User talk:Honza chodec
Články První kroky a Často kladené dotazy Vám velmi pomohou. Naleznete zde návod, jak si nastavit prostředí (například jazyk), jak nahrávat obrázky a také naši licenční politiku. Přispívat zde může každý bez zvláštních technických znalostí. Buďte odvážní při editaci a předpokládejte dobrou vůli ostatních přispěvatelů. Je to wiki – vše je jednoduché. Více informací je možno nalézt na Portále Commons. Můžete klást otázky na stránce Help desk, Pod lípou nebo na IRC kanále #wikimedia-commons. Můžete také kontaktovat správce na jejich diskusních stránkách. Pokud máte specifický dotaz ohledně autorských práv, ptejte se na stránce Commons:Licensing questions. |
| |
(P.S. Chcete nám poskytnout zpětnou vazbu na tuto zprávu?) |
Kimsə (talk) 23:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 06:18, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:VysokéMýtoZvonice.JPG is uncategorized since 2 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:18, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Škoda706ROinVM3.9.2005.JPG is uncategorized since 2 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:18, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Upload form
[edit]New question for you at MediaWiki_talk:UploadFormLabels/UploadFormTranslations#New_translations_by_User:Slfi. It'd be great if you could check this and answer back. Thanks, Lupo 15:38, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Sodomka
[edit]Všiml jsem si, že jsi obrázky File:MHV Mercedes-Sodomka 170 01.jpg, File:MHV Mercedes-Sodomka 170 02.jpg vyřadil z Category:Karoserie Sodomka a do popisu editace jsi napsal "this isn't sodomka's body!!" Nemám znalosti k tomu, abych rozsuzoval odborné spory, nicméně prozatím nemám důvod se domnívat, že autor fotky si tento údaj vymyslel. Rozhodně je nepřijatelné, abys pouze umázl kategorii a přitom nechal tento údaj v popisu i názvu fotky (ostatně také by nebylo dobré, abys údaj jen tak bez diskuse či zdroje mazal z popisu fotky). A pokud jsi s autorem fotky ve sporu, tak bych i čekal, že jako "oponent" své tvrzení doložíš i něčím jiným než jen dvěma vykřičníky. Zatím, jak vidím, diskusní stránky obou obrázků jsou prázdné a na diskusní stránce uploadera také nevidím nic k věci. Prozatím kategorii vracím, než se věc vysvětlí. --ŠJů (talk) 11:35, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Doložit to můžu například mailem od ředitele vysokomýtského muzea, který pořádá každoročně festival Sodomkovo Vysoké Mýto. Podle něj Sodomka karosoval pouze jeden Mercedes, a jak můžeš vidět, vypadal úplně jinak. Omlouvám se za způsob řešení, ale nevím jak zde na commons zpochybnit popis.--Slfi (talk) 11:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Asi by bylo dobré přinejmenším se pokusit zjistit od autora popisku, kde na ty údaje přišel. Přepokládám, že to opsal z nějakého popisku na té automobilové výstavě ve Fürstenfeldu, kde byl snímek pořízen. Druhou možností je, že jde o nějaký omyl (omylem zkopírovaný popisek odjinud atd.). Jde-li o první možnost, tak informace od vlastníka, který dává historické vozidlo na výstavu, by měla mít podobnou váhu jako informace od ředitele vysokomýtského muzea. --ŠJů (talk) 12:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your correction. :-) sincerley --Lysippos (talk) 19:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
TUSC token 87ff23db5546f248e5afd2fe75c40d3c
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Voting!
[edit]I am inviting people who might be interested to a vote on how to subdivide the disputed Škoda 742 category here: VOTE
Best regards, Mr.choppers (talk) 20:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/DOD_%C5%98epy%2C_hasi%C4%8Dsk%C3%A9_vozidlo_SDH_DP.jpg/220px-DOD_%C5%98epy%2C_hasi%C4%8Dsk%C3%A9_vozidlo_SDH_DP.jpg)
Škoda 706 RT
[edit]Sure that it is an 706 RT? Couldn't it be an 706 MT?Sandmann4u (talk) 09:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, if you looked at the picture, there is on left side sign with subscription "Škoda 706 RTHP". Cab could be new.--Slfi (talk) 12:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Tatra 613 Vignale
[edit]Since the Tatra 613 was designed by Vignale to begin with, I see no reason to have a separate category for those two photos. Best regards, Mr.choppers (talk) 16:30, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
- But cars in category are prototypes build by Vignale in Italy.--Slfi (talk) 16:35, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
- True, true. But nonetheless I think it would be less confusing to list them simply as "Tatra 613 prototypes", since all 613s are already listed under Vignale? Also, I feel that this category title implies that Vignale had nothing to do with the "regular" 613. But it is not very important. Mr.choppers (talk) 06:30, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- "Tatra 613 prototypes" is possible too. But on the other hand, the inclusion of "Tatra 613" in category Vignale gives the feeling that all Tatra 613 were built in Italy on Tatra 613 chassis. Maybe it could be "Category:Vignale designs"?--Slfi (talk) 11:23, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- I agree and think it should be "Category:Vignale designs" or, as seems to be the standard, Category:Vehicles by Vignale. See here. Also, listing Vignale as a manufacturer rather than a designer seems to me to be incorrect. I guess we should fix these things first! Mr.choppers (talk) 17:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know Vignale's work, but I think it should be the same as Pininfarina: "Vignale vehicles" and "Vehicles designed by Vignale". I think that Vignale was also manufacturer.--Slfi (talk) 19:14, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- "Tatra 613 prototypes" is possible too. But on the other hand, the inclusion of "Tatra 613" in category Vignale gives the feeling that all Tatra 613 were built in Italy on Tatra 613 chassis. Maybe it could be "Category:Vignale designs"?--Slfi (talk) 11:23, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- True, true. But nonetheless I think it would be less confusing to list them simply as "Tatra 613 prototypes", since all 613s are already listed under Vignale? Also, I feel that this category title implies that Vignale had nothing to do with the "regular" 613. But it is not very important. Mr.choppers (talk) 06:30, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Condenser microphone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ea f20 microphone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Celtic ero!
[edit]I propose to modify the scope. Regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:29, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've changed scope.--Slfi (talk) 13:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mšecké Žehrovice - Stone sculpture of Celtic hero.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Uncategorized
[edit]Hello Slfi!
Thank you very much for your good work on our enormous uncategorized-mountain. Keep up your efforts, we need every good hand in order the reduce the number of files without categories. Thanks again and happy editing. Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 08:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for thanking me :-D, I do it gladly because it is needed and results are immediately visible.--Slfi (talk) 19:32, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
DR's
[edit]I have seen many DR's from your side, you can use the speedy deletion option for obvious copyvios, so that a discussion is not required, if you are in doubt please put regular deletion...--...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 09:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I sometimes used template copyvio too, but sometimes is easier for me click to "Nominate for deletion". I promise, that I will stop doing that, I already trying using Ajax.--Slfi (talk) 19:32, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sodomkovo Mýto 2011 - 59.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hi Honza chodec. I noticed you tagged File:Tourmisueño2.jpg as copyvio per possible out of scope. However, it is not part of speedy deletion guidelines so for these cases it is okay to nominate for deletion. Anything that is "possibly" or "without description" should be nominated for deletion instead. Thank you! --ZooFari 16:36, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing me, it is my mistake, I clicked the wrong link.--Honza chodec, earlier known as Slfi (talk) 18:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Rotate
[edit]I hope you don't mind - I removed {{Rotate}} from your gallery. I have tagged the individual files for rotation by a bot. The template works with the bot, if you add 90, 180 or 270 (degrees clockwise) but does not work for a gallery or category. Otherwise, it places the item in Category:Images requiring rotation. Finavon (talk) 17:45, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- It's added automaticaly by commonist, thanks for removing.--Honza chodec (talk) 17:47, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Autobusy v Brně
[edit]Čau. Prosím tě, nevzpomínáš si, kde jsi fotil ty fotky autobusů, co jsou v Category:Brno? Chtěl bych to zakategorizovat podrobněji, aby to nestrašilo v té nejobecnější kategorii... --Harold (talk) 14:51, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ahoj, vzpomínám, ale nenašel jsem kategorii Zvonařka. Je to focené na tom starém autobusáku (nebo to aspoň vypadá jako staré nádraží) jak tam do nedávna parkovaly busy. Díky za zařazení do správné kategorie.--Honza chodec (talk) 16:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Super. Mám takový pocit, že to bylo provizorní autobusové nádraží, když se stavěla Zvonařka, ale 100% jistý si tím nejsem. --Harold (talk) 20:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Deprecated License
[edit]
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:N-S 70b Na kopečku II 05.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:54, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:N-S 70b Na kopečku II 04.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:54, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:N-S 70b Na kopečku II 03.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:55, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:N-S 70b Na kopečku II 02.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:55, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:N-S 70b Na kopečku II 01.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:55, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
TUSC token 654c27b6e5534155f809a6433385a876
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
I was wondering why this was not put on the talk page?
[edit]see here, ----Erkan Yilmaz 08:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hello, I used "Nominate for deletion" button, so this template was insert by script. So you should ask here here.--Honza chodec (talk) 10:54, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Práva
[edit]Zdravím, chtěl bych se zeptat, jak to udělat, aby mé obrázky zde nebyly kopírovány. Myslím, abych mé fotografie směl používat jen já a nikdo jiný (copyright), nebo jak se tomu říká :) děkuji za odpověď Edisteewr (talk) 18:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Zdravím. To, co popisujete, na Commons NELZE, protože by to šlo proti smyslu projektu. K ukládání soukromých a jinak licencovaných fotografií použijte běžné internetové fotogalerie - Flickr, Picasa, české Rajče nebo i Facebook a další, tyto fotografie ale nepůjde použít na wikipedii. Mimochodem, koukal jsem na kategorie vašich fotografií - kategorie na Commons jsou v angličtině, nepoužívejte proto prosím české názvy kategorií. Děkuji, Honza chodec (talk) 19:26, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ale v anglické verzi wiki (nevím jestli i v české - nepátral jsem) jsem narazil na takové fotografie - nemohl jsem je přetáhnout do české jelikož tam byl copyright. Edisteewr (talk) 07:03, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- Anglická Wikipedie má pro některé obrázky výjimku, tyto obrázky se ale můžou použít pouze na anglické wikipedii a nikde jinde (nesmí se objevit mimo wikipedii). Česká wikipedie tuto výjimku nemá a hlavně ani nemá své vlastní uložiště obrázků, všechny obrázky se ukládají na Commons. Honza chodec (talk) 10:29, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ale v anglické verzi wiki (nevím jestli i v české - nepátral jsem) jsem narazil na takové fotografie - nemohl jsem je přetáhnout do české jelikož tam byl copyright. Edisteewr (talk) 07:03, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Kategorizace bez popisu
[edit]Zdravím. Pokud kategorizuješ obrázky podle nějakých málo zjevných znaků, tak se prosím pokus aspoň do popisu připsat nějakou poznámku, proč obrázek do dané kategorie podle tebe patří. Jinak, pokud kategorizuješ a přitom nedoplníš nic do popisu, si kolegové mohou myslet, že ses třeba jen omylem uklikl. V případě frýdlantského gymnázia BMA jsem nakonec nalezl alespoň rozmazaný státní znak na vchodu budovy, ale na této fotce stále žádný záchytný bod nenacházím. Žádný popis, název obrázku naprosto bezobsažný, na jednom okně nápis Herzlich willkomen, opravdu netuším proč jsi to zakategorizoval do České republiky... --ŠJů (talk) 11:26, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ahoj, to bylo v době, kdy jsem ve velkém likvidoval nekategorizované obrázky. Vždycky jsem na té fotce něco našel, ale pro rychlost jsem používal Commonscat, takže nebylo kam napsat poznámku. Máš pravdu, že teď už se to bude blbě dohledávat. Už nevím, podle čeho jsem to poznal, ale když se na tu fotku podívám teď, pořád mám pocit, že je to focené v Česku. Vypadá to na nějakou školu ale mate nápis Willkommen herzlich, takže buď Německo, nebo se tam němčina učí. Teď už těžko říct. Pro příště teda budu psát poznámky.--Honza chodec (talk) 15:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
- Dík za odpověď. Nojo, no člověk nesmí bejt ukvapenej. Já se při kategorizaci podle zemí většinou prvotně orientuju podle toho, že název fotky je česky, a příhlížím i k tomu, odkud pochází autor fotky, ale nikdy se nelze spolehnout jen na to - stejně se člověk musí nad každou fotkou zamyslet. A pocity mohou být velmi ošidné. Nápis "Herzlich willkommen" může být klidně třeba v učebně němčiny někde v Maďarsku, podle toho se orientovat moc nedá. --ŠJů (talk) 11:56, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Honza chodec, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
![]() |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 08:08, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dolní oblast Vítkovic 07-08-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
WLM Barnstar
[edit]
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
![]() |
File:U Vinic 06-2011-2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Brunei (talk) 22:04, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Plchovice has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Juandev (talk) 18:16, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Znak města Horšovský Týn.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Znak města Horšovský Týn.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Castillo blanco (talk) 06:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:New Škoda logo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)