Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Danaus genutia 06847.JPG

File:Danaus genutia 06847.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2015 at 14:29:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Danaus genutia 06847.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Danaus genutia 06847.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
•  Info The Common Tiger (Danaus genutia). Created by Vengolis - uploaded by Vengolis - nominated by Jkadavoor -- Jee 14:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jee 14:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:03, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:41, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
• Could you do a bit of sharpening? --The Photographer (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

  He has not much knowledge about processing of files. Any help/advise is highly appreciated and can be on his talk page too. (I've a private conversation and suggested him to shoot RAW. He has two more photos of the same subject; but I think WB is too red there.) Jee 01:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

   Done @Jkadavoor: @Vengolis: I uploaded a sharpened version, feel free to revert if it's not good. -- Christian Ferrer 07:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

  Thanks Christian. He is not well and probably offline as he told to me yesterday. Jee 08:32, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry to hear this, my thoughts are with him/her. Maybe a carefull rewiewer like @Laitche: can say its opinion on the last version. -- Christian Ferrer 08:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

@Christian why me... but OK. I can say a sharp is a sharp so cannot increase the details, as far as I see the last version, sharpness is better but not so big improving and a little bit loss details and also a little bit gain noises so overall I cannot say which is better... But in this case I think they should respect creator's intention, just my opinion :) --Laitche (talk) 17:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

@Laitche: why you? because I know you're always try to be picky, and I thank you for that! You confirms here what I suspected this is not really a real improvement so I reverted, this image can not be more sharpened without overprocessing so it's better to keep the first version which is not unsharp, thank you again for your contribution :). -- Christian Ferrer 21:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Picky!? I prefer other word... and I'm not trying to be picky, Haha. Well, it's alright, thanks. --Laitche (talk) 02:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Jkadavoor, @Vengolis: Upload the RAW file to commonsarchive, and I will make a how-to. I invite you to read this guide about RAW files for your camera. You can read this guide about focus too. --The Photographer (talk) 12:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Jkadavoor, The Photographer for your great help and support.Unfortunately all those pics shot in JPEG.@The Photographer i am a newbie in photography and so much in need for help. Vengolis (talk) 06:44, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Not very details but nice dressing. --Laitche (talk) 08:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer 07:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Superb. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 09:26, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 16:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 18:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:13, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera