공용:사무관
Shortcuts: COM:BCRAT • COM:BURO • COM:CRAT • COM:RFB
| Bureaucrats as of 5월 2024 [+/−] |
|
Number of bureaucrats: 6
|
이 문서는 위키미디어 공용에서의 사무관의 역할에 대해 설명합니다. 역할의 세부 사항과 사무관의 선출 방식은 다른 위키와는 다를 수 있습니다.
사무관의 도움을 필요로 한다면, 사무관 알림판에 해당 내용을 써 주세요.
사무관이 뭐죠?
기술
사무관은 위키미디어 공용의 관리자이면서 다음의 기술적 권한을 가진 사용자입니다:
이것들은 사무관 도구로 알려져 있습니다.
공동체 역할
사무관은 경험이 많고 신뢰받는 관리자로서 사무관 권한을 사용하는 데 동의하며 공동체의 투표와 총의에 의해 신뢰받는 사용자입니다.
각각의 사무관은 각각의 영역에 관심과 경험이 있습니다만, 일반적으로 사무관은 다음의 업무를 처리합니다:
- 관리자, 사무관, 검사관, 기록보호자 권한 요청
- 위키미디어 공용에서 봇을 가동하는 데 대한 허가 요청 (필요시 봇 권한 부여)
- 사용자 이름 변경 요청
- 위의 역할에 관련된 토론, 투표의 종결
Bureaucrats are expected to be capable of leading where necessary and of guiding (but not imposing their will on) policy discussions and other major community issues. They also have to be able to deal sensitively with confidential information (occasionally disclosed to the bureaucrats as a group), and to be able to judge what is and is not appropriate to discuss publicly on wiki.
Apart from roles which require use of the bureaucrat tools, bureaucrats have no special editorial authority by virtue of their position, and in discussions and public votes their contributions are treated in the same way as any ordinary editor. Any influence they may have is derived from their standing in the community. It is not that they gain special status by virtue of being a bureaucrat; rather, it is because bureaucrats are chosen from a pool of highly respected users, and highly respected users typically have some influence in the community anyway.
A bureaucrat closing a discussion or vote will do so on the basis of policy and if appropriate on the basis of consensus. Bureaucrats are trusted with a measure of discretion in all cases, and discussions/votes are never closed simply on the basis of a vote count. Bureaucrats may give more weight to well-argued opinions than unargued votes, and they may discount or partly discount votes and opinions of users who have made only a few contributions to Commons. Bureaucrats also have discretion to extend the period of a discussion or vote where they feel that would lead to a clearer consensus or otherwise improve the outcome.
It is allowed for a bureaucrat to close a discussion or vote on which they have previously expressed an opinion, but in such a case the closing bureaucrat should take care to close based on policy and overall consensus, and not on their own views. The bureaucrat's opinion/vote should be taken into account in the same way as that of the other voters, but with no special weight given to it. If the issue is particularly contentious, or the bureaucrat has become closely identified with one side of the argument, they may wish to ask another bureaucrat do the closing.
|
Show timeline of all users who have served as bureaucrats on Commons. |
|---|
 |
Mailing list
The Bureaucrat mailing list (bureaucrats-commons) is intended as a convenient way to notify some bureaucrats about urgent matters, and on rare occasions to discuss private matters. To contact the mailing list, please e-mail bureaucrats-commons@lists.wikimedia.org. If you wish to notify the list of an urgent matter, please include a link to any relevant on-wiki discussion. If you have a private request, please explain why it must remain private. If you prefer to contact an individual bureaucrat directly, you do not have to use the mailing list.
How do I become a bureaucrat?
First, read Commons:Bureaucrats/Howto.
When you are ready, make your request using the box below, replacing Username with your own user name.
For greater visibility, all requests made here are transcluded onto the central Commons:Requests and votes page.
Voting
Please note any registered user may vote here although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted. It is preferable if you give reasons both for 
Support votes or 
Oppose ones as this will help the closing bureaucrat in their decision. Greater weight is given to argument, with supporting evidence if needed, than to a simple vote.
Neutral comments are not counted in the vote totals for the purposes of calculating pass/fail percentages. However such comments are part of the discussion, may persuade others, and contribute to the closing bureaucrat's understanding of community consensus.
Purge the cache Use the edit link below to edit the transcluded page.
Requests for bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.