Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bald eagle at the Hawk Conservancy Trust 2.jpg

File:Bald eagle at the Hawk Conservancy Trust 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2015 at 20:02:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bald eagle at the Hawk Conservancy Trust 2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bald eagle at the Hawk Conservancy Trust 2.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
•  Info created by Lewis Hulbert - uploaded by Lewis Hulbert - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:02, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:02, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak support The eye and half of the face are in shadow but nice portrait (format is landscape though...), imho. --Laitche (talk) 20:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:12, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Majestic. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 02:39, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 04:30, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's a very nice portrait without a doubt, but we have a few very similar photos as FPs and in my eyes, many of them have similar quality and better light. — Julian H.^✈ 06:37, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good composition and sharpness, but simply too dark. I would change my vote to support if anyone would brighten the picture a little bit (without loss of quality, of course). --Code (talk) 15:45, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Added a brightened version, how's that? --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:41, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Support -- Rainbow unicorn (talk) 16:56, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Julian H. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:41, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose This version anyway. Not sure yet about the alt below. -- Yann (talk) 21:21, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Eyes too dark. -- RTA 21:46, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose too dark for FP, only QI --Atamari (talk) 22:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Code. --Tremonist (talk) 13:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info Brightened version. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:40, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 18:30, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:14, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:43, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:19, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 12:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Great close-up. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:17, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Eyes also too dark. This should be the bights part of the photo, with some burn and dodge tools (a more pro edition), this could be a good photo. -- RTA 21:46, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose too dark for FP, only QI --Atamari (talk) 22:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:49, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 09:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:17, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

The chosen alternative is: File:Bald eagle at the Hawk Conservancy Trust 2-2.jpg