Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basilica of Saint Clotilde Interior, Paris, France - Diliff.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Basilica of Saint Clotilde Interior, Paris, France - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2019 at 16:12:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The interior of the Basilica of Saint Clotilde in Paris, France.
Suggestion for Set-nomination by Paris 16

Please note, if you comment on this, do not use the vote templates since they will be counted in the normal nom.

  •  Suggestion Set nom name: Interior of Basilique Sainte-Clotilde de Paris
Files included:
  • {{Support}} Maybe a set is a better choice--Paris 16 (talk) 17:18, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • {{n}} Perhaps, but I'm not sure. The previous church-interior sets I've seen have been strict and complete in scope, such as the York Minster set or the Hereford Cathedral set. In both those examples, the set was a pair of views of the nave of the church in opposite directions, which is a complete scope for a set. But in this case we have the nave along with the sanctuary, and I'm not sure that makes a complete set. Why, for example, include the sanctuary and not the choir, or the organ, or the lady chapel? The answer is because Diliff didn't choose to take those pictures, but it means that the set is less a set and more 'images of this church that we happen to have.' I'm also not convinced the sanctuary image is as good as the other one because of the distortion of the lamps, although it is still FP to me. So I think I will reserve judgment on whether a set is a good idea here. Cmao20 (talk) 17:33, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info @Cmao20 and Paris 16: You two need to figure out how you want this: File or Set. If 'Set', you need to withdraw this nom and start a Set-nom. A set can't be an "Alt" on a normal nom; the code, procedure and Bot-things are designed differently for these two options. Please, have a think and make the right kind of nom to save us from the mess that will otherwise follow. Thanks, --Cart (talk) 18:04, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @W.carter: , as I said above, the set is not an idea I'm especially keen on and I don't think I shall withdraw this nomination and renominate as a set. How should I sort this out so that the nomination looks like it did when I set it up? Cmao20 (talk) 18:10, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cmao20, since it is your nom, you are in charge of it, and since you ask me, I will fix it so that it can continue as a normal nom. Paris 16 should have asked you if it was ok to add an "Alt" before doing this. This is mendable, but please keep in mind to always ask first, it is good manners and it makes for less cleaning up. :-) --Cart (talk) 18:22, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:16, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings