Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aufgang-Baumwipfelpfad-Bad-Harzburg-2015.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Aufgang-Baumwipfelpfad-Bad-Harzburg-2015.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2015 at 22:32:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
- Info Circular rise to the Canopy walkway in Bad Harzburg
all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 22:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC) - Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 22:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition LivioAndronico (talk) 22:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Hypnotic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:23, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 02:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support — regards, Revi 04:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:43, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support, nice. A bit dark, but nice. — Julian H.✈ 10:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 11:53, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:42, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
NeutralDefeated by supporting pressure support Nice composition but clouds are too distracting for me. --Laitche (talk) 15:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC) --Laitche (talk) 07:55, 25 December 2015 (UTC)- Comment He, Laitche,I have no problem with your neutral vote, no reason to change due to "supporting pressure" :) For me the clouds are a nice contrast of forms to the geometric structure of the circular walkway. But photos are ofter a matter of taste. You had prefered a complete blue sky here? --Tuxyso (talk) 09:13, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, I prefer a complete blue sky in this case. I think whole sky blue background is nicer element for this composition but with clouds still deserve FP, so I have changed my vote. Although if I were you, would wait for complete blue sky for FP nomination :) --Laitche (talk) 11:43, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment He, Laitche,I have no problem with your neutral vote, no reason to change due to "supporting pressure" :) For me the clouds are a nice contrast of forms to the geometric structure of the circular walkway. But photos are ofter a matter of taste. You had prefered a complete blue sky here? --Tuxyso (talk) 09:13, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support Interesting interplay of shapes and forms. Daniel Case (talk) 22:14, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support Merry X-mas! --Hubertl 00:04, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks, Hubertl. BTW: Question Has anyone recognized the hanging Christmas Trees inside the photo? --Tuxyso (talk) 09:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Sure, I have! I was just wondering, why nobody of the guys there have tried to cover the ugly cutting somehow. --Hubertl 09:22, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks, Hubertl. BTW: Question Has anyone recognized the hanging Christmas Trees inside the photo? --Tuxyso (talk) 09:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:37, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support Pile on... --Yann (talk) 14:03, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support The image can be stored in Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges as Canopy walkway in Wikipedia are categorized in the bridges. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges