Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Building of the Salins de Frontignan 14.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Building of the Salins de Frontignan 14.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2015 at 18:49:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info All by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer 18:49, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Same place as this recently promoted image however I took the freedom to nominate also this one because the composition is is quite different and interesting IMO. -- Christian Ferrer 18:49, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Christian Ferrer 18:49, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Extend content
OpposeI think it is pathetic when photographers upload, nominate, and vote for their own photos. Too me it is like nominating yourself to an Oscar. Just saying... --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 18:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)- If it could be true. Just saying... -- Christian Ferrer 19:02, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Christian Ferrer: This user is opposing without reason. See Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:G. Dury - Portrait of Dom Augusto, Duke of Leuchtenberg - Google Art Project.jpg, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amolação interrompida by Jose Ferraz de Almeida Júnior 1894.jpg/2, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Mary's Church, Radcliffe Sq, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pažaislis Monastery interior dome, Kaunas, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Denis Mukwege par Claude Truong-Ngoc novembre 2014.jpg and more. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:25, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Users don't have to write comments when they oppose, support, etc. Therefore, your comment above about my is completely irrelevant. --Oldnewnew (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- ArionEstar, you do the exactly opposite, so why he can do not do what he is doing? And you supports or nominates for no reason, or bad reasons, and for me this even worst, because you, Livio and others are transforming the FP in political support, or "friendly" support, and them many bad pictures are becoming FP. In the other hand, this guy is not a barrier to good photos...
- Users don't have to write comments when they oppose, support, etc. Therefore, your comment above about my is completely irrelevant. --Oldnewnew (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Christian Ferrer: This user is opposing without reason. See Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:G. Dury - Portrait of Dom Augusto, Duke of Leuchtenberg - Google Art Project.jpg, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amolação interrompida by Jose Ferraz de Almeida Júnior 1894.jpg/2, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Mary's Church, Radcliffe Sq, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pažaislis Monastery interior dome, Kaunas, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Denis Mukwege par Claude Truong-Ngoc novembre 2014.jpg and more. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:25, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- If it could be true. Just saying... -- Christian Ferrer 19:02, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Both are opposite side of the same coin, a coin that I do not see any kind of value... -- RTA 21:21, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Ma finiscila e piangi di meno --LivioAndronico talk 14:42, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Strong support Very well composed, photographed, colored, "painted". ;) 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:31, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 19:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support Without doubts --LivioAndronico talk 20:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Lovely composition, but I feel the WB may be a little too yellow and a little too green. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:25, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: , Done, thanks, new slightly modified version. -- Christian Ferrer 09:22, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:44, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: , Done, thanks, new slightly modified version. -- Christian Ferrer 09:22, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry Christian, but I see a design problem: too much foreground, building too small, the ratio is unfavorable. A better crop can be (perhaps?) improve this problem, a bit. But the main: no wow for me. What is the main of this image: the ruine or the salt evaporation pond or what else? The ruine is too small and I can't see the salt evaporation pond. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support At a first sight I was thinking like Alchemist here, somethig could be wrong watching so much land than sky... but, I can see three parts in the picture, sky, houses and horizont and the water with this "grass stones".. I think those both bring the leverage to the picture --Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 16:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:22, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- KTC (talk) 13:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 14:43, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- mrtony77 (talk) 17:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Halavar (talk) 11:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 14:29, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support I keep coming back to this one. - Benh (talk) 10:40, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural