Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ayuntamiento, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 141-143 HDR.jpg

File:Ayuntamiento, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 141-143 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2015 at 20:05:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ayuntamiento, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 141-143 HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ayuntamiento, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 141-143 HDR.jpg

791

895

506

727

5696

3892

strange light halos

2400

246

519

1518

5696

3892

light halos on border

4424

727

415

1349

5696

3892

light halos on border

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info Front view of the city Hall of A Coruña, also called Municipal Palace, during the blue hour, Galicia, Spain. The modernist building is located in the María Pita Square in the center of the city and was built between 1908 and 1912 following a design of Pedro Ramiro Mariño. It was inaugurated in 1927 by the king Alfonso XIII. The facade is 64 metres (210 ft) width and has 43 windows, whereas the surface of the building is 2,300 m² (24,757.0 sq ft). The 4 statues in the third floor represent the 4 provinces of Galicia (A Coruña, Lugo, Orense and Pontevedra) and over them, in the middle, is the coat of arms of the city. The 2 dames flanking it symbolize Peace and Industry and Work and Wisdom. In the tower in the middle is the clock and the bells, they are made of bronce and tin and weigh 1,600 kilograms (3,527 lb). All by me, Poco² 20:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 20:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very good ! And thanks for very interesting explanations.--Jebulon (talk) 20:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

  You are welcome, that's something I have done in the past, and will always do, as IMHO it enriches the nomination and allows of all us, beginning with me, to learn something about the subjects displayed here. Poco² 20:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

  I agree ! It is not always possible, and sometimes, I'm afraid it is boring for our fellows here, but...--Jebulon (talk) 23:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Ivar (talk) 06:11, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support a bit oversaturated maybe --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

* Oppose I put you notes of problematic light halos. Crop is too tight, could get sideways but why on top ? Colors are oversaturated and its a bit overexposed. I don't see any benefit of night HDR, maybe alternative from single shot. I suppose HDR explains that strange light behaviour on Skopje arc, this type of HDR is too artsy. --Mile (talk) 07:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC) Much better, I could even support. You have still some halos on side turrets. Smudge them. --Mile (talk) 20:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose plastic looking --Verde78 (talk) 09:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support It's good enough, really. --Tremonist (talk) 13:38, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I'm not bothered by the lighting or the crop, but the distortion on the flanking towers is too noticeable. Daniel Case (talk) 16:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
•  New version: top crop is more generous now, halos are reduced (Mile) and I have made slight adjustments in the the saturation and curves (Verde78) Poco² 19:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

   New version: One more of further removal or halos (Mile) --Poco² 22:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Laitche (talk) 02:59, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support big wow for me - Benh (talk) 09:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I guess you can't do much about the towers distortion. The timing and the composition are good, the exposure is perfect, and the colors are great. --Yann (talk) 10:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 00:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support — Julian H.^✈ 09:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good work --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect illumination! -- Pofka (talk) 19:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good and nice work. Congratulations--Lmbuga (talk) 20:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 21:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 16:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Now you manage to spoil it. --Mile (talk) 07:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

  Hi Mile, you have managed to really confuse me about your expectations with regards to this picture. Would you please elaborate why you are rejecting now? On Nov. 11th you opposed (halos, top crop, saturation, overexposure) to this candidate. Following that I uploaded 2 versions with which I tried to address all those issues. Your reaction was then to strike through your oppose vote here. One day later, without any comment here or in my talk page you uploaded a new version of this file based on an older version i.e. the improvements that I had introduced following your oppose vote were gone. I left a comment in your talk page that same day about this problem, I kindly asked you to let me know how can I improve the latest version from the RAW file (since after comparing versions it wasn’t really clear to me what you change). As also mentioned in my message in your talk page, I do (as many others here) appreciate if I am asked before my versions are reworked as I believe that I have the best premises (RAW file) to introduce sustainable improvements in the file. In my message I also announced that I'd revert it as to me the updated picture was not a clear improvement, and I did so one day later. You didn’t answer my message so far and just react now opposing again with a comment that puzzles me. Please, could you point out what is the problem of the current version? Poco² 09:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

• I suppose I did edit from your last edition. Now check posterization on left turret on mine and on this version. Don't you see you put posterization back ? Definitely I shouldn't waste my time with edits anymore. --Mile (talk) 12:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

  Mile: I haven't seen any posterization that would IMHO motivate an oppose and I didn't come to the conclusion either that that issue would be specially noticeable around the left turret. I have uploaded though a new version with a slight rework of the whole sky. Maybe you like this version.

  Regarding your comment, I think that a bit more of communication would have helped, a message here, a note there, I just missed that. I have also created alternative versions in FPC of pictures of yours that you didn't want to consider. That was no big deal. Poco² 18:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture