Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20160729 - Taungthaman Lake near Amarapura in Myanmar - 6044.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:20160729 - Taungthaman Lake near Amarapura in Myanmar - 6044.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2016 at 22:35:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Jakubhal - uploaded by Jakubhal - nominated by Lmbuga -- Lmbuga (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Lmbuga (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 03:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- cart-Talk 11:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --XRay talk 12:11, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose The framing is fine but a 16:9 crop (taking top and bottom off but keeping the sides) is much much stronger. However the light is really dull, and the third boat is obscured, so this is a scene with potential for another time. The foreground is of tourists rather than locals and distant bank isn't interesting. -- Colin (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)- Oppose If it were just the compositional shortcomings noted by Colin I would probably forgive then; I still like this although he's right about how it could be better. However ... the whole image seems like it was overprocessed. The people on the boats look a little waxy, the far shore is less sharp than perhaps it could be, but most importantly the clouds have posterized areas with some areas of off color. Daniel Case (talk) 16:08, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Halavar (talk) 15:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Neutral - I'm sorry, but looking at this photo again, I see enough of the things Daniel and Colin mention to change my vote. I still like this photo at full-page size, so I'm not sure about actually opposing, but drawbacks at full size are a good reason not to feature an otherwise good photo, and what my neutrality does is give the tie break to an additional voter. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
