Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Balaenoptera physalus skeleton - Salinas del Carmen.jpg

File:Balaenoptera physalus skeleton - Salinas del Carmen.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2015 at 13:07:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Balaenoptera physalus skeleton - Salinas del Carmen.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Balaenoptera physalus skeleton - Salinas del Carmen.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones, shells and fossils
•  Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 13:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 13:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:25, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:32, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico talk 15:39, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good and valuable. --Mile (talk) 18:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:42, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support, but a little less luminance noise reduction would help in my opinion. — Julian H.^✈ 09:06, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Done --Llez (talk) 11:11, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
    • Nice, thanks. — Julian H.^✈ 11:46, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 10:04, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:37, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. The shadows are a bit harsh, but I don't see how one could have done better. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:09, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:35, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Regretful oppose Image definitely has wow. And I agree about the shadows. But the supports are unsharp and have CA in many spots. Daniel Case (talk) 17:46, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please make annotations where you see CAs at the supports --Llez (talk) 07:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Upon further review it may just have been a byproduct of looking at this image with my reading glasses on. However, the unsharpness remains and the whole thing still looks a little overprocessed to me. Daniel Case (talk) 16:58, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:24, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 17:55, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Bones, shells and fossils