User talk:Wilfredor/Archive 9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:14042012-Ma fille au café maure (7092804325).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:14082012-DSC 0968 (7892579366).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:17062012-DSC 0972 (7388630776).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:17062012-Inès underwater (7387662456).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:20042012-Qui m'a appelé "Princesse" ? (6951104234).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:20042012-Raaaaah !!! (6951482064).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:20042013 - Kech (874) (8673761647).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:20042013 - Y a quelqu'un ? (8673754051).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Bronze Buddha (3298568110).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Catwalk501 (5023595873).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Cosplay (5951705299).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:01, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:EARTHWING SKATEBOARD (7241833292).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Feather Girl Fashion (3786776714).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Happy Christmas (3103675697).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Happy Christmas 2008 (3106170165).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Happy Christmas 2008 (3107000422).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Happy Christmas Series (3111063477).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Happy Christmas Series (3111902064).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:-001 Stormtrooper with a camera - Chilli (14878076397).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:-002 Stormtrooper with a camera - Photoshoot (14894008788).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:-003 Stormtrooper with a camera - Nature photographer (14907712197).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:01062013 - pupuce ! (8917335445).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:03062012-DSC 0022 (7339134080).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Beach Boy... (4564033728).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Jake The Elements (2827355211).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:20, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Floridita London (3110966349).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yann (talk) 14:54, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:GirlHAPPY402 (3109387243).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Rainbow-Unicorn-Children-Love-Explosion-Big-Gingham (3183872667).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:PinkSKULL (3049389399).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 15:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:SKULLMICKEY (3048262220).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 15:09, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Super-Jungle Girl 6000 (3186660143).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 15:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:StudioNEWS (3026016784).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 15:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:My first roll if 120mm film. (6157143758).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MMFE (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:AnotherTime (2810851410).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MMFE (talk) 16:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Speed (9250306628).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MMFE (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Copenhagen (14297317965).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pugilist (talk) 21:19, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Den lille havsfrue (16020662338).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pugilist (talk) 21:19, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Commons Photographers User Group meeting on Saturday

Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,

I'd like to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, December 12. We'll have two presentations: Habib Mhenni aka Dyolf77 will answer the question Do "we" need DSLRs anymore? and Martin Falbisoner will walk us through the making of his featured picture File:Caribbean_Sea_-_Long_Exposure.jpg.

If you can make it, please add your name to the list of attendees to this page:

I hope to see you in three days. Also, I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2021. Your contributions to Commons make a big difference.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Oooh. You did rather well this year! Three in Brazil and four in Canada. Big congratulations! -- Colin (talk) 21:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Typical Breakfast in Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:09, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trabajadora de chicharronera en Boquerón.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:07, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Danbo vs Pepsi Man (8589896746).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Danbo Pepsi Version - New Gear Acquired! (9045079527).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

  * Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Wilfredor! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:39, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mask Diabo of Portugal used on folk fest and rituals.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mask Diabo of Portugal used on folk fest and rituals.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:FarkFK Anime Girl (4531887564).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Imperial Hall, Residenz Munich, Germany.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Imperial Hall, Residenz Munich, Germany.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Antiquarium, Münchner Residenz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Antiquarium, Münchner Residenz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Monte do Carmo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 23:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portrait of a Carpathian Lynx.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 23:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 23:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit stained-glass window (Cathedra Petri).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 23:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imperial Hall, Residenz Munich, Germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 23:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Basílica de San Pedro, Ciudad del Vaticano low light.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basílica de San Pedro, Ciudad del Vaticano low light.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on April 13, 2024

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 9.00 UTC ( start time in your timezone (via zoneStamp!) (expected duration for 2 hrs). The primary agenda of this gathering will revolve around discussions regarding the Movement Charter. Your valuable input and participation in these discussions would be highly appreciated. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on April 13, 2024.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you.

All the best, -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Banner at demonstrations and protests against Chavismo and Nicolas Maduro government 24.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Banner at demonstrations and protests against Chavismo and Nicolas Maduro government 35.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Solar eclipse on April 8, 2024 in Québec city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I have a flashback to 1999, when we had the eclipse in Germany. --Alexander-93 21:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Arc de Triomphe de l'Étoile at night vertical fix.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Arc de Triomphe de l'Étoile at night.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Île d'Orléans 048.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Île d'Orléans 048.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salle des Cariatides in Paris-Louvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Thank you for improving the retouching and the documentation! --Aristeas 14:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Visitors of Louvre and Nike of Samothrace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Please stop

Wilfredo,

It has come to my attention that you're making false and hurtful allegations about the current board members of the Commons Photographers User Group on Telegram. Let me clarify a few things:

  • When the last election of the user group came up, I decided not to run anymore. I needed more free time – for myself and for personal projects. Given that I had decided to be less active on Commons, I didn't feel like continuing my board membership was a good idea. I communicated this ahead of the election to my fellow board members, as documented in the board meeting notes from November 9, 2023 (which are publicly available on Commons).
  • There's no "phantom group of Indians and Africans" and there's also not been any "plot". Some of the current board members have served alongside me and I consider them my friends. I find both your allegation that the board election in December 2023 was a hostile takeover as well as your wording deeply disturbing.

Your behavior is unacceptable and not in line with the Wikimedia Foundation's Universal Code Of Conduct. Therefore, I ask you to set things straight on Telegram within 72 hours after receiving this message. If I were you, I'd also consider an apology to the people you've been throwing dirt at. If that clarification doesn't happen, I will use all means available to me to ensure that your toxic behavior won't be tolerated on Wikimedia projects anymore.

Sincerely, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Frank. Yes it was me and I'm stopping according to your recommendation, I feel that I am going through a difficult time and this is unbalancing many things and not only in the Wiki, I am looking for psychological help I hope things improve in the future. If you think it is necessary I think you can initiate administrative action regarding this, I don't think you think I want to excuse myself or escape from it, in fact I think it is the right thing to do. --Wilfredor (talk) 00:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Wilfredo, it makes me sad to hear that you're not well. However, given that you completely made up this plot story, I urge you to set the record straight on Telegram and admit that you were wrong. It's not my goal to take any administrative action against you – my goal is to protect my friends from wrongdoing and to make Commons a place where we treat each other respectfully. I hope things will get better in your life. Let me know if there's anything I can help with. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC) P.S. I just saw that you apologized. I very much appreciate that. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chess game Staunton No. 6 perfil view 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Repair tool kit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolsa feita de couro de vaca no nordeste do Brasil com Bíblia em português.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Montreal city 2022 12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Asclepias (talk) 12:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fruits set.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 07:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IBM Model M Spanish layout Keyboard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IBM Model M Spanish Keyboard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IBM AS400 Keyboard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IBM Model M Spanish Keyboard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tools 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good enough. --Nacaru 22:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I like your picture, and I'd like to nominate to FPC, but it needs a bit of cleaning. Would you like me to do it, or would you do it yourself? Best, Yann (talk) 16:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done If you see that it is dirtier, you are free to clean it more, you can edit any of my photos without asking my permission in the future. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 21:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Solar eclipse on April 8, 2024 in Québec city, pano no mirror version.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ZuppaDiCarlo 13:36, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Javascript

Hi, I hope you are doing well 🍀! Are you the creator of the QICvote gadget? If so congratulations, you must be very skilled with javascript! If you are available and would accept to help, these skills might be useful to the POTY committee. It seems that they are in trouble this year because the only member of their committee that understands javascript is missing since almost three months and we don't know if he'll ever come back. Do you think you might be able to help them? If so I think the community would be extremely grateful to you! Best regards and wishing you a beautiful day -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation Giles and I really appreciate that you take me into account. However, The previous person who was in charge of this was my ex, out of respect for her, for something purely moral I prefer to leave this space open Wilfredor (talk) 20:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Oh I didn't knew that and if I did I wouldn't have asked! Really sorry about it and no problem I totally understand! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Coder's Barnstar
Here is a barnstar for you for your awesome creation of the QICvote gadget, a very appreciated and used tool. Thank you for it! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 14:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Snowy Owl

Here is some video from that day, if you are curious...

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=185126705018621 Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification, now I understand what happened. Wilfredor (talk) 22:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

VI!

Hi, Almost all of your tables are admissible but you have to formalize the scopes... Welcome to VI.

Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gehrenspitze Tannheim Tyrol Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Tarjeton Electoral de Venezuela 2024.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AbchyZa22 (talk) 10:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Captions

Hi Wilfredor,

I notice that you have created a number of items as part of the "Paris Project", but the caption that you have given is not meaningful. Ideally, if I am including the image in a Wikipedia (or other) article that I am writing, I should be able to cut and paste the caption that you have given and use it in my article and it will make sense. I suggest that you change the captions to read something like "Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci - The Louvre, Paris". I have updated three image, but I do not plan to go through all of your images. Martinvl (talk) 14:23, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Dear Martin, please, could you link me the item and the images impliqué?, merci Wilfredor (talk) 14:27, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
{{ping|Wilfredor}, Hi - I was referring to the 199 images in Category:Images from Paris Project. Martinvl (talk) 16:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Dear @Martinvl: , I understand what you're saying, thank you for letting me know. I have been changing the descriptions of those images, but I completely forgot about the captions. Feel free to alter them if you think it's necessary. There are many images, not only in Paris, but also in Munich, Rome, Austria, etc. It's a slow job, but I have started doing it. Hugs. Wilfredor (talk) 17:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Lage, Rio de Janeiro Project 2345 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Need better description, more specific CAT. --Tagooty 02:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done --Wilfredor 00:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 07:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

File:MUSTAFA (6332174615).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dosseman (talk) 08:40, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

File:AMBULATORIO ANGEL VICENTE OCHOA SEGURO SOCIAL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Theklan (talk) 09:05, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nursing Madonna - Bartolomeo Vivarini - Louvre RF 2011-51.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna and child with St Peter and St. Sebastian, by Giovanni Bellini, Louvre (MI 231).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Virgin Adoring the Christ Child with St. John the Baptist and Two Angels - Francesco Botticini - Louvre RF 2082.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of a Man - Antonello da Messina, Louvre MI 693.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Intervention of the Sabine Women - David (Louvre INV 3691).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antonello da Messina - Portrait of a Man (Il Condottiere).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Intervention of the Sabine Women - David (Louvre INV 3691).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:17, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'Âme brisant les liens qui l'attachent à la terre 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Actas de votación

Hola Wilfredor. Te quería pedir que por favor subas los archivos de las actas con nombres más descriptivos, por ejemplo anteponiendo que se trata de actas de votación, y no solo con el nombre del local. Atte. Bedivere (talk) 17:32, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Has seguido subiendo actas después de dejarte este mensaje haciendo caso omiso a mi petición de subirlos con nombres más descriptivos. Si sigues haciéndolo, se tomarán acciones. Bedivere (talk) 19:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

{{VICpromoted|Christ at the Column by Antonello da Messina (Louvre RF 1992-10).jpg|Christ at the Column by Antonello da Messina (Louvre RF 1992-10)|review=*  Support by nom. --Thi (talk) 19:33, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ReneeWrites (talk) 22:42, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Andromaque et Pyrrhus by Pierre-Narcisse Guérin, (Louvre INV 5183).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blessing Christ, by Giovanni Bellini, Louvre RF 2039.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna and Child with Two Angels - Pietro Perugino - Louvre INV 719.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

{{VICpromoted|Ponziano Loverini, Santa Grata accoglie le spoglie di Sant'Alessandro, 1887.jpg|Santa Grata accoglie le spoglie di Sant'Alessandro, by Ponziano Loverini (Vatican Museums)|review=* Comment Must to the category or gallery that contains the image . Look at how other competitors build their scope. --Pierre André (talk) 09:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 14:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ReneeWrites (talk) 22:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna and Child with a Dove - Piero di Cosimo - Louvre INV 817 .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 August 2024 (UTC)