Category talk:Uncircumcised human penis

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

It has been proposed to move Category:Uncircumcised human penis to Category:Intact human penis[edit]

Reason: NPOV: "Un-circumcised" implies that circumcised is the norm and that intact penises have not been or should be circumcised. Common POV in the american culture.
Date: tagged 2011-01-24.

I think "intact human Penis" is a better name --Polarstern 22:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Agree too, intact is the proper term.--178.169.95.250 17:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sound argument. I agree.--MedicalReference
Intact is far better. I'm an intact American and I feel that the term "uncircumcised" is incredibly stigmatizing. 209.59.63.160


Hmm, several IP editors with no other edits show up here to "agree" that the name of the category should be changed. What do you think the odds are that this happened randomly? None, I would think. If there is to be a discussion about this, then it should happen amongst established editors, not Single Purpose Accounts drawn here solely to promote an agenda. Jayjg (talk) 02:42, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, a jew with no other edit than jewish photos show up here to defend his tradition of sexual mutilations of boys, pretend there is no consensus and singlehandedly revert everything to his pov. You are the one with an agenda, promoting the rape of boy by disgusting mutilation practices, and the odds were pretty high on that one.--Repoazre (talk) 10:10, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Intact Human Penis" or just "Human Penis" is NPOV. To call the natural penis "uncircumcised" is biased, just as is, say, calling a woman's natural breasts unmastectomized. Dan Bollinger (talk) 01:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page move mistake[edit]

Hello.

I originally planned on swapping the pages Category:Uncircumcised_human_penis with Category:Intact_human_penis. Directly moving that page there failed, so the next solution that came up to my mind was:

Let's move:

But after the first move, “Action Throttling” prevented any further moves. I did not expect that.

I should have edited the pages normally instead. Please undo that move. I didn't pay attention for these few seconds. Because I was used to the same behavioural habit with renaming files on a computer. ––Chanc20190325 (talk) 23:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]