User talk:Tambo/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:Horváth János.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 14:00, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Pálos György.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 22:59, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Lőte szobor 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 20:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
File:14d.Regnum Marianum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 15:35, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
File:05a.lakóház.Istenhegyi út..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 18:06, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Dr. Kotsis Iván nyaralója Balatonbogláron.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 18:32, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Hajnóczy József.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:03, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Bíró Ica-001 fortepan 124698.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 09:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
File:03a. Pavilon Sopron mezg.kiáll.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 14:11, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
File:József főherceg kastélya Tihanyban.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 14:24, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Somlay Artúr-Hazajáró lélek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 22:37, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Pap István (1915-1994) sírja.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 19:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Horger
Innen is ki szeretnéd tiltatni magad? Jó úton haladsz. --Regasterios (talk) 20:10, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Azt még csak-csak megérteném, hogy a leírólap kitöltésébe belekötsz, azon még lehetne vitatkozni, de az már teljesen érthetetlen, hogy visszaerőlteted a rosszabb minőségű képet, amikor nyilvánvalóan egy és ugyanazon fotóról van szó. Egyik változattól sem lesz jogszerűbb vagy kevésbé jogszerű a kép használata. --Regasterios (talk) 20:19, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
A figyelmeztetésedet kértem. Ha nem csinálnál ökörségeket, nem volna rá szükség. Nem nekem tettél szívességet azzal, hogy megtaláltad a képet, ettől függetlenül ez kétségtelen pozitívum volt a részedről. Ez a körülmény azonban csak még érthetetlenebbé teszi a régi kép erőltetését. Bár értem az iróniát, de még véletlenül sem szeretnék a jóakaród lenni. Megelégszem azzal, ha kérdezel, ahelyett, hogy az előbbihez hasonló akciókba kezdesz. --Regasterios (talk) 20:37, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- A Nagy mellényed dacára te csinálsz ökörségeket. Az általad kicserélt kép semmivel sem jobb, mint ami volt. A különbség annyi, hogy most rá lehet tenni egy watermark sablont is. Ráadásul a kép minősége semmivel sem jobb. Nem tudom, mit kellene kérdeznem? Kétségkívül vannak olyan szerkesztőtársak, akiktől lehet kérdezni, és a véleményük mérvadó. Sajnos nem mindenki ilyen. Sajnos ti is ezek közé tartoztok. Tambo (talk) 20:56, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Az általam feltöltött kép a következő nyilvánvaló okokból jobb minőségű: 1. jóval nagyobb felbontású, több mint kétszer akkora. 2. részletgazdagabb. Szóval ha te képes vagy azt írni, hogy az általam preferált változat semmivel sem jobb minőségű, mint a korábbi, akkor az eléggé azt támasztja alá, hogy nem én velem van a probléma. Amit a kép jobb alsó sarkában látsz amúgy, az nem vízjel, hanem a szerzői jogtulajdonos – sajnos olvashatatlan – logója, vagy ahhoz hasonló. Lényegében persze az is vízjel, de ez egy 100 éves ritka kép, nem Gipsz Jakab századrangú fotója. Az ilyeneknél a szerzői jelölések és hasonlók éppen hogy érdekesebbé teszik a képet, még akkor is, ha ez esetben valóban nem mond semmit. Ettől persze még feltölthetsz új néven egy olyan változatot, amelyikről eltávolítottad a jelet, de legyen olyan változat is, amelyiken ott van. Kérdezned azt kellett volna, hogy miért így csináltam. Bár írtál egy indoklást a fájl vitalapjára, amit helyesen tettél, de hadd kérdezzem meg: ha mondjuk a kezemben lett volna a könyv, és egyenesen onnan szkenneltem volna be a képet, hogyan kellett volna megadnom olyan forrást, ami a képre mutat? Konkrétan az a kép, amit feltöltöttem, közvetlenül a DVD-ROM-ról származik, ezért adtam meg azt forrásnak (az, hogy még a DVD-ROM adatait tartalmazó linket is megadtam, mellékes körülmény). Persze mondhatod, hogy 1914-ben még nem volt DVD, de ha egyszer a kép onnan lett leszedve, és nem tudok olyan linket megadni, ahol a kép megtalálható ekkora méretben a neten, akkor szerinted mit kellett volna odaírni? A fórumos változat belinkelésének, amit most az egyéb verziók paraméterből áthelyeztem a forrásokhoz, egyetlen szerepe van: hogy alátámasszam vele a kép publikálásának évét. Szóval ennyi. De ezt megbeszélhettük volna a kép vitalapján közjáték nélkül is. --Regasterios (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Warning
Hi, Stop editwarring, or you will be blocked. Thanks, Yann (talk) 23:24, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Megkérlek, hogy legközelebb ne az eredeti méretű fotót vagdosd kedved szerint, hanem töltsd fel másik néven a vágott változatot. Mindkét verziónak meglehet a maga illusztrációs szerepe. Köszönöm. --Regasterios (talk) 15:32, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
ːEgyetértve veled, felhívnám a figyelmed, hogy a commonsba, korábban feltöltöttem két , különféle néven feltöltött képet. Így nem tudom pontosan mi a "sarkalatos" problémád? Üdv. Tambo (talk) 18:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Én azt látom a fájltörténetben, hogy az említett képet, amelyet 2016 augusztusában Fae eredeti méretben és változtatás nélkül feltöltött a Commmonsba, te megvágtad (ezzel önmagában nincs baj), aztán a megvágott változatot rátöltötted az eredetire (ezzel már annál inkább), aminek következtében az eredeti verzió a süllyesztőbe került, másképpen fogalmazva: ha valaki használni szerette volna azt a verziót, nem tudta volna, éppen amiatt, mert te rátöltötted a vágott változatot. Ezért kértem azt, hogy a megvágott változatot legközelebb külön fájlként töltsd fel, hogy mindkét változat szükség szerint külön-külön is használható legyen. Azt pedig nem értem, hogy milyen két korábban feltöltött képre gondolsz azon kívül, mint ami ennek a képnek a fájltörténetében látható. --Regasterios (talk) 19:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Category:György Baló Tambo (talk) 08:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Azt már értem, milyen két képre gondolsz. Azt viszont továbbra sem, hogy jön ez ahhoz a problémához, amit felvetettem, mármint ennek a konkrét képnek a kapcsán, amit a szakaszcímbe belinkeltem. --Regasterios (talk) 08:54, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Koszegi tamas copyist.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Koszegi tamas copyist.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 09:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- Én nem töltöttem fel ilyen képet. Egyszerűen kisebbre vettem a szélességi méretét. Tudom, hogy még álmodban is velem foglalkozol, de ez nem jött be. ̴̴Tambo (talk) 10:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
A script automatikusan küld minden feltöltőnek üzenetet, aki feltöltést eszközöl egy adott képen, így kaptál te is, mivel egy feltöltést végeztél ezen a képen, így feltöltőként szerepelsz (érdemes megnézni a Fájltörténet szakaszt (2019. április 16., 09:50-kori pontját). Teljesen mindegy, hogy csak mit csináltál, mert feltöltést végeztél. Úgyhogy kopp. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 10:33, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Bacsa Ildikó-002.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:03, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
- File:Greguss Zoltán kb. 30 éves korában.jpg
- File:Vándory Margit.jpg
- File:Jávor Pál-Bajor Gizi-Ungvári László-Füzess Anna-Nizsinszky-Márkus Tamara.jpg
- File:Füzess Anna.jpg
--Regasterios (talk) 09:02, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
File:Návay Lajos-001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 14:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Továbbá: File:Justh Gyula-001.jpg. --Regasterios (talk) 15:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
File:Unicum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 16:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Dayka Margit-Szerelmi láz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 16:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
File:Üllői út - József körút kereszteződése.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Akela (talk) 12:40, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Üllői út, József körút kereszteződés, Corvin köz, ISZU-152 rohamlöveg (1956) Fortepan 6412.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Akela (talk) 12:55, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Budapest ostroma.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Chaoborus (talk) 21:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JuTa 02:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Szentpétery Imre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 05:28, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Patai Imre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 15:09, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Simonyi Mária.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Gombaszögi Ella.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Kökény Ilona 1910 körül.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Rubinyi Mózes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:51, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Kálmán Imre-001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 17:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Aggházy károly tündértánc(az erdőben sorozatból).ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Glatz Oszkár.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 14:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:10, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Patai Imre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 09:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jávoriék 1964.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jávoriék 1964.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jávoriék 1964.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Regasterios (talk) 11:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Lenz József cropped.JPG
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lenz József cropped.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
sourced to image since deleted as copyvio Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 17:55, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Kabay János.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 12:36, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Bartos Gyula.jpg
- File:Darvas Lili-Anna.jpg
- File:Darvas Lili-Baló Elemér.jpg
- File:Kosáry Emmy-Nádor Jenő.jpg
- File:Nádor Jenő.jpg
Yours sincerely, Regasterios (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
A halálozási dátumnak beírni a 20. századot elég meglepőǃ Akkor már miért nem a 21. század. Tambo (talk) 19:17, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Segítek tisztázni ezt a hihetetlenül „meglepő” dolgot.
- Tudható, hogy Labori Mészöly Miklós 1883. július 30-án született.[4]
- Munkáiból tudható, hogy munkássága a XX. századra tehető.
- Na már most, a XXI. század, tudvalevő, 2001. január 1-jén kezdődött.
- Ha Labori Mészöly Miklós legkorábban 2001. január 1-jén halt volna meg, akkor is 117 éves lett volna halálakor. (Ez a {{Életkor-holt|1883|07|30|2001|01|01}} karaktersor bemásolásával, előnézetben is ellenőrizhető.)
- Bár található forrás arra, hogy van olyan ember, aki megérte a 117 évet, arra nincs, hogy Labori Mészöly megérte volna ezt a tekintélyes kort.
- Nyilvánvaló, ha Labori megérte volna a 117-et (vagy megközelítőleg annyit), az az 1990-es évek végén, de pláne a 2000-es évek elején rengeteg helyen megjelent volna, nem csak halálakor, de már életében is.
- Mivel 1944-ben még élt, mert vannak abból az időszakból származó adatok (Egy adatközlő ív szerint 1944-ben külföldön, nizzai lakcímén tartózkodott.), és 1944 a XX. században volt, és mivel nincs forrása, sem nyoma, hogy megérte a 117 éves kort (amit egyébként 2000. július 30-án töltött volna be, de ugyebár az még a XX. század), így -- logikai úton haladva -- kizárólag a XX. században halhatott meg.
Remélem, hogy így azért már nem annyira „meglepő” ez az adat! Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 06:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC) ̟ @Hungarikusz Firkász: Örömmel vettem, hogy próbáltál segíteni. Ez sajnos nem sikerült. Bár szerinted "meglepő" dologról van szó, szerintem korántsem. Labori Mészöly Miklós valóban 1883. július 30-án született. A fellelhető források alapján, annyi tudható, hogy 1944-ben Nizzában élt. A Későbbiekről nem lelhető fel semmiféle hiteles információ. Semmiféle hiteles adat nem támasztja alá, hogy pontosan mikor hunyt el. A Wikipedia alapelve, hogy csak megbízható, hiteles információkra támaszkodik, nem fogad el feltételezéseket, egyéni szubjektív kitalációkat, korábban sehol nem publikált feltételezéseket. Alapelve az ellenőrizhetetlenség. Ha létezne megbízható, hiteles forrás, készséggel elfogadnám. Mivel mindkét szerkesztőtársunk nagy rutinnal rendelkezik a képek megítélésében, érthetetlennek tartom, hogyan keveredhetnek ilyen feltételezésekbe egy törlési megbeszélés kapcsán? Mindkét szerkesztőtárs nagy munkát fektet az ellenőrizésekbe, de jobb lenne, ha ezt nagyobb körültekintéssel végeznék. Tambo (talk) 12:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Cselle Lajos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:22, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Druschetzky György.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Emptywords (talk) 07:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Áprily Lajos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 21:43, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Beck Ö. Fülöp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 18:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Som Lajos.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Lutheraner (talk) 23:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Darius I the Great's inscription.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rohalamin (talk) 08:16, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Kötelék-001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
File:HÉV térkép.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
File:Balatonföldvár vasútállomás, 1935, Erdélyi Mici és Ráday Imre, Fortepan 53263 (részlet 02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Szirmai Albert.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 18:00, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Nagyatádi Szabó István.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 08:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Nagyatádi Szabó István.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 11:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Doclys👨⚕️👩⚕️ 🩺 • 💉 05:21, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Gaetano Salvemini.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |