Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013.08.30.-4-Kaefertaler Wald Mannheim-Wolfsmilchschwaermerraupe.jpg

File:2013.08.30.-4-Kaefertaler Wald Mannheim-Wolfsmilchschwaermerraupe.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2015 at 18:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2013.08.30.-4-Kaefertaler Wald Mannheim-Wolfsmilchschwaermerraupe.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013.08.30.-4-Kaefertaler Wald Mannheim-Wolfsmilchschwaermerraupe.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Sphingidae_.28Hawk_moths.29
•  Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Hockei (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support The background is perhaps a little bit cluttered, but with detail and color like this on the caterpillar it's not the first or second thing you notice. If you do. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Kikos (talk) 06:37, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:05, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Hockei Nice job, very sharp, and crispy photo... however, see the notes, with a better you could remove the distraction in front plan, and clone stamp the dust, and it's a bit dark, have a lack of white and blacks also. Next time, give more room in front the animal, it will bring a better composition. -- RTA 10:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

RTA, I have read your comment now again. Regarding more room in front I think you haven't understand the picture. The camera was almost lying on the ground. The recording is near horizontal. Therfore more room makes no sense. And I've no idea what you mean with lack of white and blacks. --Hockei (talk) 15:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Makes no sense? Or you was not able to soak the information?? Any photo editor, Lightroom, Capture One ... have a bar to control the quantity of blacks and whites of our photo... and you are able to see the volume of blacks and whites with the histogram. And stills dark, specially in the head -- RTA 11:42, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support but I agree to RTA that it is a bit dark, and that there could be more space in front --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Fenerli1978 (talk) 12:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:17, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Info New version. A bit brightend, a little bit more space in front and two spots removed. --Hockei (talk) 13:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Beautiful subject, but the surroundings are just atrocious.--Fotoriety (talk) 22:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 05:16, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 12:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--Jebulon (talk) 22:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:42, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 01:58, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera