Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berliner Fernsehturm (Detailansicht).jpg

File:Berliner Fernsehturm (Detailansicht).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 14:04:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Berliner Fernsehturm (Detailansicht).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berliner Fernsehturm (Detailansicht).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
•  Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 14:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf im Wald 14:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support — Julian H.^✈ 15:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 12:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent! Superb resolution, colors, sharpness. No blown out highlights (difficult task on the metal plates). --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 19:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Colin (talk) 20:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 03:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 08:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special. Please see the result of this nomination.--Jebulon (talk) 20:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  • I agree with Jebulon that the composition is nothing special, and one could complain about it being just the upper part of the tower. It seems this is a popular subject for our FP crowd, with loads of good quality images! This gaudy image shows potential for a great city composition. The other picture Jebulon linked had the advantage of being taken from a high vantage point, so the angle of view was much better than this one. But the other image is less than 10MP and fairly sharp whereas this one is more than 70MP and extremely sharp. While that doesn't matter much if I print A4 or view the whole thing on a monitor, this picture allows me to explore the structure in a way that is highly educational to see how it is made and what has been stuck onto it. In our digital world, I can appreciate such a picture in more ways than just standing back and observing the whole thing. Here, I can see as much detail as Spiderman. That is why I think it is worth FP. -- Colin (talk) 20:44, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
    • Also, this one has better light (bottom of the "sphere" is less dark), the colours look much more natural and the top crop is nicer. — Julian H.^✈ 21:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support----Isasza (talk) 21:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 23:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 10:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers