Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015.07.07.-18-Mulde Eilenburg--Bruch-Weide.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2015.07.07.-18-Mulde Eilenburg--Bruch-Weide.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2015 at 14:26:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Salicaceae
- Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 14:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Hockei (talk) 14:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 19:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose An impressive tree, the subject has potential! However, this picture doesn't really convince me: There's hard mid-day light with the leaves appearing almost white on top and almost black in the shadows with little actual green in-between (Yes, I know that the leaves of this species have a less lively green than many others, but still …). Though taken at the same time, for some reason this one works better for me. I think choosing a different time for the shooting (e.g. warm, soft morning or evening light or maybe even some mystic foggy day) might have given this subject the last punch towards a "WOW!" image. Sorry, --El Grafo (talk) 11:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per El Grafo, sorry. It's really the worst time of day for such a photo unfortunately. — Julian H.✈ 11:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral per others. --Tremonist (talk) 12:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per opposers. But beautiful specimen. It could be great with a sunset(rise) light. - Benh (talk) 22:17, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Info Even if perhaps it doesn't make sense I've uploaded a new version with better colour. --Hockei (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- It always makes sense to improve images, that's the purpose of this project (to me, this looks like a little more saturation than necessary, but still...). — Julian H.✈ 16:53, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Of course I mean no sense for FP. The saturation I left untouched. --Hockei (talk) 08:25, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:59, 20 September 2015 (UTC)