Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Japanese garden scenery at Expo Commemoration Park 2015-06-04.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Japanese garden scenery at Expo Commemoration Park 2015-06-04.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2015 at 22:40:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Japan
- Info Japanese garden scenery at Expo Commemoration Park, Osaka, Japan. created, uploaded and nominated by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Laitche (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support serene. --Pine✉ 01:13, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Very well-done technically, but no wow. Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- shoot :) --Laitche (talk) 07:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much blue sky (leaving that much sky in is really only suitable for skies with lots of interesting clouds), and shadows are rather dark. I would have focused more on the reflection below, and shot it either on a cloudy day for even illumination or during sunrise/sunset (whichever is more appropriate for the direction of light). --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:46, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- This is very small pond so this reflection is the maximum as you can see the nearer shore on the bottom right and bottom left, In this season in Osaka at 17:48, the sun is locating close to the horizon (altitude is about 14°) here you are but sky is still blue. And I intentionally took large blue sky in this composition but nominated the alternative which is cropped the sky :) --Laitche (talk) 07:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support High quality and compositionally interesting. Has wow in my eyes. --Code (talk) 04:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Reallay nice. --Tremonist (talk) 13:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Info New version uploaded (shadow adjustment) both original and alternative1. --Laitche (talk) 19:36, 5 June 2015 (UTC) and added alternative 2. --Laitche (talk) 23:51, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Disturbing sky. -- Christian Ferrer 17:30, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose The scene isn't doing anything for me. Not FP. -- Colin (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Alternative 1[edit]
- Info Cropped the sky. --Laitche (talk) 07:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 07:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Also good. --Tremonist (talk) 13:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose It looks better with part of the sky cropped, but I was unable to find WOW in it just like Daniel Case. I would put it among QPs. -- Pofka (talk) 19:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose More sharp but less good than the Alternative 2. -- Christian Ferrer 17:32, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose The scene isn't doing anything for me. Not FP. -- Colin (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Alternative 2 (other one)[edit]
- Info Other composition. --Laitche (talk) 22:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support a bit motion blur by wind though... --Laitche (talk) 22:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Also good. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:54, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment CAs (see note) -- Christian Ferrer 12:49, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Christian Ferrer: Fixed --Laitche (talk) 15:04, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support My favorite. -- Christian Ferrer 17:28, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support That leafs are calling for polarizer. --Mile (talk) 21:56, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks like an average travel snap.--Fotoriety (talk) 23:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose --Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:40, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose The scene isn't doing anything for me. Not FP. -- Colin (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Now I am preparing to come back. Thanks for all of your reviews and votes! --Laitche (talk) 20:27, 7 June 2015 (UTC)