Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Внатрешноста во црквата во Гари 1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Внатрешноста во црквата во Гари 1.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2016 at 18:32:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
- Info created by Petrovskyz - uploaded by Petrovskyz - nominated by Ehrlich91 -- Ehrlich91 (talk) 18:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Ehrlich91 (talk) 18:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - Beautiful scene but way too unsharp at full size for FP, in my opinion. Try a Valued Image nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:16, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Btw, Valued Image are not the ugly images of FPC. :D --The Photographer (talk) 23:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- I know what Valued Images are. They can have various technical and compositional problems, as long as they are the best representation of a particular category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- I don`t have so much knowledge in photography. For me, this image was spectacular, but thanks for your comments and advises. --Ehrlich91 (talk) 21:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- You're welcome. If you stick around on Featured Picture Candidates, you'll probably learn a lot about photography. I know I have. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- I don`t have so much knowledge in photography. For me, this image was spectacular, but thanks for your comments and advises. --Ehrlich91 (talk) 21:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- I know what Valued Images are. They can have various technical and compositional problems, as long as they are the best representation of a particular category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Btw, Valued Image are not the ugly images of FPC. :D --The Photographer (talk) 23:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ikan. INeverCry 19:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Neutral, as I'm having trouble getting to see it a full-resolution even with the large image viewer.Oppose OK, now that I have managed to do so I agree with Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 17:49, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)