Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of St. Teresa Ceiling, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Church of St. Teresa Ceiling, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2015 at 17:32:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of St. Teresa ceiling. Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • What do you mean by that? Flowers are flowers, planes are planes, ceilings are ceilings. How can you make it more interesting? It is a great capture of the ceiling decorations (one of the finest in Wikipedia) and there really is nothing more to be done. It is technically perfect. I think your opposing reason is not suitable to be counted because it is way too abstract and without arguments. -- Pofka (talk) 10:11, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The subject has to matter, clearly, as much as anything else in the photo. It has to be a great-looking image overall. It's not possible to take a FP of every subject imaginable, even if you capture the subject very well. So I understand if you disagree with me, but I don't follow what you mean with your rather fundamental criticism of my reasoning. — Julian H. 10:17, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps I should add: I don't mean "interesting" in an intellectual manner or anything like that, just visually. — Julian H. 10:19, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I meant that your argument is way too abstract. For me, the church interior is way more interesting than planes or paintings, however I will not oppose the picture only because the subject is not very interesting FOR ME. Furthermore, POTY is always divided into the various categories: plants, landscapes and so on, so as the featured pictures. Don't compare church with planes or landscapes. This is just incomparable. The main question, at least for me: "Is this picture among the most valued pictures in its category?". I think in this way it is much more objective. -- Pofka (talk) 13:59, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm comparing this to other curches and even other church ceilings. — Julian H. 14:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Then probably our tastes varies. Lets see what the others thinks. -- Pofka (talk) 14:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Julian, I'm not sure exactly what issues you had with the image, but I've reprocessed it as I think the image was a bit dark and lifeless before. I suspect your opinion won't change but I invite you to have another look just in case. ;-) Diliff (talk) 10:40, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Neutral at least, with the less dark appearance. — Julian H. 11:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /KTC (talk) 22:54, 17 March 2015 (UTC)) 22:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors