Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chachani, Peru ESA413331.tiff

File:Chachani, Peru ESA413331.tiff, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2021 at 14:33:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Chachani, Peru ESA413331.tiff Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chachani, Peru ESA413331.tiff

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images#South America
•  Info created by European Space Agency - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 14:33, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:33, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Commonists 20:38, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

• Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 17:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose I would prefer to feature a JPG or PNG version of this image that does not automatically download a giant file to your computer after accidentally clicking it. Buidhe (talk) 02:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
  • @Buidhe: There is also a jpg version that is much smaller (3MB). There was no noticeable difference in quality on the screen of my phone between the two versions, however it is better to check on large screens for a more detailed look. --IamMM (talk) 09:45, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
    • I am not seeing jpg artifacts on it so I would support that one, or otherwise png is a lossless file format that has smaller file sizes due to lossless compression and more compatibility with web browsers that tiff. Buidhe (talk) 13:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I have downloaded the tiff and converted it to a png-file, File:Chachani, Peru ESA413331.png, all the formats are now also linked on the file pages. If you like, you can add the png (or jpg) as an 'Alternative' here on this nom and see if that works better. If you don't know how an 'Alt.' is done, just tell me and I'll fix it for you. --Cart (talk) 22:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

  Thank you Cart, put the alternatives as you see fit. I prefer the PNG version as the main candidate. --IamMM (talk) 09:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

• Fixed The main version is always the original nom, but that doesn't matter for voters, they will choose the version they prefer. --Cart (talk) 09:17, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 06:45, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I understand there is educational value to the shading of different kinds of vegetation, and that it was done with near-infrared. But while spectacular, when we have so many spectacular ESA images being nominated I have a hard time supporting one that attracted me with false coloring. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:27, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Great picture. If ESA feels that 16-bit color depth is needed then I have no problem believing it. TIFF doesn't necessarily compress natural images worse than PNG, they both primarily use the deflate algorithm. --Trougnouf (talk) 20:33, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Support with preference for the TIFF but I will support both. Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Cbrescia (talk) 13:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I prefer the original TIFF but for a purpose such as POTD the PNG would be better. Is the difference in coloring between PNG and TIFF thumbnails a bug of the thumbnail generation software? --Askeuhd (talk) 08:48, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Buidhe --RolfHill (talk) 12:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info Png-version of the file per request from IamMM. 'Pinging' previous voters for this change: Commonists, Buidhe, Daniel Case, Gnosis. --Cart (talk) 09:14, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 10:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

• Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 17:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Buidhe (talk) 13:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Great photo. (But I am fine with both versions.) --Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for making the png. version. --Gnosis (talk) 22:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Cbrescia (talk) 13:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 05:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --RolfHill (talk) 12:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:33, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Basile Morin (talk) 00:13, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite images#South America

The chosen alternative is: File:Chachani,_Peru_ESA413331.png