User talk:Usien
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
ich kann kaum glauben, daßer Alte Peter ein gothischer Neubau des 13. Jahrhunderts sein soll. Die Fotos überzeugen da nicht sehr. Joe
Babel user information | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Users by language |
Zirkus Krone
[edit]Hallo Usien, stecke Deine Bilder vom Zirkus Krone doch bitte in Category:Circus Krone (statt Category:Circus). Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 10:38, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Žmuidzinavičius Museum
[edit]Hallo Usien, ich habe inzwischen das ganze Museum mit Category:Devils versehen. Für jedes einzelne Bild ist das nun nicht mehr notwendig, es reicht jeweils Category:Žmuidzinavičius Museum. -- Ies (talk) 12:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
danke--Usien (talk) 12:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Галерија на богатствата на Хорјуџи.JPG was uncategorized on 14 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Bega noaptea in Timisoara Podul Tineretii.JPG was uncategorized on 2 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Muenchen alter sendlinger friedhof Schwanthaler.jpg was uncategorized on 21 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:25, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Feuerwehreinsatz in Puchheim an einer Autowerkstatt 005.JPG was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Ich habe das Bild nur bearbeitet, weil es technisch gesehen Fehler aufwies. Da ich nicht mal weiß was das Bild darstellt, und schon gar kein russisch lesen kann, kann ich es auch nicht in eine Kategorie einordnen. Du musst dich da an die Person wenden, die das Bild als erster hochgeladen hat. --Usien (talk) 12:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
hierfür. :) --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Elektrofahrzeug_der_Firma_Still.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stillgmbh (talk) 11:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Hallo!
Sag mal, warst du auf dem Oktoberfest? Nur dort kann man solche Aufnahmen machen. --High Contrast (talk) 11:59, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Stimmt, hier wird eben mal die andre Seite des Festes gezeigt. --Usien (talk) 14:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Hacker-Pschorr_Weihnachtsbier_Superior_Festbier.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Kulmbacher_Brauerei_Moenchshof_Weihnachsbier.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Weihnachtsbier_Festbier_Hofbraeu_Muenchen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Beer_bottles has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:28, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Removing DR template
[edit]Please do not remove {{Delete}} templates before the discussion is closed as you did at Beer bottles. It may be that the discussion will be closed as a keep, for German bottles, at least, but it is a serious violation of our rules to simply remove the template before an Admin has made that decision. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Was kann ich dafür, wenn ein Admin so falsch liegt. Vielleicht sollten Admins bessere Kenntnisse über das Urheberrecht haben. --Usien (talk) 21:17, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- [Machine translation:]What I can if an Admin so incorrectly lies. Perhaps Admins should have better knowledge of the copyright [machine translation ends].
- Certainly you cannot expect any of us, Admin or not, to fully understand the details of copyright law in the 100+ countries which Commons follows? These bottles would clearly be a copyvio in almost all of those countries. The DR discussion is intended to determine whether German law is sufficiently different to allow them to remain. Your opinion matters, but it is not the only one that matters. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:19, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- I stopped the beer bottle project. It makes little fun and too much trouble.--Usien (talk) 16:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- That's a mistake -- please don't -- if it turns out that German law permits it, then it's a great gallery for those of us who envy the great variety of German beers. We need a German speaking expert to take a close look at the law. That will happen, although maybe not quickly. Don't take a DR as being opposed to the image or gallery -- or as a personal thing -- as an Admin, I can be very interested in the image or gallery, but I must obey the law, or, as in this case, suggest that others look at it closely and see what the law is. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:38, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Think! This gallery is very special demands on the photographer. After the photos you have to be drink all the beer. ;-) --Usien (talk) 18:52, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Send it to me -- I can do it. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:59, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Think! This gallery is very special demands on the photographer. After the photos you have to be drink all the beer. ;-) --Usien (talk) 18:52, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- That's a mistake -- please don't -- if it turns out that German law permits it, then it's a great gallery for those of us who envy the great variety of German beers. We need a German speaking expert to take a close look at the law. That will happen, although maybe not quickly. Don't take a DR as being opposed to the image or gallery -- or as a personal thing -- as an Admin, I can be very interested in the image or gallery, but I must obey the law, or, as in this case, suggest that others look at it closely and see what the law is. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:38, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- I stopped the beer bottle project. It makes little fun and too much trouble.--Usien (talk) 16:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Certainly you cannot expect any of us, Admin or not, to fully understand the details of copyright law in the 100+ countries which Commons follows? These bottles would clearly be a copyvio in almost all of those countries. The DR discussion is intended to determine whether German law is sufficiently different to allow them to remain. Your opinion matters, but it is not the only one that matters. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:19, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:55, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hatte die Lizenz eingebunden, beim Hochladen gabs Probleme und dabei ging die Lizenz verloren, nun ist sie wieder drin. --Usien (talk) 17:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
too small version
[edit]Hello, thanks for improving File:Willem-Jan Holsboer in Heimatmuseum Davos.JPG. But you made it too small; a picture taken frontally (but with terrible reflections, therefore useless) has proportions Height-broadness 1:0,87. Can you broaden your version to that ratio? Thanks, --Havang(nl) (talk) 13:06, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- The image was previously unusable. Now it can be used in articles. I can not make more out of the picture. The basic version is not mine. --Usien (talk) 13:14, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Deine Nachbearbeitung hat die Bildproportionen komplett verzerrt. Betrachtet man das perspektivische Original, ist die Bildbreite grösser als dessen Höhe, mindestens aber quadratisch. Weshalb diese extreme Verzerrung? Der Porträtierte wirkt komplett unnatürlich. -- Хрюша ?? 13:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wie kan mann das fast quadratisch richtig form geben? --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:15, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Eine Idee liegt hier, aber ich kann das nicht entrauschen. Finale Runde für Usien ;0}. -- Хрюша ?? 14:31, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Danke, das ist die richtige Forme. --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:50, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Noch ein Hinweis für künftige Fotos: Wenn du zur Vermeidung von Spiegelungen Aufnahmen leicht seitlich machst, wähle den Ausschnitt gross genug, dann muss man beim Entzerren den Rahmen nicht beschneiden. Und als Referenz für die Proportionen trotz Reflexen noch eine Frontalsicht. -- Хрюша ?? 15:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Jawohl;heute achte ich darauf, aber 2006 war ich noch nicht actif auf Wikipedia.--Havang(nl) (talk) 17:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Noch ein Hinweis für künftige Fotos: Wenn du zur Vermeidung von Spiegelungen Aufnahmen leicht seitlich machst, wähle den Ausschnitt gross genug, dann muss man beim Entzerren den Rahmen nicht beschneiden. Und als Referenz für die Proportionen trotz Reflexen noch eine Frontalsicht. -- Хрюша ?? 15:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Danke, das ist die richtige Forme. --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:50, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Eine Idee liegt hier, aber ich kann das nicht entrauschen. Finale Runde für Usien ;0}. -- Хрюша ?? 14:31, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wie kan mann das fast quadratisch richtig form geben? --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:15, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Deine Nachbearbeitung hat die Bildproportionen komplett verzerrt. Betrachtet man das perspektivische Original, ist die Bildbreite grösser als dessen Höhe, mindestens aber quadratisch. Weshalb diese extreme Verzerrung? Der Porträtierte wirkt komplett unnatürlich. -- Хрюша ?? 13:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
File:Tractor Belarus Schneeraumer Riga Flughafen.JPG
[edit]Hi! Would it be alright if you added an English description to File:Tractor Belarus Schneeraumer Riga Flughafen.JPG? I want then put it on a Translation request to Latvian, since this is at Riga Airport.
English translation added.--Usien (talk) 11:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much :) WhisperToMe (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
File:Eiskarte_Italien.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Saibo (Δ) 22:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Sitzender Keiler Muenchen.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sitzender Keiler Muenchen.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 20:53, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
I make the picture. --Usien (talk) 21:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Litfaßsäule_Muenchen_Westendstrasse.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eingangskontrolle (talk) 16:30, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Fahndungsplakat_NSU.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.103.174 15:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Strip auf Peugeot two girls.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P. Sridhar Babu (talk) 11:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Tarahumara Mädchen.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tarahumara Mädchen.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Denniss (talk) 18:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Soweit ich das verstanden habe, habe ich das nötige Eingefügt. Das Bild kommt aus Wikipedia Deutschland und ich habe es für Wikinews benötigt. --Usien (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Rechtschreibfehler in Straßenkategorien
[edit]Hallo Usien, Straße schreibt man immer noch mit ß und nicht ss, also auch Bodenehrstraße, Kidlerstraße usw. Bitte korrigieren. Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 06:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Vielleicht findest du gelegentlich mal Zeit, auf diesen Hinweis zu antworten? Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 05:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ich gehe davon aus, dass der englische Zeichensatz hier verwendet wird und der kennt kein "ß"--Usien (talk) 20:13, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Nein, man darf in Kategorien ß verwenden, schau einfach mal bei anderen Straßenkategorien nach: Category:Streets in Munich by district. Das Problem ist, dass man, wenn man nach Hansastraße sucht, Hansastrasse nicht findet. Außerdem: Da es in Deutschland sicher ein Dutzend Hansastraßen gibt, nennst du die Kategorie besser Hansastraße in Munich. Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 14:07, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Strip auf Peugeot two girls.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Blue Fox xyz (talk) 10:26, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Bahnhof Pasing
[edit]Bedanke mich f. das Bild vom Bahnhof Pasing vom März 2012. Wie die den Vorplatz vollgepfercht haben, da hat's mich durchgeschüttelt. Liebe Grüße. OAlexander (talk) 11:08, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- Super, finde es schon auch mal einen Dank zu hören. Ging mir übrigens genauso. --Usien Max (talk) 21:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Polizeibeamter
[edit]Hallo, ist denn gesichert, dass das momentane Seitenbild von de:Spezialeinsatzkommando (File:SEK_Mann_auf_dem_Dach_des_Hotels_Bayrischer_Hof_in_Munich.JPG) einen SEK-Beamten zeigt? Nach Ausrüstung und Verwendung würde ich nicht ausschließen wollen, dass das einfach nur einen frierenden Bereitschaftspolizisten zeigt. --Rudolph Buch (Diskussion) 16:21, 14. Aug. 2012 (CEST)
- Frag mal User:Usien--Sanandros 18:33, 14. Aug. 2012 (CEST)
- Somit getan :-) --Rudolph Buch (talk) 19:54, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Bild ist von mir gemacht und ich versichere, dass es einer ist. --Usien Max (talk) 21:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Somit getan :-) --Rudolph Buch (talk) 19:54, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Jimi Blue Ochsenknecht 02 Oktoberfest 2012 mit Freundin.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Jimi Blue Ochsenknecht 02 Oktoberfest 2012 mit Freundin.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yann (talk) 12:00, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
File:Strip auf Peugeot two girls.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Baloo1000 (talk) 08:00, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
I am trying to understand exacty which competition is this one, looking at http://www.alpenverein.de/Wettkampf/Klettern-Bouldern-Speedklettern/Termine-Ergebnisse/ for giving the category the right name. DAV Calendar doesn't show a competition in Munich in 22.07.2012. Could you give me some more information? a web site for example?. Thanks in advance. --Rotpunkt (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- I found this one: http://www.alpenverein.de/wettkampf/muenchner-kletter-stadtmeisterschaft_aid_11281.html However it seems a local/regional competition, instead using the name "10th Climbing Championships in Munich" seems a national competition. I will try to find the correct name. I have also moved the two images in Category:9th Climbing Championships in Munich to Category:European Youth Series Munich 2009 because in this case the name was wrong at all. Cya. --Rotpunkt (talk) 15:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hi I have read more here (http://kletterszene.com/news/die-10-munchner-jubilaums-stadtmeisterschaft-findet-am-21-7-statt-ankundigung/). I don't speak german, however the translation for Stadtmeisterschaft could be "City championship" (is it right?). It's really a local competition, not listed on alpenverein.de calendar. Calling the categories "Climbing Championships in Munich" is a bit wrong for me, it seems a national/international competition. Could be something like: "Munich city championship - climbing". --Rotpunkt (talk) 00:31, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
[[1]] I dont know. Perhaps helps the link. I guess it's just an event in the amateurs can sign out among themselves who Climb best. --Usien Max (talk) 15:26, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- 10th Championships, the plural s is too much. What about Category:10th Munich Climbing Championship, 2012 ? --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
File:Bernd Burgemeister Fernsehpreis 2012 Jurymitglied Andreas Schreitmüller.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Andreperso (talk) 22:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Sommertollwood 201254 Idaho Michael Guppenberger an der Gitarre.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Michael.Guppenberger (talk) 06:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Bernd Bürgermeister Fehrnsehpreis Produzentin Siegerfilm Gefährliche Patienten sind Uli Putz.JPG
[edit]File:Bernd Bürgermeister Fehrnsehpreis Produzentin Siegerfilm Gefährliche Patienten sind Uli Putz.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
62.245.250.185 06:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Die Bildbeschreibung ist wohl beim Upload verlorengegangen, bitte hinzufügen. --Denniss (talk) 11:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Bitte schau mal ob es jetzt geht. --Denniss (talk) 16:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
What kind of attribution do you require for using this picture? I'm considering using it in a schoolbook, at about 4 cm x 3 cm size on the printed page.
- Hello, its no problem.
attribution
- Image: CC-BY-SA Usien
OK, thanks. Zbrntt (talk) 12:57, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 007 Westfriedhof Munich Grab Rosen auf einem Grab.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Granny in Albania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gabriele Weishaeupl Oktoberfest-Chefin und Michael Harles Fernsehmoderator.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Munich BMW Vierzylinder.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 030 Vesakh in Munich 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 007 Pferd beim Trinken an einem Kanal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hauskatze an einem Scheunenfenster in Grossarl.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File source is not properly indicated: File:Aufhofener Weiher.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aufhofener Weiher.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ww2censor (talk) 19:09, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Heiligenfigur in der Kapelle im Hafen von Malinska mit Fuck Finger.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Mar(c). 22:01, 15 July 2014 (UTC) 22:01
- F...- Humor is when you laugh anyway --Usien Max (talk) 16:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Christian Pfeiffer 002 2014 Juli.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hallo Usien, dieses Foto ist m.E. problematisch. Nach deutscher Rechtsprechung zum Recht am eigenen Bild liegt der Tatbestand "identifizierbar" bereits vor, wenn jemand, der die betreffende Person kennt, sie auf dem Bild identifizieren kann. Aufgrund des sichtbaren Schultertatoos dürfte das hier gegeben sein. Hinzu kommt, dass du die Person durch den gewählten Dateinamen als "betrunken" abgestempelt hast. Ich würde dir empfehlen, die Löschung zu beantragen, im Interesse der Frau und in deinem eigenen (Haftungsrisiko). --Túrelio (talk) 10:31, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:51, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
File:013 Kirche von Fushe Kuqe.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! HH Hafen Kontainerbruecken Sonnenuntergang 2015-03-23 19-55-39 - 0045.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Augustiner Edelstoff.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Krd 13:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
File:Vomiting Erbrechen drunk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wild lebender Hund in Bosnien.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Striptease auf einem Peugeot zwei Pornostars.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fixpol (talk) 13:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Nutzungserlaubnis Foto
[edit]Hallo Usien,
ich arbeite für das "Museum Mensch und Natur" in München und habe eine kurze Frage bezüglich eines deiner Bilder: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Botanischer_Garten_Muenchen_Gew%C3%A4chsh%C3%A4user.JPG
Das "Museum Mensch und Natur" ist Teil der Staatlichen Naturwissenschaftlichen Sammlungen Bayerns. Das Museum wird in den kommenden Jahren erweitert und wir arbeiten derzeit an einer Broschüre, die über den Umbau und das neue Konzept des Museums informieren soll. Die Broschüre wird nicht verkauft, sondern nur an mögliche Projektpartner und -unterstützer weitergegeben, sowie in PDF-Format auf der Website des Museums verfügbar sein.
Das oben erwähnte Foto wäre zur inhaltlichen Illustration des Projektes sehr gut geeignet und wir möchten hiermit gerne anfragen, ob wir das Bild in der Broschüre verwenden könnten. Natürlich würden wir die Quelle des Bildes mit einem entsprechenden Bildnachweis versehen.
Weitere Informationen zum Projekt finden Sie auf der Website www.namu-bayern.de. Ich würde mich sehr über eine Antwort an folgende Emailadresse freuen: braun@namu-bayern.de
Vielen Dank und beste Grüße, Verena Braun — Preceding unsigned comment added by Verena Braun (talk • contribs) 21:37, 03 July 2016 (UTC)
- Klar kann das Foto verwendet werden. --Usien Max (talk) 20:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Bettlerin an einer Kirche, Begging women Muenster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Coyote III (talk) 05:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- Nachtrag: "nach einer 'Spende' mit dem Foto einverstanden": die Frauen, die dort an der Kirche sitzen, befinden sich in einer Zwangssituation. Sie sind bettelarm (!) und werden möglicherweise auch gezwungen, dort um Geld zu bitten. Da halte ich 'einverstanden' für etwas abenteuerlich. An genau der Stelle, die du fotografiert hast, war eine Frau gegen eine größere Spende meinerseits zu ganz anderem noch bereit.
- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Coyote III (talk) 08:10, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- Dann sei stolz auf dich. Du hast gute Arbeit geleistet. Spende steht übrigens für Bezahlung. Danach habe ich nach deutschem Gesetz das Recht an diesem Bild. Persönlich habe noch die gleiche Meinung von dir, die ich bereits zum Ausdruck gebracht habe. Ich weiß auch nicht was du gegen eine größere Spende von einer anderen Frau am gleichen Ort verlangt hast. Ehrlich gesagt will ich es auch nicht wissen, damit musst du mit dir selbst klar kommen. --Usien Max (talk) 14:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Ich hab' nichts verlangt und bin auch nichts eingegangen, wenn es dich beruhigt; sie hat mir Sexuelles angeboten in ihrer Not. Viele Grüße, --Coyote III (talk) 05:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Dann sei stolz auf dich. Du hast gute Arbeit geleistet. Spende steht übrigens für Bezahlung. Danach habe ich nach deutschem Gesetz das Recht an diesem Bild. Persönlich habe noch die gleiche Meinung von dir, die ich bereits zum Ausdruck gebracht habe. Ich weiß auch nicht was du gegen eine größere Spende von einer anderen Frau am gleichen Ort verlangt hast. Ehrlich gesagt will ich es auch nicht wissen, damit musst du mit dir selbst klar kommen. --Usien Max (talk) 14:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Schade, dass das Foto für Wikipedia nicht mehr verfügbar ist. Ob die Person in einer Zwangslage ist oder nicht ist reine Spekulation. --Usien Max (talk) 14:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Augustiner Dunkel.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
. HombreDHojalata.talk 07:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Allgaeuer Brauhaus Hell.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
. HombreDHojalata.talk 09:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Usien,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Bildidentifikationsfrage
[edit]Hallo Usien, kannst du dich noch erinnern, wo du dieses Bild aufgenommen hast? Bitte um genauere Beschreibung am Bild. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:41, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- In einer Kriche in Bad Gastein in Österreich. Welche genau weiß ich nicht mehr. --Usien Max (talk) 19:44, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- Danke, insoferne bestätigst du die Vermutung der Rätselrater, de:Preimskirche. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:04, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
File:5th Isarinselfest 2014 007.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Red cats
[edit]Hi. It's good to open new cats, but please do not forget to complete the red ones you have opened within a period of five years, like in this case. Cheers. --E4024 (talk) 07:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
File:Hansastr Munich Plakat fur Buergerentscheid zur dritten Startbahn am Flughafen FJS.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
77.5.158.208 09:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Jesus am Kreuz Kirche St stephan Muenchen senlding.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 12:14, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
[edit]A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Fasching 027.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Menue Burger King.JPG
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Menue Burger King.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |