User talk:Sorenhk

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive: September 11th, 2011 - January 1th, 2014

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sorenhk!
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Oversigtsplan Hadsund Butikscenter.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg lægger ikke en fil op hvis jeg ikke har fået lov til det. Tilladelsen er givet af Jan Vestergaard, Service- og aktivitetsansvarlig i Hadsund Butikscenter. E-mail: e-mail: jatime@jatime.dk. --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 16:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Statue-ophavsretsproblemer

[edit]

Der er problemer med foto af skulpturer, jvf. Ophavsretsloven 24.2 Se Category:Statue of the Little Mermaid (Copenhagen). Jeg har sat nogle 'copyvio' ind flere steder. — Fnielsen (talk) 17:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Der er ingen problemer da tilladelsen er givet af butikscenteret. --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 18:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Stenfiguren i Storegade.jpg er langt fra en skulptur. Det er en der blev givet til gågaden af Hadsund Stenhugger i 1900. Vi bør måske lige kikke Category:Fountains in Denmark igennem da der er rigtig mange skulpturere. Vh --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 18:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Skulpturerne er kunstværker hvor ophavsretten sandsynligvis ikke er udløbet (de ser da ihvertfald moderne ud). Rettighedshaveren er kunstneren eller evt. arvinger. Det er ikke butikscentret, - selv om de har købt en kopi. Desværre :-(. Se evt. [1]Fnielsen (talk) 19:12, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Prøv en gang lige at tage et kik på File:Støvring 02 ies.jpg, File:Støvring 03 ies.jpg og File:Hobro - Adelgade 02 ies.jpg --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 19:42, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

your tagging of artworks in Denmark

[edit]

Hi Søren1997, when you tag files for suspicion of copyvio, please use the copyvio-link in the toolbox (left side of screen) or notify the uploaders manually about the problem. Otherwise, the uploaders remain without notice or the deleting administators first have to check whether the uploaders were notified and eventually notify them, which adds unnecessary workload. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll see if I can figure out to use it. --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 17:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Simple geometriske former?

[edit]

Hvordan kan du mene at Post Danmarks logo (her især det kronede posthorn) falder under simple geometriske former? --Palnatoke (talk) 10:03, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Post Danmark logo.svg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Palnatoke (talk) 10:07, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


File:Internet Explorer 7 and 8 logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fma12 (talk) 20:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have deleted all the obvious copyvios. For simple logos, I have started regular deletion requests, because they could be below COM:TOO. Best regards, BrightRaven (talk) 17:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, you have done nothing wrong. I just think regular deletion requests are more appropriate for simple logos because it is not obvious copyright violation, so it should be discussed. Best regards, BrightRaven (talk) 17:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It was as fortunate. It is you who decide whisper templates to be on. It's probably a good idea to discuss the logos you refer.

It should be emphasized that User: Luffe1810, a few hours ago was blocked off en: wiki for a week. The reasoning sounded "Copyright violation: and vandalism" See here. Best regards --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 18:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hedegaard Foods logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Revent (talk) 21:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Karl Christensen, borgmester.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Karl Christensen, borgmester.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:14, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hej Patrick Rogel. det bliver en smule svært at henvise til en hjemmeside. Billedet er trykt trykt i Nordjyske Stiftstidende den 15. december 2006. Billedet kan findes på side 88 her. Hvad kan jeg gøre? Mvh --Sorenhk (talk // contributions) 16:23, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You have to explain why the content of Nordjyske Stiftstidende is not copyrighted. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:31, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jeg prøver at sende en mail til Nordjyske Stiftstidende på mandag, for at høre dem angående billedet. --Sorenhk (talk // contributions) 16:39, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hej Søren! Som udgangspunkt er alt materiale i bøger, blade, aviser og på hjemmesider beskyttet af ophavsret. Så medmindre der udtrykkeligt står noget andet, så må vi ikke blot kopiere det. Hvis du spørger fx en avis og de giver tilladelse til at bruge billedet, så skal vi have det på skrift. Vi har nogle skabeloner til hvordan sådanne tilladelser kan se ud. Se fx på Commons:E-mail-skabeloner. --MGA73 (talk) 16:43, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Ebbe i Hadsund.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SunnyTango (talk) 14:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]