Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Comercio en la plaza del 9 de abril de 1947, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 78.JPG

File:Comercio en la plaza del 9 de abril de 1947, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 78.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2016 at 03:59:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Comercio en la plaza del 9 de abril de 1947, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 78.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Comercio en la plaza del 9 de abril de 1947, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 78.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info Grocery and cosmetics shop in the April 9th 1947 Square, better known as Grand Socco, Tangier, Morocco. All by me, Poco² 03:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 03:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I like it. A shop and its proprietor. Challenging light conditions. Someone might object to the resolution of the man, but in context, it's good enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice atmosphere. I like how all the items are nicely arranged, the symphony of colors, and the pose of the man. Seems like it has been dificult to denoise (ISO 800) without leading to bleeding of colors. A reasonable compromise has been applied in the processing IMO. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:05, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support − Meiræ 22:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but for me nothing special, and the man's expression is not particularly interesting either. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:14, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Nice to see something a bit different -- Thennicke (talk) 12:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per KoH. INeverCry 18:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
• weak  Oppose nice image but the bottom is a bit too busy Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:50, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Colin (talk) 16:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --The Photographer (talk) 20:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose There is the potential for an excellent image in this scene, but imho this one is not it. Maybe more zoom to get rid of the ceiling and that blue stool … --El Grafo (talk) 09:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

  I disagree. In that case I'd lose a lot of perspective, and my intention was actually to have as much as possible with lines guiding to the seller. Poco² 10:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Per Slaunger. I struggled over this one, but it came down to two things: I don't agree with requiring blind technical precision and if this were my photo, it would be one of my favorites. -- Ram-Man 03:23, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support So often I have seen small shops like this, usually abroad but sometimes here in the U.S., and wondered if one of them might make an FP-quality image one day. I wonder no longer. I don't mind a thing about this—the perspective lines are great, we see enough of this shop but just enough, and it's fun at high-res to look over everything on the shelves. I also give Paco credit for a proper white balance ... was there any work required on that afterwards? Because if you had a fluorescent setting available, you didn't need it or chose not to use it. Daniel Case (talk) 05:51, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

  Daniel: I looked it up, no, I didn't have to apply any changes on the WB. Thank you for your comments! Poco² 18:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Halavar (talk) 13:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Maire (talk) 18:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors