User talk:Vespertunes

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
User:Vespertunes/Headings/Vespertunes

User:Vespertunes/Menu 2

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Vespertunes!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:21, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

your recent uploads

[edit]

Hi Vespertunes, could you explain why you uploades scores of unfree photos from other photographers, such as the foreign photographer, Dietmar Temps, Astrid van Veen, Steve @ the alligator farm, shai levi and Henny Brouwers, claiming them as your own work? --Túrelio (talk) 14:53, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: All photos were uploaded together through Commons Android app, where there were no options for the other copyrights. After all, I wanted to edit the essence of all the photos in browser after uploading these files. I use smartphone to contribute on Wikimedia Commons. That's why I have to face some problems to upload photos using a browser. The files have to be edited only after uploading on the browser. --Vespertunes (talk)–Moajjem 23:16, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Vespertunes,
thanks for your reply. However, none of the images from other photographers, which you had uploaded, was under a free license. Most were "All rights resvered" and the rest was under CC-BY-NC, which is not allowed on Commons. So, none of these images would have been allowed on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 06:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Reply: I apologize for my guilt. Later on, when I'll use any photo of other photographers, I'll immediately try to credit them with appropriate link. Can I?-Vespertunes (talk)-Moajjem 07:37, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
When uploading images from other photographers, which have been published on Flickr, to Commons, on Commons:Upload >Upload form< you should use the "Flickr-path" (It is someone else's work from Flickr ). See also this guide. --Túrelio (talk) 16:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You need to have the creator (photographer) email COM:OTRS with the permission and license that they want it to be uploaded under. Also removing the permssion template when it isn't been address isn't the way to handle it. Bidgee (talk) 03:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]
As you've completely ignored the warning I gave you on removing the permission tag, I've recommended that you be reblocked. You cannot upload anyone's copyrighted work without permission from the creator/copyright holder and you shouldn't be claiming it as your own work (when clearly it isn't) since it is license laundering and is a copyright infringement (by claiming own work on someone else's copyrighted work). Bidgee (talk) 04:07, 21 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anne Bauval (talk • contribs) 11:06, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Introduction of Angle has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anne Bauval (talk) 11:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
File:Liver-Hued Butterfly on Asters 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liver-Hued Butterfly on Asters 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 21:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spider Web Covered with Flower.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spider Web Covered with Flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
File:Thankuni Herbs.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thankuni Herbs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support: Quality could be better, composition, too, but overall OK for me. --Basotxerri 05:55, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
File:Carissa carandas.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carissa carandas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 21:52, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
File:Wild Pink Tulip.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wild Pink Tulip.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:00, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not overwrite files

[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Mangosteen.jpeg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Vespertunes,

please do not overcategorize files. Let's take File:সুপারি ডালের গাড়ি.jpg as example:

When the file is in Category:Paba Upazila the categories

are not necessary, since the category "Paba Upazila" is already contained in them.

BTW: Thanks for your great photos. Cheers--Transatlantifa (talk) 08:47, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cricket Fans 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nahid Hossain (talk) 16:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cricket Fans 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nahid Hossain (talk) 16:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cricket Fan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nahid Hossain (talk) 16:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cricket Fans 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nahid Hossain (talk) 16:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spectators of Cricket.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nahid Hossain (talk) 16:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cricket Fans 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nahid Hossain (talk) 16:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cricket Fans.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nahid Hossain (talk) 16:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moajjem Hossain.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 10:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Kulmalukko (talk) 17:25, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Official Logo of Life Will Change (LWC).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 11:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Vespertunes_Artwork has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 16:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

High Quality Images by Vespertunes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 16:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vespertunes Photography has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 16:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Purple Flower in Rajshahi.jpg

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Purple Flower in Rajshahi.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creator:Vespertunes has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this creator, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen (keep talking) 05:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
File:Crystallisation of Sugarcane.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Crystallisation of Sugarcane.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crystallisation of Sugarcane.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weaver Bird.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Spizaetus (talk) 03:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Use your Image in a Youtube Video

[edit]

Hi I make educational videos about human geography on Youtube and would like to use your image called "taking selfie" from Wikimedia Commmons. It is a great image and helps me teach the idea of "digital natives" in a video about different age cohorts. You can check out the video when I release it later tonight-- here is the link to my channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNwu_HV7NyLEZgqvRxW3JBw

Let me know if you have any problem with my use of the photo in this way. Thanks so much for sharing it!

e-mail: humanplacemedia@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 73.27.251.72 (talk) 18:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:White Cloudy Sky.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 16:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

বাংলা বিবরণ যোগ করতে ভুলবেন না ভাই

[edit]

ভাই আপলোডের সময় বাংলা বিবরণ যোগ করতে ভুলবেন না। ইন্টারনেট দুনিয়ায় বাংলায় কোন কিছু নেই। বাংলা বিবরণ যোগ করলে, বাংলায় লিখে খুঁজলে সেই সব ছবি পাওয়া যাবে।

আপলোড উইজাডে আরেকটি ভাষায় একটি বিবরণ যোগ করুন ক্লিক করে বাংলা বিবরণ যোগ করতে পারেন। একসাথে একাধিক ছবি আপলোডের ক্ষেত্রে নিন্মলিখিত সমস্ত আপলোডে তথ্য অনুলিপি করুন... ক্লিক করে প্রথম বিবরণ তার নিচের সব ছবির জন্য অনুলিপি করতে পারেন। [1]

আপনার বাংলা লেখার কিবোর্ড না থাকলেও সমস্যা নেই, উইকিতে বাংলা লেখার কিবোর্ড আছে। bn:সাহায্য:বাংলা_টাইপ_করা একটু দেখুন। এটা অনুসরণ করে এখানে কমন্সেও বাংলা কিবোর্ড সক্রিয় করে নিতে পারবেন। --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Human Body Flash.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Birds Flying during Sunset 29.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oaktree b (talk) 01:46, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

Hi,

  1. Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Why did you say these are your own works when you uploaded the files? Who is the photographer?
  2. Please create proper deletion requests. Your requests are broken, that's why I reverted you. Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See also COM:ANU#Vespertunes. Yann (talk) 20:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jahid Nirob.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jahid Nirob.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yann (talk) 20:59, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Krd 07:39, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me about the deletion requests at Commons. Your input is crucial, and I urge you to participate in the discussion to retain all these valuable files listed here. Let's work together to maintain a rich and balanced Wikimedia Commons. Thanks again. Moajjem Hossain 00:18, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
আপনার উচিত এই পাতায় মন্তব্য করাআফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 00:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ধন্যবাদ, উক্ত পাতায় আমি মন্তব্য সংযোজন করেছি। Moajjem Hossain 02:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)