User talk:The7bab
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:42, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Vasily-artemiev.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Vasily-artemiev.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vasily-artemiev.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:05, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Taylor Sheridan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:08, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Taylor+Sheridan+Esquire+Celebrates+March+Cover+l-yYTHjuq3xl.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Taylor+Sheridan+Esquire+Celebrates+March+Cover+l-yYTHjuq3xl.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:42, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Srostki.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Srostki.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Srostki.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:43, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Kirill-golosnitsky.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:45, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
File:LOGO DEPOT.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Коротаева Марика Валерьевна.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Коротаева Марика Валерьевна.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Коротаева Марика Валерьевна.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Barnaul-metro-logo.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Barnaul-metro-logo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Barnaul-metro-logo.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Anton-lissov-jane-air.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Anton-lissov-getty.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Anton-lissov-getty.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Anton-lissov-getty.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
INS Pirat (talk) 15:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Кронштадт. Остров Фортов. Макет.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Ytoyoda (talk) 22:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Vadik Korolev.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Skazi.
And also:
- File:Nkk-logo.jpg ( Nominator : Skazi - Reason : not own, non free )
- File:Кронштадт. Остров Фортов. Форт Император Александр I, «Чумной».jpg ( Nominator : Skazi - Reason : http://www.bonpla.cat/el/fort-alexander-saint-petersburg + https://www.rotka.org/sirlar-kalesi-fort-alexander/ )
- File:Туристы на ялах пересекают Телецкое Озеро, 1969 год..jpg ( Nominator : Skazi - Reason : https://letimkudahotim.ru/bulyzhniki-77-marshruta/ - 2016 )
- File:Belokuriha-2.jpg ( Nominator : Skazi - Reason : https://letimkudahotim.ru/kak-proekhat-v-belokurikhu-2/ )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Vadik-korolev.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Vadik-korolev.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vadik-korolev.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Hair-extension-hot.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Hair-extension-lenta.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Hair-extension-afro.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]
Hello The7bab.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
--Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sorry about that. I realized my mistake and will be more attentive. The7bab (talk) 08:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Hair-extension-hidden.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Hair-extension-hot.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Sasha-novikov.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Sasha-novikov.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Mitte27 (talk) 01:12, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Коллега, спасибо за предупреждение. Письменное разрешение в OTRS отправил. The7bab (talk) 07:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Viktor Lavrenko.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Komarof (talk) 19:36, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:1964 год, визит президента Финляндии Урхо Калева Кекконена на завод им. Калинина.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1964 год, визит президента Финляндии Урхо Калева Кекконена на завод им. Калинина.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Komarof (talk) 19:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Krutikov Alexandr Viktorovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Komarof (talk) 19:40, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Bansu-kuray-shoots.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Komarof (talk) 19:42, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Potočari Genocide Memorial and UN blockpost.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Komarof (talk) 19:44, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте @Komarof, это фото я сделал неделю назад на свой телефон в рамках поездки по соседней стране. В чем состоит преступление публикации моего собственного снимка на Викискладе? The7bab (talk) 00:00, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Визит Мохаммеда Реза Пехлеви на завод 1972г.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Komarof (talk) 19:45, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Сергей Николаевич Лазарев парапсихолог.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Komarof (talk) 19:46, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Даниил Анатольевич Кислов.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Komarof (talk) 19:47, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Yana-Danilova-VVA-2022.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Komarof (talk) 19:47, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Емельянов Михаил Васильевич депутат Госдумы РФ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Komarof (talk) 19:49, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Крапивников Даниил Аркадьевич.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Komarof (talk) 19:49, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:1958 г. Приказ о переименовании завода в «Таллинский завод ртутных выпрямителей им. М.И. Калинина».jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1958 г. Приказ о переименовании завода в «Таллинский завод ртутных выпрямителей им. М.И. Калинина».jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Komarof (talk) 19:49, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Уважаемый @Komarof, данный снимок был сделан по моей просьбе для загрузки на Викисклад. Он не публиковался где-либо еще до публикации на Викисклад. В чем причина блокировки? The7bab (talk) 23:56, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Пучков Константин Викторович.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Komarof (talk) 19:50, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Уважаемый @Komarof, данный снимок был сделан по моей просьбе для загрузки на Викисклад. Он не публиковался где-либо еще до публикации на Викисклад. В чем причина блокировки? The7bab (talk) 23:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Geyzerovoe-ozero.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Komarof (talk) 19:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Komarof коллега, вы точно уверены в своей претензии приводя источники изображения как: 1. Сайт сомнительного качества, куда изображение было загружено гораздо позже, чем на Викисклад? 2. Оно даже подписано на сайте-источнике с ошибкой. Это не то озеро. The7bab (talk) 23:47, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Prequel logo dark.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Prequel logo dark.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Prequel logo dark.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Komarof (talk) 19:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:GECF Structure.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:GECF Structure.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Komarof (talk) 19:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Уважаемый @Komarof, я автор этой схемы. По какой причине создал алерт к удалению? The7bab (talk) 23:52, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
COM:AN/U
[edit]
File:Аллея имени Бориса Немцова.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Komarof (talk) 20:01, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Уважаемый @Komarof, данное фото сделано моим другом в Софии специально для загрузки на Викисклад. В чем причина его блокировки? The7bab (talk) 23:53, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Your account has been blocked
[edit]--Yann (talk) 21:08, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
@Taivo, я благодарен вам за ссылку. Я читал эти правила и прочту еще раз. Более того, я вижу, что не все правила относительно лицензирования объектов медиа локализованы для Ру-Вики и готов помочь с этим. Я не оспариваю блокировку, я понимаю в чем мои нарушения относительно файлов, находящихся в несвободном использовании. Чего я не понимаю, это следующих причин удаления: Low resolution — где в правилах можно взять ссылку о запрете загрузки изображений с низким разрешением. Какой разрешение считается приемлемым, какое нет? missing EXIF — где в правилах это указано? uploaded by a serial copyright violator — поправьте меня, если не так, но оценивать нужно конкретное изображение и соответствие его лицензированию, а не личность загружающего. made not in the country the uploader is from — где в правилах есть информация, что можно загружать изображения, которые относятся только к собственной стране проживания? The7bab (talk) 12:50, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- См. COM:PCP/ru + COM:EVID/ru. Если загружающий систематически приводит ложные сведения об авторстве, источнике и лицензии загружаемых изображений, он вызывает устойчивое недоверие к своим загрузкам, после чего в рассмотрение берётся достоверность всех остальных сведений, имеющихся в загруженных файлах: метаданных EXIF, модели используемых камер, вероятность производства снимков в отдалённых от загружающего местностях, разрешение файлов и т.п. В случае, если загружающий действительно является автором загруженных снимков, для него не представит сложности загрузка исходных версий изображений в том виде, в котором они созданы камерой: с полными исходными метаданными и в высоком разрешении. Если же он такие версии под надуманными предлогами предоставить отказывается, то сомнения являются обоснованными. Доказывать заявленное авторство и свободное распространение изображения обязан загрузивший: COM:EVID. При наличии обоснованных сомнений файл должен быть удалён: COM:PCP. --Komarof (talk) 14:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Komarof, благодарю за разъяснения. Стало понятнее, хоть в правилах я и не смог найти подобного пункта. Когда кончится блокировка я буду использовать исходные файлы своих изображений. The7bab (talk) 14:51, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Все возможные сомнения в правилах оговорить возможности нет. Есть обобщающая формулировка: Если возникают какие-либо вопросы, то, возможно, потребуется предоставить доказательства того, что [истинный] правообладатель действительно выпустил файл под данной лицензией. Вынесение файла на обычное удаление (в отличие от быстрого удаления при наличии явных грубых нарушений) — это предоставление загрузившему времени для ответа на заданные вопросы. Судя по вашим ответам, в ряде случаев вы не понимаете сути вопросов. Так, право определять свободу распространения принадлежит только автору произведения, а в случае производной работы — разрешения должны быть даны и правообладателем оригинальной работы и автором производной (за редким исключением в зависимости от характера и возраста оригинального произведения). --Komarof (talk) 15:04, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Komarof, благодарю за разъяснения. Стало понятнее, хоть в правилах я и не смог найти подобного пункта. Когда кончится блокировка я буду использовать исходные файлы своих изображений. The7bab (talk) 14:51, 13 August 2023 (UTC)