Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alaska Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes).jpg

File:Alaska Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2015 at 12:38:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Alaska Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alaska Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
•  Info created by Gregory "Slobirdr" Smith - uploaded and nominated by The Photographer -- The Photographer (talk) 12:38, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- The Photographer (talk) 12:38, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support In this photo camouflage is perfect!--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:17, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Vibrant eyes! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:42, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Vibrant eyes, lovely fur! --Hafspajen (talk) 14:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:25, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 17:59, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:47, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose The crop is too tight --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:05, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment On many grounds... Many better pictures of Vulpes vulpes on Commons. Sub-species not mentioned. I agree, cropping poor. Not very sharp and over-exposed. Sorry. Charles (talk) 08:17, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Well, its just filename, you can see Vulpes vulpes fulvus how a file category. What do you mean about over-exposed, could you add notes?. Could you show me what is a "Many better pictures of Vulpes vulpe" fulvus for you? and sharp is relative because its a hight size picture of a wild animal --The Photographer (talk) 09:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

My comments of better images referred to Vulpes vulpes, not sub species. Withdrawn my oppose. Charles (talk) 23:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Support. Very nice. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:09, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like the face and the color contrast but ... I still think it could be better with a crop on the left to square things off. However, there seems to be a bit of color noise that also remains. I am not sure that the greenish areas I see in full-res are actually there. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 16:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lots of unnecessary colour noise. Bottom/top crop relation is not ideal imo. — Julian H.^✈ 16:18, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Julian. --Laitche (talk) 21:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too tight crop. Lower part of the animal is not visible. -- Pofka (talk) 14:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Kszapsza (talk) 21:43, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:23, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals