Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Equisetum telmateia Fallätsche drops 20200507.jpg

File:Equisetum telmateia Fallätsche drops 20200507.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2020 at 06:41:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Equisetum telmateia Fallätsche drops 20200507.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Equisetum telmateia Fallätsche drops 20200507.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Equisetaceae
•  Info created by Domob - uploaded by Domob - nominated by Domob -- Domob (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment There are three other FPs of Equisetaceae, but I think all of them are quite different from this one. This picture is more "natural", and I like the bushy form of the young plant as well as the dew droplets on it. --Domob (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Domob (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Sonya7iv (talk) 13:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Distracting grass and cluttered background -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Basile, there's room for improvement in terms of composition, DoF and wow-effect Poco a poco (talk) 17:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile -- Alsakan (talk) 22:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Nice plant, but could use more isolation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I like the dew droplets. Background could be better I agree, but it's FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 02:01, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose It might yet be possible to crop in more tightly on the plant and get rid of the background as an issue. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion, I've provided an alternative. --Domob (talk) 07:51, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Alternate

•  Comment As suggested by Daniel Case, here's a tighter crop.
•  Weak support I prefer the wider crop myself, but this one seems fine to me as well. --Domob (talk) 07:51, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per above. Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:54, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Johann Jaritz, Sonya7iv, Basile Morin, Poco a poco, Alsakan, Ikan Kekek, Cmao20, what do you think about the alternative? Thanks! --Domob (talk) 09:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Normal image, not very special. Short DoF, and I still find the background cluttered -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:41, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Basile, the item itself is not so wowing. If you could have used a macro lens and focus on some drops with those nice reflections...(just to give you an idea of what could have been a special shot) Poco a poco (talk) 10:14, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Basile and Poco --Alsakan (talk) 17:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment It's better, but so far, I'm still undecided. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:04, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:50, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Ultimately, I agree with Basile's criticisms. If you could get more separation and more of the plant in sharp focus, you might have an FP, but that may not be possible with this foreground and background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:32, 8 June 2020 (UTC)