Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bergtocht van Peio Paese naar Lago Covel (1,839 m) in het Nationaal park Stelvio (Italië). Lago Covel (1,839 m).jpg

File:Bergtocht van Peio Paese naar Lago Covel (1,839 m) in het Nationaal park Stelvio (Italië). Lago Covel (1,839 m).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2017 at 06:05:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bergtocht van Peio Paese naar Lago Covel (1,839 m) in het Nationaal park Stelvio (Italië). Lago Covel (1,839 m).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bergtocht van Peio Paese naar Lago Covel (1,839 m) in het Nationaal park Stelvio (Italië). Lago Covel (1,839 m).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info Mountain walk from Pejo to Lago Covel (1,839 m) in the Stelvio National Park (Italy). Lago Covel (1,839 m). All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Stunning. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent although a longer exposure would have helped to make an even clearer reflection and smoother clouds, but that may be a matter of taste and you certainly would have needed a ND filter. --Code (talk) 06:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - The composition has a nice circular motion if you let it, but the main reason to feature this is just because it's such a stunning (as KoH said) image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 09:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 09:47, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Though possibly pushed the vibrance slider a little too far for my taste (the green is rather fluorescent). -- Colin (talk) 13:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --cart-Talk 13:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice, though I agree with Colin that the green may be not quite right. Charles (talk)
•  Support Very good! I'm wondering if the WB could be improved a bit... --Basotxerri (talk) 16:07, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
• Note: thanks for the comment. If everyone agrees with it, I can change the WB something.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 19:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support May be a touch of yellow, but good composition - and the necessary Wow.--XRay ^talk 20:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Piling on. --Yann (talk) 22:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -g. balaxaZe★ 23:02, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Mooie weerspiegeling --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 10:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:46, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural