Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crëpes de Puez vaciaria Val Badia Südtirol.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Crëpes de Puez vaciaria Val Badia Südtirol.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 21:37:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Italy
Info Alpine meadows under the Pütia peak, the Puez range in Val Badia, South Tyrol - Unesco World Heritage Dolomites, Puez-Geisler Nature Park. All by me Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:37, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:37, 19 November 2019 (UTC)- Support Very nice. Is this a stitched Panorama or has your Hasselblad really 103MPix? -- -donald- (talk) 08:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support A really beautiful view, from flowers in the foreground to the high peaks in the background. I also love the winding track which leads through the image. --Aristeas (talk) 10:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support Obviously great. Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support Easy on the eyes. Composition is great. --Dinkum (talk) 12:59, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment I assume this is stitched panorama? The frame 2/3 along is blurred. You can see it on the huts and mountain portion. Perhaps shutter-shock? Do you have another frame to use? -- Colin (talk) 14:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Oppose The alignment is not correct. According to the calculation, the Cunturines should never appear in a higher perspective than the Furchetta. The coordinates are inaccurate. From the indicated place these mountains are not visible. Problems with unsharp frame. --Milseburg (talk) 15:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Done You are right, I corrected the coordinates, the perspective might not be very accurate --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice scenery, but sadly the left foreground is too blurry for me. --Ivar (talk) 18:28, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with Ivar, the first frame is really blurry, you should crop it. Some of the other frames are not great, but still acceptable to me given the image resolution Poco a poco (talk) 20:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks a little overexposed to me. Especially to be seen on the way in the foreground. I also think the sharpness in the left foreground is unacceptable for an excellent photo. (Compare the sharpness in the middle and right) Je-str (talk) 21:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Even after looking three times on three different displays, I cannot find an overexposed area on the way in the foreground. --Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness as others. Too much is too blurry. --Hockei (talk) 07:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Very weak regretful oppose because of the unsharpness in the foreground left of center. Daniel Case (talk) 06:20, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose. I think we'll always want to be careful when judging pixel-level sharpness on mega-panoramas. That said, I've downloaded the image and reduced it 50% linearly (25.8 MP) and still found the bottom left to be unacceptably blurry, albeit just barely. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:27, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support Some parts are indeed blurred, but in my opinion they are not too significant. Very nice composition and landscape! --Domob (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Milseburg (talk) 12:31, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
