Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frederic Edwin Church - Twilight in the Wilderness - 1965.233 - Cleveland Museum of Art.tiff

File:Frederic Edwin Church - Twilight in the Wilderness - 1965.233 - Cleveland Museum of Art.tiff, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2019 at 17:04:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Frederic Edwin Church - Twilight in the Wilderness - 1965.233 - Cleveland Museum of Art.tiff Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frederic Edwin Church - Twilight in the Wilderness - 1965.233 - Cleveland Museum of Art.tiff

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
•  Info created by the Cleveland Museum of Art - uploaded by BotMultichill - nominated by EurekaLott - Eureka Lott 17:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
• Twilight in the Wilderness is an 1860 painting by Frederic Edwin Church. A different image of this painting was formerly a featured image at en.wikipedia, but was delisted in 2006 due to the number of compression artifacts. It was Wikipedia's picture of the day on August 21, 2004 and on July 29, 2005. We now have this higher-quality version, courtesy of the Cleveland Museum of Art. - Eureka Lott 17:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment It's lovely and all, but I don't feel like voting for it as it's a big TIFF file, meaning the file size is bigger than it needs to be and thus less useful. Have you considered making a PNG version?--Peulle (talk) 17:09, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
  • I believe File:Frederic Edwin Church - Twilight in the Wilderness.jpg was downloaded from the Cleveland Museum of Art's site, and there are other (lower-resolution) files in Category:Twilight in the Wilderness. - Eureka Lott 17:14, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I would support a JPEG version. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I absolutely agree to upload this type of work (photos of paintings) in TIFF format with the aim of preserving the original colors, however, mediocre photography of a masterful painting, this painting deserves a better reproduction. --Photographer 22:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose This painting looks like a bad photograph to me, very dark and details lost in the shadow. Maybe the original is better, but at least this view is not successful. In addition, TIFF format is too heavy -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose, .TIFF format problems (I can't get it to open in Large Image Viewer, nor can I view it at full size without downloading it). Daniel Case (talk) 00:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:20, 25 January 2019 (UTC)