User_talk:Kevin Payravi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:SuperHamster)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Kevin Payravi's Talk Page

Userpage - Talkpage - Email - Contributions - Uploads


Posting Here

Feel free to leave me a message here. Questions, comments, suggestions, and requests are all welcome. I'm human, and I do make mistakes – please feel free to point out any that I've made.

If the matter is one that requires more privacy (or if it is just more convenient for you), you may always email me if you wish.


Archives by year: 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024


Before leaving a message…
New messages go at the bottom of the page.
Remember to sign using "~~~~"




Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, SuperHamster!

Hi Kevin, just wanted clarification on submission dates for USA Wiki Loves Monuments 2024

[edit]

Ideally I like to get to work on uploading my images before start in Oct 1st; since I'll be traveling soon after that date which doesn't give me much time. Would that be acceptable or is it automatic disqualification? Thank you, hope life is good. BFN Gillfoto (talk) 17:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Having some issues loading photographs to WLM 2024 Germany .....

[edit]

Hello, It's been a while hope your still out there doing the good work. This year did a European trip, I had one minor problem uploading two Irish files but most went upload. Now I'm working on Germany, we went down the Rhine River, I've been trying to upload some photos through 'Monumental' but after doing the editing and captioning then uploading they just disappear. Can you help? Frustrated and getting tired . . . . Gillfoto (talk) 20:51, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Gillfoto: Do you still need help with those photos? Let me know if you do. I see you've been uploading many photos from Europe, so hopefully the issues were resolved. I hope you've had a great trip! ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 02:37, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kevin, thank you for your response and yes it was quite the trip; getting back to my roots in Ireland and my country of birth Scotland. Pity Holland and Switzerland were not partaking in WLM2024 as I have many photos in both those countries.
Turns out one of the most common problems were the special European "composite characters" which were in the image file name, once I took them off the file was uploaded.
There was a couple of old b/w photos that merited inclusion but for some reason they did not go up to 'Glasgow', some day I'll retry .
Thanks again.
Gillfoto (talk) 17:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to re-enable https://wikilovesmonuments.us/upload now that October 1 has arrived.

[edit]

See User talk:Kevin Payravi#Hi_Kevin, just wanted clarification on submission dates for USA Wiki Loves Monuments 2024, for example. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 01:44, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DanielPenfield: will have it enabled soon! The upload period formally starts once October 1 begins in US Eastern time. Thanks, ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 01:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The contest rules clearly state "but must be uploaded during October 2024" with zero mention of timezone. A reasonable person would interpret this as "between 00:00:00 1 October UTC and 23:59:59 31 October UTC+12 (that is, the last second of 31 October at the International Date Line), inclusive", in other words "any time during October anywhere on planet Earth". If you're changing the rules by requiring a starting timezone that is not UTC (but apparently not a concluding timezone) after the contest starts, then I request that you make that change explicitly in the contest rules at COM:Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in the United States. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 01:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DanielPenfield: Fair enough! I wouldn't mind following UTC, though the standard for WLM events is that they start and end per the most eastern and western timezones for that country, respectively. I've updated the rules. I've also enabled the upload portal, and I will update the landing page with the upload links closer to the contest start. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 02:35, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a written source for the claim "the standard for WLM events is that they start and end per the most eastern and western timezones for that country"? We both know that the contest rules for WLMUS have never really been enforced that strictly and you've given people several days into November to submit for each contest. You've even allowed one contest winner to enter multiple old uploads as if they had been submitted during the contest window. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 03:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DanielPenfield: see upload campaign setup and the list of campaign times. Note that not everything that is submitted via categorization on Commons is what goes into the judging pool; through the Montage tool we use for judging, images are filtered out by upload date before they are reviewed by the jury, so late submissions are not included. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 03:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ohio public records

[edit]

Hi Kevin --

I recently stumbled across this discussion where you explained the current state of research and discussion around the freedom of Ohio public records.

This is relevant to a current deletion discussion, so I wonder if you would mind contributing a comment there about the current consensus on this topic please? (As the original nominator, I'm specifically not asking you for an opinion on whether the file should be kept or not; but you are of course free to provide one.) --Rlandmann (talk) 23:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rlandmann: Thanks for letting me know! What an interesting set of circumstances...I'll take a look. Thanks, ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 02:40, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. There's a lot going on in some of these NWS-related cases, but it's the "public record" bit that makes this one different.
Having delved into both the Ohio code and into the case law a little, I actually wonder whether most of these types of public records are in fact free to use. As I understand it, subsequent copying is explicitly permitted, commercial use is explicitly permitted, and modification is arguably implicitly permitted. And there doesn't even seem to be a right to attribution retained by the State.
If so, it seems to me that such records would have a "CC-zero"-like status: the state would own a copyright derived from federal law, but via statute and common law be unable to actually exercise any of the rights that a copyright holder normally can.
And if that's so, then dire copyright warnings like we see on the ODOT website are actually a bit of overreach. As a precaution though, we'd obviously want to be very sure of that before we decided to disregard such warnings!
But I'd definitely love to hear more from you or any other folks who've been looking at this and thinking about it for a lot longer than I have! --Rlandmann (talk) 04:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]