Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-07-30-Rohloff-Speedhub-FocusStacking-RalfR-N3S 0102 3 4 5.jpg

File:15-07-30-Rohloff-Speedhub-FocusStacking-RalfR-N3S 0102 3 4 5.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2015 at 20:02:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:15-07-30-Rohloff-Speedhub-FocusStacking-RalfR-N3S 0102 3 4 5.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-07-30-Rohloff-Speedhub-FocusStacking-RalfR-N3S 0102 3 4 5.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects

Parts of a bicycle hub Rohloff Speedhub 500/14; example for https://de.wikiversity.org/wiki/Focus_stacking

•  Info all by Ralf Roleček
•  Support -- Ralf Roleček 20:02, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 20:57, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:24, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Dэя-Бøяg 23:22, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:16, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Superb. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support WOW!!! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:01, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:09, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer 09:53, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 12:38, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Gearhead pr0n! I can practically smell the oil ... Daniel Case (talk) 16:16, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I know it's not such a big deal here because this is more artistic than illustrative, but wouldn't this work better with less oversharpening? — Julian H.^✈ 18:01, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

  Hmmm, das Bild ist wirklich für Wikiversity entstanden, es geht um maximale Schärfe. Für ein Dokumentarfoto vielleicht zu viel aber hier halte ich es für angemessen? --Ralf Roleček 18:37, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

•  weak oppose This composition does't work for me, D kuba (talk) 18:58, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I agree with Julian therefore I restacked and create the less oversharpening version and nominated the alternative. --Laitche (talk) 00:42, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:22, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose The alternative below is better. Yann (talk) 15:26, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info Restacked and less oversharpened. --Laitche (talk) 00:42, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Abstain as editor. --Laitche (talk) 00:42, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Better the other--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 06:41, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I prefer this but I won't oppose the original. — Julian H.^✈ 07:46, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support also fine with me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:22, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

  Thank you @Laitche and right, a very good version. --Ralf Roleček 11:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Support. I prefer this version too, the other version was too sharpened. Diliff (talk) 14:05, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support This version is better. Yann (talk) 15:24, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I still like the original more, but all the featurable elements are present here as well. Daniel Case (talk) 15:56, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Also great. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:04, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:36, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 20:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Σπάρτακος (talk) 12:57, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 09:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

The chosen alternative is: File:15-07-30-Rohloff-Speedhub-FocusStacking-RalfR-N3S 0102 3 4 5.jpg