Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ëures Resciesa Mont de dora Crist Gherdëina.jpg

File:Ëures Resciesa Mont de dora Crist Gherdëina.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2019 at 17:24:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ëures Resciesa Mont de dora Crist Gherdëina.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ëures Resciesa Mont de dora Crist Gherdëina.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
•  Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Another beautiful one, and with the immense resolution typical of your work. Cmao20 (talk) 21:28, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Seven Pandas (talk) 22:04, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Boothsift 00:05, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Cmao20. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 03:50, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Technically it's great, the weather is nice and the nature is wonderful. But I'm missing a clear subject or compositional idea. --El Grafo (talk) 08:14, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

   Comment The subject are the porphyr cliffs as written in the description --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:38, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose per El Grafo and I find the mid-day light too boring. Also the focus was set too far the far mountains are rendered much sharper than the slightly blurry foreground with the tourists. – Lucas^T 08:57, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment What you say, pardon me, does not make sense. How can the tourists, several hundred meters away, be out of focus and the background be in focus with an aperture of f/11? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes, right, this shouldn't be the cause but still there is a clear difference in sharpness. My oppose doesn't hinge on that, the other points are more important to me. – Lucas^T 18:36, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't think Lucas is imagining this, I can see it too. I think you have a heat haze area hanging over the nearer sunlit rocks on the left. It will do very strange things with your photos. Take a look at how distorted/blurry the houses on the right side in this photo are, while this photo taken from the same point of a location over four times as far away, but over the cooler sea, is not very affected. That day, the photos taken towards the sea were acceptable but I had to throw away all the photos taken inland of the town. I had gone there to make a panorama of the old town in Lysekil (to the right of the houses in the first photo and further inland), but they turned out beyond bad. --Cart (talk) 16:36, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

• @W.carter: I'm afraid the comment applies to an other candidate --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:32, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

• Well, no, I was commenting on this photo (providing link for clarity). Perhaps you somehow misunderstood what I wrote. Lucas mentioned a "slightly blurry foreground with the tourists" and I provided a possible explanation for it using my own photos/experience as examples. Nature can play tricks on us even if we have extraordinary cameras. Anyway, I will not be offended by you striking my comment since it is your nomination. --Cart (talk) 17:47, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:59, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I lacks wow, sorry Poco² 17:10, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Eatcha (talk) 13:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:48, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy