Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bergtocht van Prasüras,door het Val Trupchun naar Alp Purcher 18-09-2019. (d.j.b) 05.jpg

File:Bergtocht van Prasüras,door het Val Trupchun naar Alp Purcher 18-09-2019. (d.j.b) 05.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2019 at 15:54:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bergtocht van Prasüras,door het Val Trupchun naar Alp Purcher 18-09-2019. (d.j.b) 05.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bergtocht van Prasüras,door het Val Trupchun naar Alp Purcher 18-09-2019. (d.j.b) 05.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland
•  Info The bridge and the mountain path invite you to explore the Swiss National Park.
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral It is a nice idea with the bridge and the winding path in the background, but the composition still feels a bit unbalanced to me. The close and large bridge on the right seems a bit "too strong" for the very narrow and far away path on the left. --Domob (talk) 16:38, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment @Domob: you for your comment. You may find the alternative photo Better.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:55, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Neutral This might be a mere matter of taste so I don’t give an oppose for that – I just would love to see more to the left side (where the riverbed leads to). So shortly, the framing is too tight for me. This composition suggests the bridge being the main subject, exactly in the thirds, but then there’s too little visible of it. --Kreuzschnabel 14:28, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment @Kreuzschnabel: you for your comment. You may find the alternative photo Better.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:55, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Nice composition. Cmao20 (talk) 21:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Ultimately, this one doesn't really work for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose A good recording, but unfortunately for me no FP--Fischer.H (talk) 16:44, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Alternative, another version

•  Support--Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 17:27, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I find this version much better. I like the composition. --Dinkum (talk) 18:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral Sorry to spoil the party but I much prefer the other one. This is a much more conventional composition, and the bridge is quite small in the frame and looks a bit lost. Cmao20 (talk) 21:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - This one does work for me. My eye moves across the bridge, across the trees and then can go any number of ways, and I love how the stream is a diagonal that comes closer to bisecting this composition, but it's just low enough to work perfectly with the hills on the upper left. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. I also love the fading-summer mood ... I want to follow those hikers down the path. Daniel Case (talk) 00:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support A far better composition. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:35, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support Much better! Another idea: What about a crop that is as wide as this, but only as high as the other? In other words, include more on the left, but not top/bottom. Maybe that would be the best balance? (But yeah, it is probably a matter of taste in the end.) --Domob (talk) 06:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Answer: this photo was made with a focal point of 18 mm. The photo above has a focal length of 27 mm. That is zoomed in.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 03:20, 12 December 2019 (UTC))

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland

The chosen alternative is: File:Bergtocht_van_Prasüras,door_het_Val_Trupchun_naar_Alp_Purcher_18-09-2019._(d.j.b)_04.jpg