User talk:Saga City

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Saga City!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Category:Women_named_Barbara

Category discussion notification

Category:Women_named_Barbara has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 21:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token c92e83641923470000bcbad69b22e07e

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Categories like "Railway bridges in the Outer Hebrides"

Hi! If you find any more empty and unneeded categories like this you can add a {{Speedy|Reason}} - it is probably easer than starting a category for discussion. I created thousand of categories with my bot when we prepared an upload of about one million files. A few of those categories are useless but it was much easier to create all the categories and just delete the empty ones after the upload. --MGA73 (talk) 00:22, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. I'd worked out the reason but wasn't sure of the etiquette involved in deleting them. S a g a C i t y (talk) 09:47, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Lavender fields

… many thanks for further sorting! --:bdk: 17:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

London categories?

Hi, have you found any advice on what should be included in London / Greater London categories? I see you have moved File:Roman Catholic Church of St. James the Great, Petts Wood, Kent - geograph.org.uk - 137223.jpg from Category:Roman Catholic churches in London to Category:Roman Catholic churches in Greater London. I believe in most cases, the former category has been used for Greater London rather than London or City of London. This may be ambiguous, but is supported by the entry in the Counties of England template {{Counties of England|prefix=:Category:Roman Catholic churches in|suffix=}} being London rather than Greater London. Just thought I'd better warn you that if you are creating or populating Greater London categories then they won't appear in the general "Counties of England" navbox unless you ask for a change to it and that most established English ceremonial county groupings use London instead of Greater London, so they would all need changing or diffusion as well. Scillystuff (talk) 12:05, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Pictures and images

Hi, I see you've added some images to this previously-deleted category, and I can't think of a good reason for recreating such a broad category. It would seem that if these should be anywhere, Category:Views would be the obvious candidate; however, I suspect that there are more specific categories for them. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

It's the default category for Cat-a-lot; so a few have got in there by mistake. I then move them out again to their correct destination. S a g a C i t y (talk) 18:31, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Recent Edit

Not sure if this edit is strictly correct... Navigable (to me) suggests that a boat could use it - well maybe in the fullness of time, but since it's an empty trough over the M6toll with no connections - not as this time! I'm not fussed either way, I just did not know if you knew about the oddness of it - it's one of those odd things where the motorway got put in only if the builder made an aqueduct when the canal crossed the path. It went up in 2003, I guess another 10 years will go before it see any water... :-(  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:53, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

I have found that canal aqueducts are spread, chaotically, between Aqueducts, Canal Aqueducts and Navigable Aqueducts. As this stage I am trying to get the all in once place. Navigable Aqueduct seeming the most popular so I moving everything to there and this is one you noticed. As to the final naming my preference is 'Aqueducts built for canal traffic' as this will include those in and out of use - they will be contrasted against 'Aqueducts built to carry water'. Best Wishes S a g a C i t y (talk) 20:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Shipley Bridge

Hi, Shipley Bridge is a bridge, not a hamlet - so the majority of images placed in Category:Shipley Bridge do not belong there, and the cat should have the normal bridge categories (eg its listed status).--Nilfanion (talk) 13:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Saga City⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Category talk:Falkirk

Hi, I've made a propsal here if you are interested in commenting. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:33, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Saga City,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:St_Michael_and_All_Saints,_Rearsby

Category:St_Michael_and_All_Saints,_Rearsby has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Motacilla (talk) 07:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

RfC on the scope of file renaming criterion 2

Pursuant to the closing of the RFC "Proposed overhaul of the "Which files should be renamed?" section", a second RfC has been opened at Commons:Requests for comment/File renaming criterion 2 specifically to address the scope of criterion 2, which currently reads "To change from a completely meaningless name to a name that describes what the image displays." Since you participated in the initial discussion, I am notifying you of the follow-up RfC.

Please note that I fully anticipate that the first few days will see a number of additional options proposed, so it may be a good idea to check back periodically on the RfC.

Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:43, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

A road numbering

Just a heads up on the A road zone cats: The zones are geographic regions, and some roads are in multiple zones. An extreme case is the A38 (in 3, 4, 5 and 6).--Nilfanion (talk) 11:31, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Currently tying them in to English Wikipedia lists; will deal with anomalies once all 18 categories set up. Best Wishes S a g a C i t y (talk) 13:06, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Bots

You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

• The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
• Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Cobblers Thumb, Brighton

Hi, just wondering about this edit? The pub was demolished in summer/autumn 2013, and the site is now used for "shipping container" housing ([1]). Hassocks5489 (talk) 21:50, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

But it wasn't demolished when the photo was taken. S a g a C i t y (talk) 22:03, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

OK; when I found that category and started using it, that wasn't apparent (and looking at it now, the majority of images in it show buildings that were still standing at the time of the photo). Am I right in thinking, then, that the cat should only be used for buildings that are in the process of demolition, or of demolition sites? Hassocks5489 (talk) 22:11, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Kirkmichael_Arms_public_houses

Category:Kirkmichael_Arms_public_houses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Category:Berwickshire and other Shires of Scotland

Hi, it was agreed some three years ago after the unhelpful efforts of Scotire (talk · contribs) that categorisation of things in Scotland should be by Council area rather than the old Shire Counties, except for historical items. I've removed some images from the above category. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Newark‎

I see you reverted my edit. Disambiguation pages are not just for categories, they are for all pages (and therefore may include galleries), if you read the note in the {{Dab}} template, so my reasons are perfectly valid. But if you are going to "prettify" disambiguation pages by piping, please be prepared to do ALL of them rather than a piecemeal, half-cock job. Myself, I haven't the time to do so and am prepared to stick with the utterly clear format which has prevailed ever since I've been working here. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Leicester

Leicester is both a settlement and district, its just that there is no separate article or category for the district as it covers roughly the same area, however the article on Wikipedia might have to be split as it says it is too long. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Source? You cannot just assert that something is so. 'District' has two meanings when describing places in England, they can be metropolitan or non-metropolitan. Leicester, and for that matter the nearby cities of Derby and Nottingham are neither. S a g a C i t y (talk) 12:51, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

They are unitary authorities, which is a type of district, see this source for example. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:58, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

File:The Black Mountains at Turnant - geograph.org.uk - 570676.jpg

Don't understand why you removed Category:Black Mountains, Wales when the image title and text makes it clear that this is a mountain within that range, and that the category definition states that the range extends into Herefordshire? Cheers, Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

I've also replaced Category:Geograph images in Herefordshire in File:Black Darren - geograph.org.uk - 570716.jpg, because according to the Ordnance Survey, that mountain IS in Herefordshire. Removing geograph categories when they belong there makes the job so much more difficult, is plain wrong, and I'll be glad if you don't do it again. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Saga City,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

A112 road

There seems to only be 1 road called "A112" so is "(England)" needed?, w:A249 road doesn't include the qualifier on Wikipedia for example. Although I thought that the natural disambiguator "road" is usually included even if unnecessary, I don't think the country is required as well in England but it is in the US. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Please see Category:A roads in the United Kingdom by number for over a thousand examples of the agreed and longstanding method of indexing UK & NI roads. We are qualifying them for consistency and ahead of the need to disambiguate; in this case there will certainly be an A112 autobahn in Germany whose photos may not yet have arrived; there may be one in Norther Ireland whose numbering system parallels . You will see further examples of the practice in Category:B roads in the United Kingdom by number. S a g a C i t y (talk) 11:42, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Agreed, yes indeed we should think about categories that don't exist yet I accept that in this case it is acceptable to do this thanks. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Category:Saint Andrew Church (Sutton, Cambridgeshire)

The map on the image (example) shows that this isn't in Sutton, Peterborough and the Listed Building id says its in East Cambridgeshire. Its St Michael and All Angels Church in Sutton, Peterborough. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Category:Episcopalian_cathedrals_in_Scotland

