Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eiffel Tower with rainbow in Paris.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Eiffel Tower with rainbow in Paris.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2021 at 18:43:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
Info created by Marc Baronnet - uploaded by Marc Baronnet - nominated by Baronnet -- Baronnet (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Support -- Please do not confuse "featured pictures" (for which >2M pixels is sufficient : see guidelines) with "quality images" (for which technical perfection is demanded). Sharpness is useful, but there is no other pic of the Eiffel Tower under a rainbow in Commons yet, to my knowledge, hence the nomination. Baronnet (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Image is not sharp enough. Also, it would have been better as a horizontal image, to show more of the rainbow. A 14mm or wider lens is recommended if you want to show a full double rainbow. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC)- Support Pretty scene. --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose not as rare as author pretends. I have heaps of these on my phone and of similar quality and I don't even dare uploading them here. Good to show to friends on dinners though. - Benh (talk) 21:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Comment Benh, I am pretty sure that which such comments, you "friends on dinners" don't know you on "Commons"...;)--Jebulon (talk) 18:22, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Pretty moment but not a great photo, in my opinion. Featured pictures are supposed to be among the greatest on the site, not just unique on Commons for showing a double rainbow and the Eiffel Tower in the same shot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:20, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose for two reasons : 1) perspective problem (verticals should be corrected) and 2) quality issue at full resolution (artifacts, unsharp) -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per the others. It is a nice view for sure, but the quality is certainly not up to FP today. --Domob (talk) 13:35, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor quality and unfortunate framing. I expect rainbow photographs to show the entire arc unless they’re very unique, which this isn’t. --Kreuzschnabel 14:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Definitely a pretty moment that was worth recording but not FP in terms of quality or composition, a bit too much of a snapshot. Also uncorrected perspective distortion very obvious especially on the right hand side. Cmao20 (talk) 16:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Time to withdraw this nomination No new supports in three days and there's no way this is going to make up the difference the way things are going. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: Sure, it's not going to pass, but it is up to the nominator to withdrawn or not. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- I know; it's meant as a suggestion to the nominator. Daniel Case (talk) 18:35, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
