Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buiobuione - India - Jaipur - Galtaji Temple - monkey.tif
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Buiobuione - India - Jaipur - Galtaji Temple - monkey.tif, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2018 at 16:30:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Cercopithecidae_(Old_World_monkeys)
Info created by Buiobuione - uploaded by Buiobuione - nominated by [[User:{{subst:Buiobuione}}|]] -- Buiobuione (talk) 16:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Support -- Buiobuione (talk) 16:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Oppose Very grainy from ISO 1000 Charles (talk) 22:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)- Oppose Can't look at it in large image viewer because it's a .tif, but I'll take Charles' word for the graininess; besides, we have a lot of pictures like this already and it just doesn't stand out. Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per Daniel Case - it's not outstanding.--Peulle (talk) 07:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support objection, gents! Yes, the image is grainy but its resolution is huge. So don't pixelpeep at 100% - just scale down a bit and everything's fine. The composition is very appealing imo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- It's a tiff file, hence the huge size. Resolution is only normal. The sharpness is poor as well as the graininess problem. Charles (talk) 12:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- 6,000 × 4,000 is much better than the average resolution for a subject of this kind - and the absolute max res the 80D offers --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support Lovely! I agree with Martin, quality looks fine. -- B2Belgium (talk) 09:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- reluctant oppose This is certainly not a bad picture, much better than anything I have ever been able to achieve in this direction. The noise is acceptable for me at sizes suitable for normal viewing, but its over-all quality is nothing to be excited about. The subject is cute, but it has tough competition in that department and, as already mentioned above, it doesn't really manage to stand out there. The composition is a bit too centred for my taste, a tighter crop on the left and more en:lead room on the right would be more pleasing imho. The dark eyes and lack of a en:Catch light make it appear a bit less … well … lively than other pictures we've seen here before. You could certainly argue that these are just minor details, but I think these details are what separates a very good from a oh my Bob, this is awesome picture. --El Grafo (talk) 16:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Comment Thank you all for your opinions and dedicated time to view my picture - Buiobuione 14:02, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment but please sign it -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 21:39, 18 January 2018 (UTC)