Category:Episcopalian_cathedrals_in_Scotland has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Drbones1950 (talk) 17:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Canal boats

Are you aware that not all boats on UK canals are either narrow, or narrowboats? Andy Dingley (talk) 09:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Geograph

I've gone over Leicestershire now, and put ~900 files into their parish (or unparished town) cat. They are also in Category:Nilfanion temp. I'd appreciate it if you could look over them and see if there are any errors.--Nilfanion (talk) 12:27, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Ashton with Stodday

Do we need this as a separate cat? It appears to be a former civil parish not a hamlet anyway. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

On a quick check only it seems OK. But I'll look into it further. S a g a C i t y (talk)

Now checked and as a result have emptied it into its old parent. Found another mistake on the way! I do remember it was oddly involved when I did it as Stodday appears to to have divorced Ashton and is now with Aldcliffe. Thanks for bringing this to my attention S a g a C i t y (talk) 18:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Flower_fields_in_Myanmar

Category:Flower_fields_in_Myanmar has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

ISIL-KP (talk) 21:32, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:Images from Geograph Britain and Ireland

Category:Images from Geograph Britain and Ireland is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

G6: So that Category:Images from the Geograph British Isles project can be moved to this name, as discussed.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

--bjh21 (talk) 19:02, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Images from Geograph Britain and Ireland (obsolete category)

Category:Images from Geograph Britain and Ireland (obsolete category) is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD G1: I moved this category page to try to make another rename possible. It is of no further use.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

--bjh21 (talk) 19:02, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Common Spotted Orchid

Vernacular names

• English: Common spotted orchid
• azərbaycanca: Fuks səhləbi
• български: Обикновена петниста орхидея
• čeština: Prstnatec Fuchsův
• Deutsch: Fuchs' Knabenkraut
• eesti: Vööthuul-sõrmkäpp
• suomi: Kalkkimaariankämmekkä
• français: Orchis de Fuchs
• magyar: Erdei ujjaskosbor
• italiano: Orchide di Fuchs
• lietuvių: Aukštoji gegūnė
• latviešu: Fuksa dzegužpirkstīte
• Nederlands: Bosorchis
• norsk: Skogmarihand
• polski: Kukułka Fuchsa
• português: orquídea manchada comum
• русский: Пальчатокоренник Фукса
• slovenščina: Fuchsova prstasta kukavica
• svenska: Skogsnycklar
• українська: Пальчатокорінник Шоо

(Note: no wikidata item is associated with this user_talk)

....by the way... do you think it would be a good way to create categories of all these vernacular names with a redirect. ;-) Regards. Orchi (talk) 18:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

This is far from my area of expertise. However it is the established practice here for redirects from the vernacular to the Latin to be created and I've followed this. Of course it cannot be done where the vernacular name is ambiguous. Best Wishes S a g a C i t y (talk) 19:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Category:Cumbria_in_the_1960s

Cumbria in the 1960s has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Andy Dingley (talk) 17:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Geolocation to 1km precision: useless?

I notice that you recently reverted one of Geograph Update Bot's additions of a 1km-precision geolocation. Should I take it that you think geolocation at this precision is useless? If so, I can arrange for the bot not to propogate locations with 1km precision from Geograph (and, I suppose, to remove any that are already here). --bjh21 (talk) 19:52, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

In this case, and I suspect many others, it really is unhelpful. The picture being of a river flowing under an aqueduct and the point given was on a mountainside. Can 100m precision be achieved? This would be less liable to such misplacement. Best wishes S a g a C i t y (talk) 20:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

In cases like this, where Geograph only has 1km precision itself, my bot can't really do any better. It does at least mark the location with the correct precision, but few tools seem to pay attention to that. --bjh21 (talk) 20:58, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

As a temporary measure, I've told my bot to skip any files to which it was thinking about applying co-ordinates with "prec=1000". This should stop it making any more edits that will need to be reverted. --bjh21 (talk) 22:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

This may be for the best. Thanks. Best Wishes S a g a C i t y (talk) 22:59, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Holkham (West) Nature Reserve - geograph.org.uk - 261755 (cropped).jpg

Yours sincerely, bjh21 (talk) 20:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Sortkeys for surname categories

Just an FYI, there should be no need to add these as you did to Buddy Miles on January 28 as long as all the categories have DEFAULTSORT. - Bossanoven (talk) 19:56, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Penny_Fun_public_houses

Category:Penny_Fun_public_houses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Chemical Engineer (talk) 17:42, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

dEFAULTSORT

Hi, i reverted your edit because i'm in doubt for your words in my talk. You said that wikidata infobox provides automatically for sorting into the categories. I' didn't seen something similar to it. In the case of Ari Vatanen, in some categories Max Vatanen was listed before Ari, without the template DEFAULTSORT.--Louis.attene (talk) 06:48, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Space

Why did you make this edit? Am I missing something? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 20:43, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

It was just to force changes I'd made to the Wikidata (specifically adding the surname to it) to appear in Commons immediately. A typical null update. S a g a C i t y (talk) 22:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Please don't do that. In your Special:Preferences, look at the gadgets and enable the "Page Purge" gadget. Alternatively, add "?action=purge" in your address bar. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Have now done that - thanks for pointing it out S a g a C i t y (talk) 22:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks to you as well - I've seriously been puzzled for years by pointless space-edits (mostly on Wikipedia), asking myself what in the world those people were trying to achieve. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 00:02, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Medical writers vs Physician writers

Hi - I see you created a redirect from Category:Medical writers to Category:Physician writers. That's not really what I had in mind when I tagged the (few) physicians I came across. They were people that have added significantly to the literature for their field of medicine, not outside of that. I wasn't even sure that it needed a category (hence it wasn't created yet). Physician writers seem to be involved in writing outside their profession. I'm don't think that the redirect is correct, what do you think - is there merit in creating a "medical writers" category? Regards, -- Deadstar (msg) 16:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

I have no strong views either way. I created Category:Medical writers then, next day, on trying to link it to Wikidata/Wikipedia found that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Medical_writers is linked to Category:Physician writers. So I made my new category into a redirect. This was just a bit of tidying-up so, as I said, not something I'm particularly exercised about. Best Wishes S a g a C i t y (talk) 16:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

OK... I'll look into it. Thanks -- Deadstar (msg) 17:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Llandanwg station, 2001 (geograph 5507424).jpg

Hi. I've reverted your change to this image (from Category:Llandanwg railway station to Category:Pensarn railway station). I've also commented out the location information imported from the Geograph project, which I assume is what you based your change on. The geograph image describes itself as Llandanwg station, but has camera and object coordinates relating to Pensarn. Comparison of this photograph with the other images we already have for both stations shows that it is the Geograph description that is correct, and the coordinates in error. I will inform the Geograph project of this. -- Chris j wood (talk) 17:10, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

The geograph project have now corrected the coordinates on their version of this image, so I've used them to replace the commented out incorrect coordinates on our version. -- Chris j wood (talk) 09:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Connecting Wikidata to Wikimedia Commons

Don't forget, you can also add {{wikidata infobox}} to Wikimedia Commons and it will add most of the categories and a default sort automatically. Any photo stored in Wikidata will then be displayed. If you want you can add in a missing photo like I did here: Category:Granville George Algernon Egerton and wikidata:Q23041499. RAN (talk) 18:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I guess I've now done it a couple of thousand times. I don't think it was fully available in January 2017 in the case in point. S a g a C i t y (talk) 19:15, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Category:Lejla (given name)

Hi there. Thanks for opening the Category:Lejla (given name) again. (I was sure that there would be people called "Lejla"... :) Can you please do something -I tried but to no avail- to take Leyla Aliyeva out of this cat, as her name is not "Lejla"? Best. --E4024 (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Most probably I am having a browser problem again... --E4024 (talk) 16:23, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Help request

Hi. I saw you editing Category:Women of Italy by name and I understand you know templates well. The countries template at that cat is not in correct alphabetical order, placing Turkey after UK. Can you please kindly have a look, if you can correct that? Thanks in advance and happy weekend. --E4024 (talk) 22:41, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Chakrabarti_(surname)

Chakrabarti (surname) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 20:28, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Portuguese onomastics

Kindly refrain from contaminating Commons with nonsense categories spawned from Wikidata’s shortcomings. This is a case of multiple surnames, which is trivial for Portuguese-language anthroponyms, not the much rarer (and encyclopedicly relevant) compound surnames. There’s no good reason to treat these transient, fortuitous clusters of surnames in separate categories, as opposed to simply categorize individual categories of name-bearers themselves under each of their several surnames (and given names, too, by the way). Portuguese is not Spanish, nor French, nor Russian, nor Icelandic, nor Hungarian, nor Korean — onomastics is hard and you should trust your fellow editors who know about the subject more than you do. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:15, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Tiny categories

What is the point of creating subcategories like this when we have no other photographs from that day, and no other file classified as a U.S. photo for a week before or after that on either side? - Jmabel ! talk 16:09, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

- In a word, standardisation. To go further it allows enquiries by petscan and similar tools across numerous catgories; in the specific case you mention it would allow for someone wishing to identify all USA cityscapes in the 1920s and had it not been brought to a country-specific category it would be missed. So, by itself, pointless but useful as part of a larger matrix. S a g a C i t y (talk) 18:24, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

• It was already in March 1952 in the United States. I don't think we should be creating categories just for the sake of tools that actually make things more difficult for human users. - Jmabel ! talk 03:12, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Rosier Faasen

Hi, Saga City the name is actually Rosier Faassen, with double 'ss. Would you mind renaming? Thank you for your time. :- Lotje (talk) 06:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Of course! Thanks for pointing this out S a g a C i t y (talk) 07:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Greyhound and Punchbowl public houses

Category:Greyhound and Punchbowl public houses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Sionk (talk) 22:37, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Tadeusz Wardejn-Zagórski

Hallo. The name of this person is : pl:Tadeusz Wardejn-Zagórski without eg. The author of this slogan made a mistake. It's a classic typo. 95.112.42.231 14:00, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

@95.112.42.231: Thanks - from the changes made I guessed this to be so. Best Wishes S a g a C i t y (talk) 15:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Removal of category

Hi, Saga City; wondering why you made this edit. There is a Category:Van den Bergh (surname). Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

@Lotje: - as it was you'd put the whole item into surnames. I've now finished the job! Best Wishes S a g a C i t y (talk) 07:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Category:A6177_road_(England)

A6177 road (England) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Matthias Winkelmann (talk) 16:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Correct sortorder for Nordic alphabets

Hi Saga City. You have just changed the sortorder for some Nordic artists (like Category:Emil Bærentzen. Please do not do that. The sortorder should be according to the Nordic latin alphabets, which have "æ", "ø" and "å" as the last three letters. Commons knows how to sort them correctly, so your actions in this field are uncalled for. Please revert them. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 16:26, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi again. Your lack of response might indicate that this issue is not really important to you. Well, it is to others, so your changes to the sortorder of Nordic alphabets - where found - have been restored to their correct settings. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 08:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Oshrat Kotler (cropped).jpg

Yours sincerely, -- Geagea (talk) 08:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

"Family name not available from Wikidata"

Hi Saga City, just a suggestion: instead of adding a comment in the categories like here you could add the family names to Wikidata. This would help other projects and avoid later cleanups. Regards, --Arnd (talk) 10:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

You have, I guess, found on old note from me saying this. I no longer leave these and do, as you suggest, add family names to Wikidata. Historically I was trying to avoid getting lost in the maze of Wikdata as it was slowinng up progress in targetted areas.

Best Wishes S a g a C i t y (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok, my bot just cleaned up the cases where there was already the family name on WD such as here. If you like to work on the remaining cases by adding the family name to WD it is here. Sooner or later they will also be cleaned up. --Arnd (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Will do. You may not be surprised to learn that these are on a "to do" list that's running about 40 months slow.

Best Wishes Again S a g a C i t y (talk) 11:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:1941 in Merseyside

Except Category:Merseyside refers only to the county with the inception being 1974. What geographic entity are you referring to? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Pembrokeshire_in_the_1980s

Pembrokeshire in the 1980s has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ricky81682 (talk) 07:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Tamanna Agnihotri, november 2020 (cropped).jpg

File:Tamanna Agnihotri, november 2020 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Romance of the Limberlost (1938) 1.jpg

Hi Saga City, Can you please do a cropped version of this file to only show the image of the actress Sarah Padden (the woman in the middle)? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.227.226.137 (talk) 18:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

I have done the best I can - see Best Wishes S a g a C i t y (talk) 07:50, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Olivia Arben London 2017 (cropped).jpg

File:Olivia Arben London 2017 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Olivia Arben (talk) 19:06, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Category:B2022_road_(England)

Category:B2022_road_(England) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Pelican860 (talk) 22:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Category:Railway_Inn_public_houses

Railway Inn public houses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Crouch, Swale (talk) 13:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:Rose and Lion pubs

Category:Rose and Lion pubs is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

only 1 pub with this name and it now has a category, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/07/Category:Greyhound and Punchbowl public houses

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Crouch, Swale (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Category:Hermit of Redcoats pubs

Category:Hermit of Redcoats pubs is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

only 1 pub with this name and it now has a category, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/07/Category:Greyhound and Punchbowl public houses

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:08, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Category:Kentish Horse pubs

Category:Kentish Horse pubs is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

only 1 pub with this name and it now has a category, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/07/Category:Greyhound and Punchbowl public houses

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:44, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Category:Magdalena Krebs

Category:Magdalena Krebs is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ ^{🩺 • 💉} 04:27, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Belper Arms public houses

Category:Belper Arms public houses is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

only 1 pub with this name and it now has a category, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/07/Category:Greyhound and Punchbowl public houses

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Crouch, Swale (talk) 15:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Spade Tree pubs

Category:Spade Tree pubs is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

only 1 pub with this name and it now has a category, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/07/Category:Greyhound and Punchbowl public houses

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Crouch, Swale (talk) 15:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Lord Alcester pubs

Category:Lord Alcester pubs is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

only 1 pub with this name and it now has a category, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/07/Category:Greyhound and Punchbowl public houses

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:52, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Iorwerth Arms pubs

Category:Iorwerth Arms pubs is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

only 1 pub with this name and it now has a category, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/07/Category:Greyhound and Punchbowl public houses

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Crouch, Swale (talk) 05:52, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Mushroom Hall public houses

Category:Mushroom Hall public houses is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

only 1 pub with this name and it now has a category, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/07/Category:Greyhound and Punchbowl public houses

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Cressy Arms pubs

Category:Cressy Arms pubs is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

only 1 pub with this name and it now has a category, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/07/Category:Greyhound and Punchbowl public houses

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Apethorn public houses

Category:Apethorn public houses is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

only 1 pub with this name and it now has a category, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/07/Category:Greyhound and Punchbowl public houses

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Crouch, Swale (talk) 15:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Jordan Smith 2019 (cropped).jpg

Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 01:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Category:Niek_Sebens

Niek Sebens has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

EpicExplorer9999 (talk) 19:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

File tagging File:Monika Milewska (cropped to square).JPG

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Monika Milewska (cropped to square).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Monika Milewska (cropped to square).JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Boston9 (talk) 03:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Category:Towneley Arms pubs

Category:Towneley Arms pubs is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

only 1 pub with this name and it now has a category, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/07/Category:Greyhound and Punchbowl public houses

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Crouch, Swale (talk) 14:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)