Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canadian Parliament at night.jpg

File:Canadian Parliament at night.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2017 at 16:15:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Canadian Parliament at night.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canadian Parliament at night.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info Parliament of Canada (Centre Block) at night. Created, uploaded and nominated by Sergey Pesterev -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 16:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 16:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Please fix the converging lines making it look tilted backwards. I personally despise the need to correct them every goddam time when shooting architecture, especially in extreme cases, but when they are so slight the illusion is not pretty. – Lucas^T 16:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral Need verticals fix --The Photographer 16:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Done Verticals corrected -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 20:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Thanks, it now look better!, however, a small sugestion and I can't underestand and I need to know if it was the naturals colors because it look too green. If it was the natural colors I will change my vote to support. --The Photographer 13:24, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

@The Photographer: I fixed a green tint, but I think it will be a problem to get natural colors due to artificial light. -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 14:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Comparing this with other photos of the parliament at night, I seems yours is too yellow. Do you have any good arguments for this? It does look like wrong WB and/or oversaturated if you ask me. – Lucas^T 21:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

@Lucasbosch: I uploaded version with corrected WB. But as far as I can remember, the light bulbs near parliament had a warm yellowish tint. -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 22:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Although I would like to know about the WB issues. Daniel Case (talk) 22:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral Don't like the overexposed lights and the noise. -- -donald- (talk) 08:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral It is an ok photo, but the colors make it look sickly, like an old haunted house or something, and the overdone perspective correction is not helping (the sides are now leaning out instead of in, they should be straight). --cart-Talk 12:38, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others' objections, especially cart. I saw this building last summer. It's magnificent and memorable. I don't think this photo does justice to it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:30, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
• Sort of fixed Sergey, I've fix a version of this with a WB based on some of the white objects (a taxi, some signs) in the photo. I also nudged the spectrum from violet to more blue and fixed the verticals. The version is in my dropbox, feel free to use it any way you like if you want to (as inspiration or just to download). Don't forget to 'ping' the voters if you decide to do this radical change to the photo. --cart-Talk 10:52, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I find the postprocessing on the building to be overcontrasty and slightly unrealistic. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 3 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:44, 12 March 2017 (UTC)