Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Salisbury, Salisbury, Inglaterra, 2014-08-12, DD 49.JPG

File:Catedral de Salisbury, Salisbury, Inglaterra, 2014-08-12, DD 49.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2015 at 18:37:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Salisbury, Salisbury, Inglaterra, 2014-08-12, DD 49.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Salisbury, Salisbury, Inglaterra, 2014-08-12, DD 49.JPG

2646

910

272

213

3544

5497

Dust spot

1205

2116

142

142

3544

5497

Dust spot

•  Info View of the spire and cloister of the Salisbury Cathedral, located in the city of Salisbury, Wiltshire, England. The temple, an Anglican cathedral, is one of the leading examples of Early English architecture and was consecrated in 1258. Its 123 m (404 feet) spire is the tallest in the United Kingdom. Poco² 18:37, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

View of the spire and cloister of the Salisbury Cathedral, located in the city of Salisbury, Wiltshire, England. The temple, an Anglican cathedral, is one of the leading examples of Early English architecture and was consecrated in 1258. Its 123 m (404 feet) spire is the tallest in the United Kingdom.

•  Support -- Poco² 18:37, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support unusual perspective - that totally works for me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--Nikhil (talk) 07:36, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support i love this kind of perspective --LivioAndronico talk 12:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:43, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Please check for dust spots carefully, I have marked two of them. --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:28, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

  You're right, thanks, will fix them tomorrow evening Poco² 10:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

   Dust spots removed sorry for the delay Poco² 20:30, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Llez (talk) 20:19, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Good idea with the framing. Very nice composition. You have a lot of color noise in the shadows, I guess from raising the shadows. Could you try to address that? Alternatively, instead of lifting the shadows, what would happen by leaving them dark? Would it emphasize the framing? -- Slaunger (talk) 09:02, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Love the composition, but the edges of the building look overprocessed. Daniel Case (talk) 13:41, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

  I reworked the fringe between sky and the shadows a bit to reduce the oversharpening effect Poco² 20:30, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Much better now. Daniel Case (talk) 02:38, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Sharpening (or desaturation of the blue?) fringe is very visible. The spire at least should be vertical. Thoughts about ?--Jebulon (talk) 22:37, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

  I have applied a slight tilt and reduced sharpening in the areas with high contrast Poco² 20:41, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support--Σπάρτακος (talk) 14:16, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 10:13, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings