User talk:Tonyjeff/Archive01

Español: ¡Bienvenido a Commons, Tonyjeff/Archive01!

Primeros pasos Nuestras páginas de primeros pasos y preguntas frecuentes te ayudarán mucho tras registrarte. En ellas se explica cómo personalizar la interfaz (el idioma, por ejemplo), cómo subir archivos, y nuestra política básica de licencias. No necesitas habilidades técnicas para contribuir aquí. Sé valiente colaborando aquí y presume buena fe sobre las intenciones de otros. Commons es una wiki: es muy fácil. Obtener ayuda Más información está disponible en el portal de la comunidad. Puedes hacer preguntas en el Café o en el canal IRC #wikimedia-commons. También puedes ponerte en contacto con un administrador mediante su página de discusión.		Trucos, pistas y consejos Coloca carteles Babel en tu página de usuario para que otros usuarios sepan qué idiomas hablas, y también puedes indicar tus habilidades gráficas. Todas tus subidas son registradas en tu galería personal. Por favor, firma tus comentarios en páginas de discusión colocando ~~~~. Usa CommonSense para encontrar buenas categorías para los archivos que subas (¡así otros los pueden encontrar también!). Para enlazar a la página de descripción de una imagen, escríbelo así: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`. Si estás trasladando imágenes de otros proyectos, asegúrate de usar el CommonsHelper. ¿Cometiste un error? ¿Quieres renombrar o trasladar un archivo? Simplemente súbelo bajo otro nombre y marca el que quieres borrar así: `{{bad name\|Nombre correcto}}`. Para más información lee las normas de borrado.
(P.D. ¿Te gustaría comentar sobre este mensaje?)

Re: Parabéns

Ola, obrigado pelo elogio. Também dei uma olhada na sua galeria e realmente está muito legal. Dei uma olhada nos links que vc enviou e achei a idéia do projeto heraldico/vexilologico interessante. O que vc pretende? Trabalhar apenas com a heraldica de domínio ou também familiar e outras? Como vamos organizar o projeto. []s Srfortes 01:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Flag of FIAV.svg

Hi, I proposed to the deletation of the image above, since it is not in public domain, considering that it is the logotype of a private organization founded in the '60s. Thanks. --Tonyjeff 13:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tonyjeff,

Please look at the copyright page of the website. And you should insert the message to Zscout370 or Himasaram: they are the creator and the uploader. If you need any help on commons, don't hesitate to contact me. Thx.--Patricia.fidi 13:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Information template

Hi, Your last uploaded particulary in SVG are very fine. Just one thing about data in information template. You should copy/past in your user page the brief syntax. It's what I have done: it's easier for maintenance or upload. Good job on Commons!--Patricia.fidi 22:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{Information
|Description={{en|text}} {{fr|texte}}
|Source=own work
|Date=2006.xx.xx
|Author=[[user:Tonyjeff|Tonyjeff]]
|Permission=see below
|other_versions= -
}}
{{PD-self}}

will give this:

DescriptionTonyjeff/Archive01	English: text Français : texte
Date	2006.xx.xx
Source	own work
Author	Tonyjeff
Permission (Reusing this file)	see below
Other versions	-

I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide.
In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so:
I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

Portugal's Coat of Arms

I'd like to thank you for creating an SVG version of Portugal's coat of arms. It will be mightly useful for all projects that deal with Portuguese iconography.

I have noticed that you vectorized other Portuguese symbols. If I may ask, in case I'd provide you with an image of the ancient flag symbol used in Portugal during the "Mestre de Avis" rule, would you be kind enough to vectorize it and release the result in PD?--Saoshyant 13:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm? Se puder perguntar, és Português?--Saoshyant 14:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado pela resposta. Tenho que procurar o dito brasão que gostaria que fosse vectorizado.

Em relação a imagem da direita

, há algo de errado nela. Parece simplesmente o símbolo actual usado pela nossa selecção de futebol, mas se for real, não é de 1500, já que o escudo brasonal não ganhou essa forma até muito mais tarde (1700 para cima, se não estou em erro). De qualquer maneira, esse tipo de cruz céltica bastardizada que se apresenta no fundo da imagem era usado para fins navais; isso sim, é verdade. Tanto os Espanhois como os Portugueses a usavam nas velas das caravelas e naus, com um senão: a cruz original era de braços iguais, quer dizer, nenhuma extremidade era maior que a outra. Era um design celta que foi sendo modificado com os anos até se assemelhar ao que se apresenta na imagem à direita. Em conclusão, esta configuração de cruz, tal como esse formato de escudo, não era até onde sei usada no século 16.

Espero que isto tenha ajudado.--Saoshyant 17:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Encontrei o brasão que gostaria que fosse vectorizado, se possível. Foi usado na bandeira Portuguesa desde o reinado de D. João I a D. João II (1385-1495)--Saoshyant 14:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:COA of Argentina.svg

Thank you for the SVG COA of Argentina. It is very good and almost perfect.

The only thing that could be improved are the laurel arround the shield.

The left twig should have 23 leaves on the inside and 25 on the outside. The right one should have 21 on the inside and 20 on the outside. Don't ask me why but that is the official description. --ALE! ¿…? 20:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The ratio of the shield should also be 14:11 your's is more like 4:3. --ALE! ¿…? 21:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A description of the number of laurel leaves can be found here: http://www.edusalta.gov.ar/portal/digesto/descargar.php?archivo=../descargas/digesto/decretos/reglamento_egb.pdf (Page 64). --ALE! ¿…? 10:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the new version. I still have some points. The ratio (14:11) is still not correct. Maybe you could paint the ellipse 700px high and 550px wide. The number of leaves looks good, but the last leaf on the outside looks like a double leaf. Maybe you could just paint one. The band at the bottom uniting the two twigs should be light blue-white-light blue, your's is only light-blue. One more point are the colors. Please use RGB 75AADB for light-blue, RGB FCBF49 for the sun and RGB 843511 for the mouth, eyes and so on of the sun. (See: de:Flagge_Argentiniens#Offizielle_Farben_der_Flagge). Besides of these little things, I think that the COA is already pretty cool. Thank you again! --ALE! ¿…? 21:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! :)

Hi, Amakukha; I´m the author of Image:Flag John V of Portugal with Order of Christ.svg. I´d like to understand what did you mean with dimer, since I might improve it. Thanks for you help! = ) --Tonyjeff 02:59, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

This one means that some colors at your picture are not as brigth as they are at the .png image, and I, personally, prefer bright colors. Yet your picture looks wonderful! It's a pleasure to cooperate :) --Amakukha 14:17, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

De nada

De nada, Tonyjeff. Agora, gostaria de apressar a votação antes que um espertinho apareça fazendo mais uma daquelas perguntas e oposições imbecis. Abraço. DuqueVisconde 05:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Outra coisa: poderia pedir para dar sua opinião aqui? Abraço. DuqueVisconde 09:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Olá, Tonyjeff. Acabei de ver seu voto e sua sugestão. Obrigado pelo voto e vou levar em consideração sua sugestão – já vinha querendo tirar o negrito há tempos, mas estive envolvido com outras coisas. Farei ainda hoje. Se você quiser vetorizar os símbolos da cidade, eu ficaria gratíssimo, pois não tenho quaisquer talentos nesse sentido e admiro seu trabalho. Já havia visto antes aquele símbolo das bandeiras giratórias, que achei interessante, mas também gostei dos outros, sobretudo os símbolos do Brasil Imperial, no qual sou fixado. Além dos agradecimentos, tenho uma pergunta a lhe fazer: eu poderia votar naquela discussão? Não sei se o direito ao voto no Commons funciona como na pt wikipedia. Tenho pouco mais de 100 edições aqui. Agora vou-me dormir. Abraço. DuqueVisconde 11:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado pelo aviso, mas aquilo não é uma votação de deleção (ao contrário do que acontece na pt.wikipedia, que importa apenas a quantia de pessoas que assina debaixo de alguma opção), mas sim debate, onde o que conta é a argumentação. Lugusto • ҉ 19:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

simbolos oficiais do brasil

obrigado pelo aviso, fico contente por essa discussão finalmente se encerrar, já que ela nunca fez sentido para mim. sinceramente acho que existe uma paranóia excessiva acerca do copyright no commons... Waldir 21:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Translation in Arabic

translation in arabic جمهورية الكمر الإتحادية الإسلامي Republique Federale Islamique de Comores. Kafka1 February 16,2007

Hi This is the official name جمهورية جزر القمر الاتحادية الإسلامية Republique Federale Islamique des iles Comores as written on the Arab parliament site [1] or you can write this جمهورية القمر الاتحادية الإسلامية Republique Federale Islamique de Comores because the one that Kafka has written has a spelling mistakeOmar86 23:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How can I send you the arabic vectorized name of Comoros?

To Tonyjeff, i finished the work of vectorizing Arabic name of Comoros.It is a Photoshop file.How can i send it? Thanks - From Zohair Harb --زهير حرب 20:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Irak and Egypt

For Irak الجمهورية العراقية and Egypt I can't read the first word in the image. If u want the translation of Arab Republic of Egypt جمهورية مصر العربية. Kafka1 February 20, 2007

Iraq and Egypt COAs

There are minor text issues with these images. On the lower left of Image:COA of Egypt.svg , the "b" ب and "y" ي of al-`Arabiya العربية do not actually connect.

In Image:COA of Iraq.svg , there are orientation and spacing issues with some of the letters. The alif ا of al-Jumhuriya الجمهورية is set at an odd angle with respect to the rest of the word. There's a big gap between the "r" ر and "a" ا of al-`Iraqiya العراقية , while the next three letters ("aqy") are jammed extremely tightly together. You may need to really bend the letters (as on Image:Palestine COA.svg, instead of just rotating each letter (or sequence of connected letters) at a slightly different angle... AnonMoos 17:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes , the problems have been solved... AnonMoos 16:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Palestine COA.svg

Of course partner! your draws are better than mine; i'm glad you can change the Palestine COA in order to get a good equality in all the saladino's eagles!!! chers! --Jyon 03:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq COA

A very good job . I have a doubt about the COA of Iraq . The arabic text written in the COA you've made is الجمهورية العراقية (the iraqi republic) but the on the site of the Embassy of IRAQ in Canberra , Australia ([2] from ) it is written جمهورية العراق (The republic of Iraq) . Omar86 11:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image re-uploads

The info you put into the main description box on the image upload page only becomes part of the image description page the very first time that an image is uploaded. If you're re-uploading an image on top of an already-existing image of the same name, then the contents of the box only have the effect of appearing parenthesized on the file upload summary -- otherwise they're not added to the page. So you don't need to put all the licensing info, general description of purpose of image, etc. in the box every time when you re-upload -- instead just briefly describe the changes you've made with respect to previous versions of the image. AnonMoos 14:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Letters in heraldry"

Also Category:Letters in heraldry should not be used when there's just a name or motto on a scroll above or below the main emblem (which is extremely common, and not worth noting), but rather when letters are significantly part of the main central emblem or coat of arms. AnonMoos 14:05, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:COA of Syria.svg

Good job on Image:COA of Syria.svg... -- AnonMoos 23:15, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Opinion

Opinei na discussão daquela imagem. Mas não entendi bem o que houve por lá.... o site do Museu Imperial não possui nenhuma (para o caso da imagem, falsa) reinvidicação de copyright... Alguém recebeu algum e-mail de reclamação? Lugusto • ※ 17:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tonyjeff, também eu não entendi o que houve naquela discussão. Poderia me dar os antecedentes? Abraço. DuqueVisconde 06:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comoros COA

On Image:COA of Comoros.svg, the last word appears to be cut short; it should be الإسلامية , not just الإسل ... If you look closely at Image:Comoros coa.png, that's what you see... -- AnonMoos 16:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. The official Arabic spelling seems to be القمر , not الكمر -- see ar:جزر القمر . AnonMoos 16:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Emailuser/AnonMoos

My bad

It's correct now, except that I copied the text from the Arabic Wikipedia article ar:جزر القمر into the description on the Image:COA of Comoros.svg, and overlooked the fact that there's actually a mistake in that article! The third word should be الاتحادية not الإتحادية -- Omar86 had it correct on this page above. The mistake is minor, and one which many Arabs themselves would make, but... AnonMoos 19:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected it now (deleted bad hamza from Image:COA of Comoros.svg). AnonMoos 00:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Libyan CoA

The phrase on the Libyan CoA seems to be the same as that on the COA and flag of the old Federation of Arab republics -- see Image:Flag of Egypt 1972.svg ... AnonMoos 22:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Moon in heraldry

Why did you establish Category:Moon in heraldry when Category:Crescents in heraldry has already existed? AnonMoos 16:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Imperial Coat of Arms of Brazil.png

The page says, "CoA of Empire of Brazil (1822 - 1889)". This means the coat of arms was created, at the latest, in 1822. It's impossible for the original author not to have been dead for the past 70 years. Yonatanh 14:39, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a derivative of the original coat of arms and therefore contains little to no creativity and is still in the public domain in the United States per Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. (as is the svg version which is also a derivative). Yonatanh 17:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it's good to see users who put the effort in to learn. ;) Yonatanh 00:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CastelloBranco.gif

Hi there, please join the discussion about this and similar photos taken from the Brazilian government. --Stigmj 09:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:COA_of_Israel.svg

Image deletion warning

Image:COA_of_Israel.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yonatan ^talk 09:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:COA_of_Israel.svg - 2

Sorry, I do not have any clue of Isrealian copyright. So I can not help. --ALE! ¿…? 13:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise

I know a little Hebrew, but couldn't help on Israeli law... AnonMoos 15:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sicilia

Tony, quando você tiver tempo, faria esse teu maravilhoso trabalho de vetorização com a bandeira e brasão da Sicília:

Não sei se você precisa de outros elementos, se for o caso, avise. Abraços, Dantadd✉ 20:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Existem várias versões da Trinacria/Triscele (o símbolo no centro). Vou te mandar algumas versões por email para que você possa ter uma idéia. Obrigadão! Dantadd✉ 15:41, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah...já existe uma versão vetorizada aqui no Commons: Image:Flag of Sicily.svg, mas na minha opinião é HORRÍVEL. A estética da Triscele é péssima. O ideal seria usar a Triscele como nestas versões (Image:Bannerasicilia.gif, Image:Stemmasicilia.jpg) que eu te apontei acima, mas que têm baixa resolução. Dantadd✉ 15:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong way

It'd be helpful if you could provide a diff... Yonatan ^talk 19:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, I have no idea what you're talking about and it'd be helpful if you provided a link so I understand what you're talking about. I also resent your accusation that I'm a vandal. Yonatan ^talk 19:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, since the community chose me to be an admin, I doubt the same community would consider me to be a vandal. Secondly, I made one bad edit two months ago when I was still a newbie here. Aren't people allowed to make mistakes or do we need to straightaway jump to the [false] accusations stage? Either way, {{SupersededSVG}} is probably gonna be deleted soon anyway and I feel that {{Vector version available}} is much better for use on that particular page since it isn't an exact replica. Besides, if I felt strongly about it, I wouldn't see the need to post on the image page saying that I think it should be changed to {{Vector version available}}, I'd be bold and edit it, then if anyone disagrees with me they're more than welcome to contact me on my talk page so long as they keep the accusations out of it. Yonatan ^talk 20:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, yes, it pretty much does as if I were a vandal (ie. had intention of hurting the project, it isn't vandalism if there's no intention) I wouldn't have become an administrator. Secondly, I never insisted upon it. I made a mistake and I admitted to it (ie. I said, "I made a bad edit"), obviously the template shouldn't have been changed to {{SVG}} but possibly to {{Vector version available}} so I don't see where the problem is. I probably meant to change that template to {{Vector version available}} in the first place, would you have been opposed to such a change too? Either way, you're coming on too strongly and are definitely not assuming good faith - including the word vandal in a post regarding a tiny edit from two months ago - is not assuming good faith. Yonatan ^talk 20:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PNG vs. SVG

Please don't change COA as you like it. You should check with each local version of the WP if the replacement of PNG-COA through SVG-COA is appreciated or not. Replacing it without asking is bad behaviour, at least. --213.155.224.232 17:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IE6 and SVG here

re: IE6 and SVG here

xpost

re: Hi there, Frank! I´d like just to observe that not always IE6 has problems with SVG extension, and in many cases the file may be corrected in order to be well viewable by IE6 users. It is a matter to firstly test the file in different browser and make the needed adjustments. Cheers. --Tonyjeff 17:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but that's irrelevant to the time cost of the moment, not to mention the reliability worries when coming across a problem as an article editor. It's hard enough to get text straight and position HTML elements properly so as to minimize whitespace useage without taking a distractive side trip to fix up an image with a problem. That circumstance simply means I found an image or resized one that that cost me extra time when I have little enough to volunteer as is; so such jarred my elbow whilst I'm likely editing in three or four related articles, and does little to ease the peace of mind as to what the customers may see.

I keep my browsers free of extensions and scripts and such and use the default skin specifically so I can see what the customers see as a rendered page, and this is worrisome to me with my eye on the big picture. An isolated occurrence is NBD, but the half-dozen or more I've seen raise sincere concerns that we need to make progress more deliberately more slowly.

My harsh rehetoric was purposeful to make that issue clear! However your assurance does suggest there ought to be a tag for such problems so some body of people who do have an interest in editing images can address such fixups. Maybe I should propose THAT here and on WP:VPT!) Cheers and thanks! // FrankB 18:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2nd post

I'll just add this here: Image:Deutschland Lage von Thüringen.svg is malfunctioning currently in Firefox v2 in the article: w:1632 series... width is set for 200px by ({tlxw|1632width}}. The pic just doesn't manifest whatever. // FrankB 02:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC) (Check post:Template:Ute)[reply]

Brasão da Argentina

Olá,

De nada, parece-me que há gente que quer apagar tudo e mais alguma coisa... Bem, eu não percebo muito do assunto. Mas pelo que vi, através dos seus argumentos, existem diversas versões oficiais. Não tendo eu capacidade crítica de avaliar se tal imagem pode ser melhorada de algum modo, penso que está bem como está. Cumprimentos! PatríciaR ^msg 17:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:COA_Brazilian_Navy.svg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:COA_Brazilian_Navy.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 08:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Horto Navarro de Andrade 1.jpg

You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. Oxam Hartog 22:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Horto Navarro de Andrade 2.jpg

You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. Oxam Hartog 22:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SVG bloat

In the coat of arms SVG's you've been recently uploading, each wavy indented line adds almost 280 kilobytes of vector code to the SVG file! There's probably a better way... AnonMoos 17:29, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it has much to do with the upload process -- it's just that the underlying SVG coding of the indented wavy lines is radically inefficent and bloated, so that an image like Image:COA Baron of Maraú.svg (which would probably be about 30kb in length if it were coded consistently throughout) has ballooned to over 800kb in length... AnonMoos 23:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably no need to delete the "16:34, 6 August 2007" version of Image:COA Baron of Maraú.svg -- people are improving images all the time... AnonMoos 23:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mensagem que me deixou

