Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 panorama 2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 panorama 2.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2015 at 19:18:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
- Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Nice plants! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:26, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Nice Japanese Hill-and-Pond (this subject is a bit ordinary for me , Japanese wisteria and azalea is a bit odd combination for me but no problem.) --Laitche (talk) 19:51, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Colors - simply brilliant. -- Pofka (talk) 19:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico talk 20:50, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Maybe some "botanical" category would be more appropriate. --Mile (talk) 21:59, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- It's a bit awkward; Commons:Featured pictures/Plants is for specific species, not a whole collection of different plants. Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural isn't really correct either, since this is a man-made garden. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Unsharp, crop on top too tight, should have encompased the round of the trees. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:17, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Your later comments are valid concerns (though in my defense, it was a cloudy day and I intentionally excluded the sky, while a sunny day would have robbed the greenery of its saturation). But unsharp? This is a manual-focus telephoto used by the pros in the 1970s, equaling the best of today. I don't believe I missed the focus on any of the frames. Remember that plants have low apparent sharpness (look at any FPC on this page that has both buildings and plants in it, and I can guarantee you the buildings look sharper). Moreover, this is a 46MP image. Anyways, thanks for the review. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Question What lens did you use? Full frame camera? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:26, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- The Nikon 80-200mm f/4.5 AI on a D7000. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Don´t get me wrong, it is a nice picture, but not FP for me. A crop of 1/8 of the bottom image would enhance the image a lot IMO. Crop halfway the reflection of second rock on left to bottom. Leave the red flower reflections in their entirity and a little bit of the bottom reflections, just a tad... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:35, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Question What lens did you use? Full frame camera? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:26, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Your later comments are valid concerns (though in my defense, it was a cloudy day and I intentionally excluded the sky, while a sunny day would have robbed the greenery of its saturation). But unsharp? This is a manual-focus telephoto used by the pros in the 1970s, equaling the best of today. I don't believe I missed the focus on any of the frames. Remember that plants have low apparent sharpness (look at any FPC on this page that has both buildings and plants in it, and I can guarantee you the buildings look sharper). Moreover, this is a 46MP image. Anyways, thanks for the review. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I felt that I should comment so I will explain. This is Japanese style garden as you can see this. They can see this kind of garden at many places in Japan, exclusive restaurants, residences, tiny parks or like that, many and any places around my house. On the other hand Japanese garden like this (description of that scenery), they can see a few places in each prefecture, at large shinto shrine or large temple or famous Japanese gardens, like can see this site so these are totally different :) --Laitche (talk) 11:06, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support ok for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Frankly, the plants here are sharper than a lot of what I've seen in my own work (and at FP). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:42, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support OK. :-) --XRay talk 16:15, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Not perfect, but more right than wrong in this one. Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Graphium 21:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges