, check exif). The rocks are sharp (not razor sharp though). It's a common practice to add sense of movement in a picture, or to create one of those surreal photos with a "creamy" sea. Livio, if you don't like it, it's fine (I'm not very found of the composition), but you can't oppose based on blurriness alone. That would be missing the point. - Benh (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • These unnatural tides simply doesn't work for me. Maybe every person assess such things differently. Though, I like everything else about this photo as it looks quite unique, so...  Weak support -- Pofka (talk) 22:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

• The point is that is blurred (purpose or not) --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

• Then maybe abstaining from voting or just saying you don't like it would be better. Your vote sounds like it's a technical issue, but it's not. Pretty much as if you oppose a Monet because it's a bit blurry... - Benh (talk) 22:18, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

• I judge the photo is taken and not as the subject. As I do not like fish eyes or the churches too distorted--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:27, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, but I don't think plants should be this blurred. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:33, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

• If there are waves, then plants should also dance with them. Jee 06:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose I think the point of this kind of photo is composition but its composition is not outstanding here (mood is there). --Laitche (talk) 11:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, too little resolution. --Tremonist (talk) 12:10, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others (although I definitely like the mood). Daniel Case (talk) 15:48, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose For others --Σπάρτακος (talk) 19:52, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 11:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC)