Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Македониум - Крушево.jpg

File:Македониум - Крушево.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2013 at 00:35:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Македониум - Крушево.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Македониум - Крушево.jpg

•  Info created by Petkovskiot - uploaded by Petkovskiot - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:35, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:35, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support ArionEstar (talk) 15:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC) Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits. JKadavoor Jee 16:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support--R ašo 18:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Made me stop mid-scroll and go "What's that?" Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support With Daniel. I would prefer a fully symmetrical crop (wider at the left, or tighter at the right). --Tuxyso (talk) 12:47, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support...and find it. Wonderful! Jee 17:03, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Finally, an interesting architecture even though the light is nothing special to talk about. Also there seems to be some amount of vignetting. Please fix. --Dey.sandip (talk) 07:17, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 08:24, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Weak "yes".--Никола ^{Стоіаноски} 14:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Suspicious voting here and this candidate. Suspect canvassing. -- Colin (talk) 14:33, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Or ignorance; a fair warning may enough. Jee 14:46, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Warning for what? Expressing my opinion for both images? What makes you think that it is suspicious? Did I comment about the comments of the others? No. --Никола ^{Стоіаноски} 18:48, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

And just to inform you, because you haven't seen everything, and yet you claim something that's not true. This picture and the other one are part of the public call (project) Wiki loves cultural heritage. These images cannot escape my eye since I am part of the commission (six members) that decides the final results. Therefore, I have seen and I know these images even before they were nominated. Best--Никола ^{Стоіаноски} 18:58, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Никола, I used the word "ignorance"; "inexperiance" may be more suitable. From the page history, you can see how careful we are treating every nominations, to update description, adding categories, finding possible usage... I appreciate your nominations here; but adding so many supports from the same community is not very useful for a fair review. Better you can make a nomination and wait to see what regular reviewers say. (Just my personal opinion, no community guideline for it; so take it or not.) Jee 02:55, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Ah, OK, I see. Regs...--Никола ^{Стоіаноски} 10:27, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Nice. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 11:50, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support a postcard from the 1970s --ArildV (talk) 14:20, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 19:38, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 03:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture