Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Estación de metro Toledo, Nápoles, Italia, 2023-03-26, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Estación de metro Toledo, Nápoles, Italia, 2023-03-26, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2023 at 05:51:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Julesvernex2: Exactly, the exposure time of alle 3 frames were 1,3 - 0,25 - 6 sec. For whatever reason Lr takes over the exposure time of the underexposed frame in the EXIF date when creating the HDR. I had tried to change that to the longest frame, but didn't find a way to do so. Do you have any clue? Poco a poco (talk) 15:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm afraid I have the same issue. Lightroom seems to be rather clumsy in the way it sources the data for HDR composites (e.g., often taking the name of one of the files and the EXIF of another one), I'll let you know if I figure it out. In the meantime, if you're comfortable with command-line tools, you can use exiftool to manually copy the EXIF data (if memory serves me well, the command is exiftool -TagsFromFile FromImage ToImage ) --Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • For those who are not so keen on using the command line - An open source graphic user interface for exiftools is available, which is easily locatable by punching 'GUI for exiftools' into your preferred search engine. It is no longer maintained, but gets the job done nevertheless --Virtual-Pano (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • From the Napoli Metro Website (www.anm.it - Regolamento metro/funicolari) -- 'Fotografie e/o riprese video sono consentite senza preventiva autorizzazione, a soli fini personali amatoriali' - Photography and video footage without prior authorization are for private amateur use only. --Virtual-Pano (talk) 17:57, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Only those still under copyright. I won't create the deletion request, but you can expect someone to do so. A pity, yes. But it doesn't appear that Commons will ever consent to host non-commercial-only images, much as I wish it did. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:10, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • A terrible situation. However, we should still promote this photo. I hope and demand that whoever deletes it determines first the date at which the copyright status of that metro station ends and takes care that this photo will be restored then (if Commons still exists then), just as we do with photographs of copyrighted paintings etc. Yes, that’s little consolation, but at least that must be done. --Aristeas (talk) 12:58, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I feel sure that always happens, but FPC regulars who are admins can tell us whether the process of undeletion when copyrights of buildings, sculptures, etc., run out is automatic or requires human intervention. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Metro_stations