Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Capitol del Estado de Indiana, Indianápolis, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-22, DD 04.jpg

File:Capitol del Estado de Indiana, Indianápolis, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-22, DD 04.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2015 at 19:07:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Capitol del Estado de Indiana, Indianápolis, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-22, DD 04.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Capitol del Estado de Indiana, Indianápolis, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-22, DD 04.jpg

•  Info Front view of the Indiana Statehouse, the state capitol building of the U.S. state of Indiana. The building, built in 1888, houses the Indiana General Assembly, the office of the Governor of Indiana, the Supreme Court of Indiana, and other state officials. The building it is located in Indianapolis, the state capital. All by me, Poco² 19:07, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 19:07, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment The perspective is a few strange --LivioAndronico talk 19:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support. Seems pretty sharp actually considering it was taken at f/16. I would have expected a bit more diffraction softness. Diliff (talk) 20:14, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support If Is good for David, probably that I wrong --LivioAndronico talk 21:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice symmetry but I would have moved forward to get the trees out of the way. Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Daniel Case, have you really considered the effect of moving forward? A little further forward and there's a great big statue dominating your vision and obscuring the building, and the trees probably aren't completely out of the frame. Go in front of the statue and you'd struggle to fit the building in-frame or achieve a reasonable rectilinear image, and the two other trees would start to dominate. -- Colin (talk) 11:38, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
    • I fully agree with Colin. I can offer other perspectives ([1], [2]), but believe me moving forward was not an option. Btw, I have uploaded a new version with an improvement of the perspective. Poco² 19:09, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

I actually like those other two a little bit more, if you'd been able to get the treetops in. It's really a matter of taste. Sometimes the perfect angle you'd like is just impossible. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Very much so. Many buildings (particularly in London) don't give you the ability to step back and photograph from an ideal angle, you typically end up with light poles, street signs, awkward angles and lots of perspective distortion. It is a matter of taste but I don't think Poco's alternative images show the building better. This one seems to be the least obstructed view of the building. Diliff (talk) 07:08, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 21:48, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:54, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment It's a colour noise on the bottom right window shade, isn't it. --Laitche (talk) 10:02, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

• Laitche: I have reduced the CN in a preventive way but withouth really seeing it. If it is still there in the current version, could you please add a note? There was also a bit of Moiré, I reduced it. Poco² 12:24, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

• Yeah, it's maybe a Moiré. I don't mind whether you remove or not. --Laitche (talk) 12:33, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

• OK, it's removed. --Laitche (talk) 12:47, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support I don't fancy the tight crop and both trees but I know how difficult to take this building, and hope you to find more impressive angle in the future :) --Laitche (talk) 06:24, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose The trees are disturbing. Not your fault, but... Yann (talk) 18:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:13, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 06:49, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture