User talk:Thales Rodrigues de Miranda

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Thales Rodrigues de Miranda!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Colar de Alta Distinção do Mérito Judiciário Militar.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Colar de Alta Distinção do Mérito Judiciário Militar.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:39, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Insígnia para Bandeiras e Estandartes da Ordem do Mérito Judiciário Militar.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Insígnia para Bandeiras e Estandartes da Ordem do Mérito Judiciário Militar.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Insígnia para Bandeiras e Estandartes da Ordem do Mérito Judiciário Militar.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

O revolucionário aliado (talk) 00:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Medalha de Distinção da Ordem do Mérito Judiciário Militar.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Medalha de Distinção da Ordem do Mérito Judiciário Militar.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Medalha de Distinção da Ordem do Mérito Judiciário Militar.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

O revolucionário aliado (talk) 00:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Medalha de Bons Serviços da Ordem do Mérito Judiciário Militar.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Medalha de Bons Serviços da Ordem do Mérito Judiciário Militar.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Medalha de Bons Serviços da Ordem do Mérito Judiciário Militar.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

O revolucionário aliado (talk) 00:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:O SUBMARINO ALEMÃO U-35 NA CAPA DA REVISTA LIFE EM 1939.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:O SUBMARINO ALEMÃO U-35 NA CAPA DA REVISTA LIFE EM 1939.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:O SUBMARINO ALEMÃO U-35 NA CAPA DA REVISTA LIFE EM 1939.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

O revolucionário aliado (talk) 00:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Dornier DO 17.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dornier DO 17.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dornier DO 17.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

O revolucionário aliado (talk) 00:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Tripulação do 5K+AR.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tripulação do 5K+AR.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tripulação do 5K+AR.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

O revolucionário aliado (talk) 00:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

I had just posted a help request, but it disapeared

Need help with Babel boxes. Does anyone out there know how to deal with such modernities? Thank you! Thales Rodrigues de Miranda (talk) 16:42, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Arthur Adam.jpg

File:Arthur Adam.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: incorrect copyright information, Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Articseahorse (talk) 03:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Dear Articseahorse I have uploaded this file because I picked up in a World War picture forum with "Author unkmnown" copyright. I have uploaded this file, so that, Wikimedia Commons, having a wordwide penetration can confirm this fact before publishing the file. Thales Rodrigues de Miranda (talk) 17:25, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

The main issue is that you uploaded it and placed a license that you took that photo. What I recommend is looking into seeing what copyright laws Germany has.

I see! Because I have uploaded it in Brazil and here if you do not find the author after a fairly due diligence, mainly concerning pictures more than 50 years old, for example, if you are not making any profit, you can use it as far as you put a note like: "We have looked for the author and have not found it. There is no copyright note. In case you are the author of this file, please enter in contact and we will either remove it or enter into agreement to use". This picture is circulating in Brazil, but where was it taken? Maybe in Poland, maybe in Germany... Thales Rodrigues de Miranda (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

But Germany is weird with their copyright laws, their courts ruled the following.

Back in November 2015, we wrote about a bad situation in Germany, where a museum in Mannheim was suing the Wikimedia Foundation over photos of public domain works of art, which were uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Sadly, since then, things have not gone well for the public domain. No less than three German courts -- in Berlin, Stuttgart and now again in a higher Stuttgart court -- have ruled against the use of the photos. The latest court judgment is available in full (pdf in German), and it contains some pretty worrying statements.

For example, the upper Stuttgart court confirms that the museum's photographs of the public domain works are not in the public domain, because they were produced by a photographer, and not some mechanical process like a photocopier. Under German law, if there is any kind of creativity involved, however minimal, then the photograph produced enjoys protection as a "Lichtbildwerk" -- literally, a "light image work" -- and is not in the public domain.

The court also ruled that not even photos of works in the public domain taken by a Wikipedia supporter to put on Wikipedia could be used freely by Wikipedia. Making a photo in this way "injured" the museum's ownership of the objects in question, the judges said, even though the works were in the public domain, as a report on the iRights site explained (original in German). In addition, the court said that the museum was within its rights to make it a condition of entry that no photos were taken.

These are clearly dreadful rulings for Wikipedians in Germany. The good news is that the Stuttgart court has allowed an appeal to the country's top court, the Bundesgerichtshof. If even those judges fail to see how crazy this situation is, and how harmful to the public domain, there is always the hope that the Court of Justice of the European Union, the highest court in the EU, might consider the case, but there's no guarantee of that.

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170612/09194237572/multiple-german-courts-rule-photos-public-domain-works-are-not-public-domain.shtml

Articseahorse (talk) 18:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your clarification! It is really very difficult to work in a multijurisdictional environment. I have uploaded the file, but did not add it to the page I have created in Wikipedia abouth Arthur Adam awaiting a orientation from Wikimedia.comons

I have seen cases in Brazil that two different Judges have decided that a picture of a work of art was and was not subject of the copyright of the author of the same kind work of art. As this was in a sole jurisdiction, I can imagine the difficulties to decide when multiple jurisdictions are involved. What is needed here is Something like the Berna Convention, to limit the number of years of copyrights of authors uniformily all over the world! Thales Rodrigues de Miranda (talk) 18:50, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Arthur Adam.jpg

File:Arthur Adam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 12:51, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Irving Wallace 2.jpg

File:Irving Wallace 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andre Engels (talk) 20:07, 23 March 2021 (UTC)