Tony, deixei uma mensagem para ti também na Wikipédia. Agora que entrei, vi as mensagens que me deixou, mas não tenho tido tempo de logar na Wikipédia, portanto desculpe por não respondê-lo. Aliás, só entrei agora porque alguém me falou que viu os artigos sendo deletados, então loguei e vi sua mensagem. Coloquei esclarecimentos a respeito dos assuntos (este, este, este e este). Peço que retorne à página onde registrou seu voto e reconsidere sua posição em vista de meus esclarecimentos. Sou contribuidor de longa data com a Wikipédia e não teria criado tais artigos não fossem eles sérios. Ademais, não se trata de pesquisa inédita, mas de um adiantamento de algo que está sendo publicado pelo Instituto Histórico e Geográfico de Mato Grosso do Sul. Fontes confiáveis também foram colocadas nos artigos. Muito obrigado, DuqueVisconde 18:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Image Tagging Image:S.Mateus.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:S.Mateus.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 12:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Palestine_COA.svg

Hi Tonyjeff,

You are listed as the author of Image:Palestine_COA.svg. I'm wondering what was your source for creating this image. The source you listed (http://www.flaggenlexikon.de/fpalaest.htm#Wappen) uses a different color, and has a different (illegible) text at the bottom. It is also unclear whose COA this is: The PNA? the "State of Palestine"? The PLO?

Thanks, Uriber 21:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found http://www.wasmap.net/_borders/logopenacard.gif (embedded as a thumbnail in http://www.wasmap.net/). In this image, the words on the banner are السلطة الفلسطينية ("The Palestinian Authority"). Would you consider updating your SVG images with this text? Thanks, Uriber 19:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also here: http://piccit.ppu.edu/images/palAu.jpg. Uriber 20:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I created Image:Palestinian_National_Authority_COA.svg based on your "alternate" design, with the modified text. Uriber 22:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heraldic vector graphic creation

I see that you have done a lot of work creating Vector graphics of Heraldic devices. I am quite a heraldry buff, and I've got to say that you've done a great job; I'm really impressed. On a related note, I have images of a Heraldic device, a shield, derived from the Coffin family (Devonshire, England) Coat of Arms. The Coffin family's manor, called Portledge, is also a School in New York, United States, which was founded by a member of the Coffin line. The School has adopted the Coffin Shield as its own, and as a main contributer to various Wikipedia articles concerning the school I am very interested in using a Vector graphic version of the Shield.

As a person interested in Heraldry, you would most likely find the Shield fascinating; it is of a somewhat rare design, and uses a few elements rarely seen in English Heraldry. Would you mind at least looking over the non-Vector images, and consider perhaps creating Vector versions? I'd really appreciate it. You can find them at User:RideABicycle/Imagelist

Thanks, RideABicycle 03:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms of Ireland

Just a suggestion that I contribute to the Coat of Irish State. The link leads to a talk page about the CoA of Ireland. On that talk page there is a link to the fine detailed CoA of Ireland.

Rainman 21:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

w:List of colors use #C0C0C0 RGB (192,192,192) for Silver colour in its computer representation.

Also en:Silver (color) could be of some reference.

FOTW has a Colour guide that here. They simply use Light grey for heraldic representation of Silver colour. That is RGB (204,204,204).

There is no official colour scheme for the Irish State Coat of arms to be found. I tryed to find any official information but sources are somewhat scarce and difficult to find.

I think that we should not make a big deal about this. You decide weather you have time to use those sources I supplied.

Rainman 19:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of the President of Irish State

I do not want for you to think that I am picking on you personally. I most certainly do not. I have just found this information an think you should know. There is no doubt that this information is true, and colours that represent gold are present on the Presidential Standard of the Irish State. Still, if you want the matter could be discussed; but Discussions often lead to colision of oppinions which are not supstantiated by evidence; instead of evidences users can recolect even their memory and personal experiences (not to say belifs even if this would be more often the case).

You can do with this information whatever you want, go with it, or not. I have just reported it, nothing more, nothing less.

Colour of strings on the Presidential Standard is yellow.

Title: The Wolfhound Guide to The Irish Harp Emblem
Medium: book
Main author(s): Séamus Ó Brógáin
Edition (publisher: place): The Wolfhound Press: Dublin (Ireland)
Language: English
Edition date: 1998
Catalogue codes: ISBN 0-86327-635-0 = ISBN 978-0-86327-635-4
Pages: 76

"This flag was approved by the Government on 13 February 1945. A number of technical decisions were made at the same time, including the decision that ... the strings of the harp be yellow (in settlement of the question raised by Edward MacLysaght, who had insisted that the strings should be white)." - a quotation from the above mentioned book.

Rainman 00:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A primeira já foi, mas...

... a segunda, estou a ver até que ponto se pode aplicar a {{PD-BrazilGov}}, o que me levou a ler a L9279 e a preocupar-me com o texto que está na predefinição... o artigo 191 não tem nada a ver com o texto da predef :S Patrícia ^msg 12:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Imagens de moedas e notas brasileiras

Sim, por dois motivos:

O seu suor não produz novos direitos autorais. A autoria continuaria sendo da pessoa/entidade original. Muitos usuários novatos carregam imagens tiradas de outros sites, ou mesmo escaneadas de outros livros, afirmando a autoria ser deles. Eu achei é diferente de eu fiz.
Mesmo se produzisse novos direitos autorais, seria um trabalho derivado: você precisaria da autorização do autor original para produzir uma derivação e lançá-la sob algum dos termos de copyleft aceitos pelo Commons.

Boas contribuições Lugusto • ※ 16:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great cleanup!

This cleanup Image:Bardez-Salsete.svg is great! Thank you so very much. Regards, Nichalp (talk) 07:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

COA of Bombay

Hi! No obligation of course, but if it is possible, could you create one of your fantastic COA for Mumbai: w:Image:SealofMumbai.jpg. Additional details on the logos are here: w:Coat of arms of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. Nichalp (talk) 05:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Escudos /brasões

Hola, no he entendido el motivo de tu consulta (entiendes bien el idioma? if not we can switch to english) sobre el escudo de Castilla-La Mancha. Sobre el Wikiproyecto, es un proyecto de wikipedia sobre heráldica y vexilología, igual que otros en otros idiomas, con cierta pretensión para abarcar la heráldica hispanoamericana o iberoamericana ;). He visto que has hecho muchos escudos de linajes brasileños, y es un material muy interesante :) Salutacões! --HansenBCN (talk) 10:36, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado :) Exactamente; el Taller nos sirve como vehículo para compartir, y formalizar un formato estándar: el tamaño del escudo, los colores, las figuras, y las coronas. En nuestro caso, también hay dificultad para imponer nuestros modelos sobre otros, pues muchos usuarios prefieren mantener el escudo-emblema que usa su gobierno local. Si no es incoherente con la descripción, entonces mantenemos esa versión en los artículos, porque, verdaderamente, no está mal (pero podría estar mejor, hehe). Si hacemos otras versiones estandarizadas, las utilizamos en artículos o secciones más específicos (ejemplo, Escudo de Madrid). Al igual que Brasil, los demás países americanos tienen poca tradición heráldica, y para algún escudo latinoamericano hemos tenido dificultad (por ejemplo, con blasonados infantiles o poco correctos). En cualquier caso, cada caso es único y debe considerarse soluciones diferentes. Sobretodo, consideramos importante trabajar en SVG y con fuente escrita, como fundamento del escudo, y no otras imágenes; algo difícil de conseguir para algunos escudos. El wikiproyecto francés Blasons trabaja de un modo similar, pero con otro estilo visual. Estoy a tu disposición para cualquier ayuda :) --HansenBCN (talk) 19:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

informação:

Gostaria de saber se Tonyjeff tem algum site com seu armorial ou desenhos de seu brasoes. Sou amante da Heraldica e sobretudo a das casa reais europeias. Como fazer para entrar em contato com o artista e heraldista Tonyfeff ? Nunca participei de grupos de conversa por internet ou coisa parecida. Mas gostaria muito de entrar em contato com o artista que ilustra os brasoes da Wikipedia. Já publicou algum armorial ? No aguardo de uma notícia, Francisco Vieira E onde vejo a resposta deste e-mail ? o meu é : francisco.vieira@tvglobo.com.br

Grito do Ipiranga

Bom dia Tonyjeff. Gostaria de lhe pedir a gentileza de carregar novamente a imagem do quadro O Grito do Ipiranga, mas como um novo arquivo, e não sobrepor ao arquivo já existente. Isso porque a versão que vc carregou tem cores muito diferentes em especial na parte do céu, desaparecendo todo o azul e as nuvens. obrigado tetraktys (talk) 18:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

obrigado pela gentileza, Tonyjeff! um abraço!tetraktys (talk) 20:34, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cplp.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:Cplp.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 11:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ei, deletaram a imagem de novo? Agora que me toquei como a imagem era *lesado*. Mas me diz uma coisa, no site da CPLP possui a versão animada? Se não for ainda assim não há motivos para deletá-la, pois ela "seria" derivada de uma imagem fora do limiar de originalidade. Portanto não seria infração de forma alguma. Mas tb me diz uma coisa, não tem como vc mandar um email pedindo para eles esclarecerem que o autor da imagem é vc? Seria bem mais fácil. Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 05:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aí é que tá. Mesmo o logotipo não sendo liberado ele é muito simples e não se encontra no limiar de originalidade. Ele pode ser caregado de boa aqui e servir como base para outros trabalhos. Mas o que é mais importante ainda é que a idéia original é sua. Eu insisto que tente contato com CPLP pedindo que ela afirme isso. Vai ser até melhor pra ti pq vc não passará por mentiroso e saberão das sua habilidades com imagens pensando bem antes dejulgar qualquer outro trabalho seu.Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 22:22, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ajuda

Olá. Para você que tem mais prática, poderia ver se fiz certo nessa votação? Abraço. Vini 175 (talk) 03:16, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Tonyjeff!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:COA Baron of Avelar e Almeida.svg is uncategorized since 26 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ficou boa...

a cara do conde. Uma titica que eu não tenha conseguido até hoje aprender a trabalhar com o photoshop - tudo o que faço é usar o corel photopaint...

Já tentei aprender, mas a linguagem da Adobe não é (ao menos pra mim) nada amigável - aliás, parece que ela é minha inimigável! Vou olhar as coisas que já mandei, vai que tenha alguma outra apagada precisando do teu know-how?

Abraços, André Koehne^{TALK TO ME} 19:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brasao cg ed.jpg

Maybe you should focus more on improving the extremely poor quality of the image version you prefer, rather than edit-warring... AnonMoos (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice if you could devote some of the energy you display in trying to get admins to take your side towards improving the image instead, considering that it's currently of such very low quality as to be almost unusable for any purpose whatsoever. AnonMoos (talk) 16:28, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of the Kingdom of Portugal

Bom dia, parabéns pelo seu trabalho en

, mas queria perguntar se, para que seja muito melhor, mas poderia fazer outra versão com a coroa em 2 dimensões, para que seja mais detalhado, você acha?

I cant speak portuguese, but I understand english and I speak spanish...you can answer me, if you want, in this page Mel^Parlez 02:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC) Es un excelente dibujo, y sólo hace falta cambiarle la almohada de la corona .[reply]
lo felicito nuevamente y muchas gracias por su espontánea amabilidad!

It is an excellent drawing and only it is necessary to change the pillow of the wreath...

I congratulate you again and thank you on your spontaneous amiability--Mel^Parlez 02:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disculpe por tanta molestia, pero también me gustaría saber si puede hacer lo mismo con el escudo si fuese posible...Pero no quiero que esto sea mucha cantidad de trabajo para usted .
Mel

^Parlez 02:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias nuevamente por este favor, y por supuesto que puedo aguardarlo hasta la semana próxima, suerte con la gaita asturiana, viva la cultura celta ibérica, vivan los lusitanos!

--Mel

^Parlez 17:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour ami!
Si quieres, cuando la imagen esté lista, ya no va a hacer falta que viajes hasta la wikipedia en español, puedes dejármela aquí mismo, pues me he hecho una página =)!
un saludo oh noble artista
--Mel^Parlez 20:54, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[3]

- Ssolbergj (talk) 20:51, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]