Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ЕкспедицијаЛакавичко 190.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:ЕкспедицијаЛакавичко 190.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2016 at 20:12:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Shot on overcast weather, however it wasn't completely gray which gives the texture in the clouds behind and somehow amps up the saturation in the colors. Sadly I couldn't move the gate to form a perfectly symmetrical look, but I think it isn't such a big problem here. It is one image, shot handheld. The soft light kind of hurt the details, but it isn't that bad, at least better than I anticipated it to be. Created by Petrovskyz - uploaded by Petrovskyz - nominated by Ehrlich91 -- Ehrlich91 (talk) 20:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Ehrlich91 (talk) 20:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)- Support The gate doesn't bother me. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Please don´t mix up Creator/Uploader and Nominator! --Hubertl 20:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Comment Interesting view and nice composition, but the detail is not there at all. Camera and lens seem good, so it looks like the building was out of focus and then oversharpened. --DXR (talk) 08:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Oppose per DXR. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)- Oppose air hallos --Mile (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per DXR --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. Beautiful light and composition but insufficient technical quality. Try again using a tripod and manual focusing. --Kreuzschnabel 14:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Would that it were sharper, per everyone else ... Daniel Case (talk) 17:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Daniel. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 13:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
