Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Distribution board and wall in workshop.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Distribution board and wall in workshop.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2017 at 20:47:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Industry#Sweden
Info Many of the features in old industrial buildings have a sculptural look to them, like this distribution board. I'm also intrigued by looking at these almost abandoned places. Some people may see them only as dirty, scruffy-looking places, but I see every dirty fingerprint, dent and scratch as memories of all those people who has worked there over the years. -- cart-Talk 20:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Support -- cart-Talk 20:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)- Support lNeverCry 22:21, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support I could swear I see some barrel distortion but meh. Cool nevertheless. -- KennyOMG (talk) 00:37, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support interesting, almost abstract. But why all the focus stacking?--Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Because my camera is not as good as yours. ;) The light conditions were very bad and I wanted to sort of document the whole wall in the way you do with a work of art, with each part as sharp as possible. The only way for me to do that was to divide the wall into nine sections for my focus point, plus two more for the different levels on the fuse boxes. I know my camera's limitations and I have to be innovative to compensate for them. --cart-Talk 10:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- oic, thanks! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:42, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support You see things in the world similarly to how I see things. WClarke 20:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry for spoiling the party but sadly it doesn't work for me. The switchbox is too small in the frame to fully appreciate the details you are talking about and the empty wall is just too boring for me. Not saying that I need explosions there, but as it is I can't appreciate it enough for FP. If everything would be a bit older and/or worn then maybe, showcasing more human influence over time. The flat light doesn't help the atmosphere, yes this is normal at the place, but photographically it's a detriment for me. A well aligned photograph of an industrial wall which I can't get enough enjoyment out of. – LucasT 20:25, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your input. We all perceive the world differently and I know this is not for everyone. :) --cart-Talk 20:36, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support Makes a nice abstract pattern. Daniel Case (talk) 23:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - I basically agree with Lucas on this. I've lived with this photo since you nominated it, and my reaction really hasn't wavered: "OK, it's a scuffed gray wall with some stuff on the left side". Now had you focused more narrowly on the switchbox, that might have interested me enough to vote for a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per others - I neither understand the composition, nor am I wowed by this in any way --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:23, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --Karelj (talk) 21:42, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --Ermell (talk) 08:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I'd better get this out if sight since it is so offensive to so many users. 
--cart-Talk 10:44, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
